{"id":662332,"date":"2026-04-23T19:07:00","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T17:07:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T19:07:00","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T17:07:00","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 107\/19.0T8CBA.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: MARIA DA GRA?A TRIGO. I. Lida e interpretada a decis?o recorrida, n?o se vislumbra qualquer v?cio na constru??o l?gica da mesma, tendo o tribunal a quo afirmado, simplesmente, que, tendo por refer?ncia a mat?ria de facto dada como provada, existiam elementos bastantes para qualificar a servid?o em causa nos autos como sendo aparente; saber se o tribunal decidiu bem ou mal ? mat?ria que se coloca no n?vel do eventual erro de julgamento e n?o ao n?vel da invocada nulidade. II. Como resulta do regime dos n.os 1 e 2 do art. 1548.? do CC, para que uma servid?o seja aparente, e para que possa ser adquirida por usucapi?o, deve revelar-se atrav?s de sinais vis?veis e permanentes. III. No caso dos autos, o sinal vis?vel e permanente, consubstanciador da apar?ncia da servid?o, ? a exist?ncia de uma passagem com a largura de cerca de dois metros e extens?o de oito metros a que, antes de bloqueada pelos r?us, os autores acediam atrav?s de um port?o (ou portal) de comunica??o aramado, situado igualmente no terreno dos r?us.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: MARIA DA GRA?A TRIGO. I. Lida e interpretada a decis?o recorrida, n?o se vislumbra qualquer v?cio na constru??o l?gica da mesma, tendo o tribunal a quo afirmado, simplesmente, que, tendo por refer?ncia a mat?ria de facto dada como provada, existiam elementos bastantes para qualificar a servid?o em causa nos autos como sendo aparente; saber se o tribunal decidiu bem ou mal ? mat?ria que se coloca no n?vel do eventual erro de julgamento e n?o ao n?vel da invocada nulidade. II. Como resulta do regime dos n.os 1 e 2 do art. 1548.? do CC, para que uma servid?o seja aparente, e para que possa ser adquirida por usucapi?o, deve revelar-se atrav?s de sinais vis?veis e permanentes. III. No caso dos autos, o sinal vis?vel e permanente, consubstanciador da apar?ncia da servid?o, ? a exist?ncia de uma passagem com a largura de cerca de dois metros e extens?o de oito metros a que, antes de bloqueada pelos r?us, os autores acediam atrav?s de um port?o (ou portal) de comunica??o aramado, situado igualmente no terreno dos r?us.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8784],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-662332","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-2-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 107\/19.0T8CBA.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 107\/19.0T8CBA.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: MARIA DA GRA?A TRIGO. I. Lida e interpretada a decis?o recorrida, n?o se vislumbra qualquer v?cio na constru??o l?gica da mesma, tendo o tribunal a quo afirmado, simplesmente, que, tendo por refer?ncia a mat?ria de facto dada como provada, existiam elementos bastantes para qualificar a servid?o em causa nos autos como sendo aparente; saber se o tribunal decidiu bem ou mal ? mat?ria que se coloca no n?vel do eventual erro de julgamento e n?o ao n?vel da invocada nulidade. II. Como resulta do regime dos n.os 1 e 2 do art. 1548.? do CC, para que uma servid?o seja aparente, e para que possa ser adquirida por usucapi?o, deve revelar-se atrav?s de sinais vis?veis e permanentes. III. No caso dos autos, o sinal vis?vel e permanente, consubstanciador da apar?ncia da servid?o, ? a exist?ncia de uma passagem com a largura de cerca de dois metros e extens?o de oito metros a que, antes de bloqueada pelos r?us, os autores acediam atrav?s de um port?o (ou portal) de comunica??o aramado, situado igualmente no terreno dos r?us.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 107\\\/19.0T8CBA.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-23T17:07:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 107\\\/19.0T8CBA.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 107\/19.0T8CBA.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 107\/19.0T8CBA.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13","og_description":"Relator: MARIA DA GRA?A TRIGO. I. Lida e interpretada a decis?o recorrida, n?o se vislumbra qualquer v?cio na constru??o l?gica da mesma, tendo o tribunal a quo afirmado, simplesmente, que, tendo por refer?ncia a mat?ria de facto dada como provada, existiam elementos bastantes para qualificar a servid?o em causa nos autos como sendo aparente; saber se o tribunal decidiu bem ou mal ? mat?ria que se coloca no n?vel do eventual erro de julgamento e n?o ao n?vel da invocada nulidade. II. Como resulta do regime dos n.os 1 e 2 do art. 1548.? do CC, para que uma servid?o seja aparente, e para que possa ser adquirida por usucapi?o, deve revelar-se atrav?s de sinais vis?veis e permanentes. III. No caso dos autos, o sinal vis?vel e permanente, consubstanciador da apar?ncia da servid?o, ? a exist?ncia de uma passagem com a largura de cerca de dois metros e extens?o de oito metros a que, antes de bloqueada pelos r?us, os autores acediam atrav?s de um port?o (ou portal) de comunica??o aramado, situado igualmente no terreno dos r?us.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 107\/19.0T8CBA.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-23T17:07:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-107-19-0t8cba-e1-s1-2022-07-13\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 107\/19.0T8CBA.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-07-13"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/662332","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=662332"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=662332"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=662332"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=662332"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=662332"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=662332"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=662332"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=662332"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}