{"id":664578,"date":"2026-04-23T22:54:33","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T20:54:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T22:54:33","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T20:54:33","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 381\/09.0TBMNC.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-21"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: LUIS ESP?RITO SANTO. I — A decis?o sobre a mat?ria incidental prevista nos arts. 840.? e 841.? do CPC (que tem a ver com a possibilidade de um terceiro, antes de se proceder ? venda executiva, lavrar protesto invocando direito incompat?vel com a transmiss?o) reveste natureza eminentemente processual e respeita unicamente ? tramita??o da ac??o executiva, em que se insere em termos interlocut?rios. II — Com efeito, a decis?o recorrida em apre?o consubstancia-se t?o somente no indeferimento da pretens?o processual de invoca??o de protesto pela reivindica??o da coisa a vender a qual, em momento algum, pode ser juridicamente equiparada ao conhecimento de m?rito de uma ac??o aut?noma de natureza declarativa (n?o sendo, manifestamente, suscept?vel, nestas circunst?ncias, de ser configurada como tal). III — Logo, a presente revista n?o ? admiss?vel, nos precisos termos do art. 854.? do CPC, n?o sendo ainda admiss?vel in casu revista excepcional dado a decis?o recorrida n?o comportar, por sua natureza, recurso para o STJ.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: LUIS ESP?RITO SANTO. I — A decis?o sobre a mat?ria incidental prevista nos arts. 840.? e 841.? do CPC (que tem a ver com a possibilidade de um terceiro, antes de se proceder ? venda executiva, lavrar protesto invocando direito incompat?vel com a transmiss?o) reveste natureza eminentemente processual e respeita unicamente ? tramita??o da ac??o executiva, em que se insere em termos interlocut?rios. II — Com efeito, a decis?o recorrida em apre?o consubstancia-se t?o somente no indeferimento da pretens?o processual de invoca??o de protesto pela reivindica??o da coisa a vender a qual, em momento algum, pode ser juridicamente equiparada ao conhecimento de m?rito de uma ac??o aut?noma de natureza declarativa (n?o sendo, manifestamente, suscept?vel, nestas circunst?ncias, de ser configurada como tal). III — Logo, a presente revista n?o ? admiss?vel, nos precisos termos do art. 854.? do CPC, n?o sendo ainda admiss?vel in casu revista excepcional dado a decis?o recorrida n?o comportar, por sua natureza, recurso para o STJ.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8887],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-664578","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-6-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 381\/09.0TBMNC.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 381\/09.0TBMNC.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-21\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: LUIS ESP?RITO SANTO. I - A decis?o sobre a mat?ria incidental prevista nos arts. 840.? e 841.? do CPC (que tem a ver com a possibilidade de um terceiro, antes de se proceder ? venda executiva, lavrar protesto invocando direito incompat?vel com a transmiss?o) reveste natureza eminentemente processual e respeita unicamente ? tramita??o da ac??o executiva, em que se insere em termos interlocut?rios. II - Com efeito, a decis?o recorrida em apre?o consubstancia-se t?o somente no indeferimento da pretens?o processual de invoca??o de protesto pela reivindica??o da coisa a vender a qual, em momento algum, pode ser juridicamente equiparada ao conhecimento de m?rito de uma ac??o aut?noma de natureza declarativa (n?o sendo, manifestamente, suscept?vel, nestas circunst?ncias, de ser configurada como tal). III - Logo, a presente revista n?o ? admiss?vel, nos precisos termos do art. 854.? do CPC, n?o sendo ainda admiss?vel in casu revista excepcional dado a decis?o recorrida n?o comportar, por sua natureza, recurso para o STJ.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 381\\\/09.0TBMNC.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-23T20:54:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 381\\\/09.0TBMNC.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-21\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 381\/09.0TBMNC.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 381\/09.0TBMNC.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-21","og_description":"Relator: LUIS ESP?RITO SANTO. I - A decis?o sobre a mat?ria incidental prevista nos arts. 840.? e 841.? do CPC (que tem a ver com a possibilidade de um terceiro, antes de se proceder ? venda executiva, lavrar protesto invocando direito incompat?vel com a transmiss?o) reveste natureza eminentemente processual e respeita unicamente ? tramita??o da ac??o executiva, em que se insere em termos interlocut?rios. II - Com efeito, a decis?o recorrida em apre?o consubstancia-se t?o somente no indeferimento da pretens?o processual de invoca??o de protesto pela reivindica??o da coisa a vender a qual, em momento algum, pode ser juridicamente equiparada ao conhecimento de m?rito de uma ac??o aut?noma de natureza declarativa (n?o sendo, manifestamente, suscept?vel, nestas circunst?ncias, de ser configurada como tal). III - Logo, a presente revista n?o ? admiss?vel, nos precisos termos do art. 854.? do CPC, n?o sendo ainda admiss?vel in casu revista excepcional dado a decis?o recorrida n?o comportar, por sua natureza, recurso para o STJ.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 381\/09.0TBMNC.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-21 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-23T20:54:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-381-09-0tbmnc-g1-s1-2022-06-21\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 381\/09.0TBMNC.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-06-21"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/664578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=664578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=664578"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=664578"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=664578"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=664578"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=664578"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=664578"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=664578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}