{"id":665996,"date":"2026-04-24T00:49:37","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T22:49:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\/"},"modified":"2026-05-13T03:22:12","modified_gmt":"2026-05-13T01:22:12","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 70\/18.5ZFLSB-B.L2.S1 \u2013 2022-06-08"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I &#8212; O fundamento da al. b) do n.\u00ba 1 do art. 449.\u00ba do CPP exige que haja novos factos ou novos meios de prova e que deles decorra uma d\u00favida grave sobre a justi\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o; trata-se de dois requisitos cumulativos, e convergentes no que respeita a uma intensidade elevada do grau de d\u00favida sobre a justi\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o. II &#8212; Os factos e\/ou as provas t\u00eam de ser novos, no sentido de desconhecidos do tribunal e do arguido ao tempo do julgamento, derivando a sua n\u00e3o apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o oportuna desse desconhecimento ou, no limite, duma real impossibilidade de apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o da prova em causa em julgamento; e a d\u00favida sobre a justi\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o tem de ser s\u00e9ria e consistente. III &#8212; \u00c9 claramente infundado o pedido de revis\u00e3o em que o recorrente se limita a afirmar a injusti\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o, pretendendo a reinquiri\u00e7\u00e3o de pessoas j\u00e1 ouvidas em julgamento, para que lhes sejam colocadas perguntas que n\u00e3o o ter\u00e3o sido no momento pr\u00f3prio.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/e66550dd6084b24b802588610031bf6d?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I &#8212; O fundamento da al. b) do n.\u00ba 1 do art. 449.\u00ba do CPP exige que haja novos factos ou novos meios de prova e que deles decorra uma d\u00favida grave sobre a justi\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o; trata-se de dois requisitos cumulativos, e convergentes no que respeita a uma intensidade elevada do grau de d\u00favida sobre a justi\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o. II &#8212; Os factos e\/ou as provas t\u00eam de ser novos, no sentido de desconhecidos do tribunal e do arguido ao tempo do julgamento, derivando a sua n\u00e3o apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o oportuna desse desconhecimento ou, no limite, duma real impossibilidade de apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o da prova em causa em julgamento; e a d\u00favida sobre a justi\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o tem de ser s\u00e9ria e consistente. III &#8212; \u00c9 claramente infundado o pedido de revis\u00e3o em que o recorrente se limita a afirmar a injusti\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o, pretendendo a reinquiri\u00e7\u00e3o de pessoas j\u00e1 ouvidas em julgamento, para que lhes sejam colocadas perguntas que n\u00e3o o ter\u00e3o sido no momento pr\u00f3prio.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8484],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7774,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-665996","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-3-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.6 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 70\/18.5ZFLSB-B.L2.S1 \u2013 2022-06-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 70\/18.5ZFLSB-B.L2.S1 \u2013 2022-06-08\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I - O fundamento da al. b) do n.\u00ba 1 do art. 449.\u00ba do CPP exige que haja novos factos ou novos meios de prova e que deles decorra uma d\u00favida grave sobre a justi\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o; trata-se de dois requisitos cumulativos, e convergentes no que respeita a uma intensidade elevada do grau de d\u00favida sobre a justi\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o. II - Os factos e\/ou as provas t\u00eam de ser novos, no sentido de desconhecidos do tribunal e do arguido ao tempo do julgamento, derivando a sua n\u00e3o apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o oportuna desse desconhecimento ou, no limite, duma real impossibilidade de apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o da prova em causa em julgamento; e a d\u00favida sobre a justi\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o tem de ser s\u00e9ria e consistente. III - \u00c9 claramente infundado o pedido de revis\u00e3o em que o recorrente se limita a afirmar a injusti\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o, pretendendo a reinquiri\u00e7\u00e3o de pessoas j\u00e1 ouvidas em julgamento, para que lhes sejam colocadas perguntas que n\u00e3o o ter\u00e3o sido no momento pr\u00f3prio.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-13T01:22:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 70\\\/18.5ZFLSB-B.L2.S1 \u2013 2022-06-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-23T22:49:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-13T01:22:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 70\\\/18.5ZFLSB-B.L2.S1 \u2013 2022-06-08\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 70\/18.5ZFLSB-B.L2.S1 \u2013 2022-06-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 70\/18.5ZFLSB-B.L2.S1 \u2013 2022-06-08","og_description":"Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I - O fundamento da al. b) do n.\u00ba 1 do art. 449.\u00ba do CPP exige que haja novos factos ou novos meios de prova e que deles decorra uma d\u00favida grave sobre a justi\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o; trata-se de dois requisitos cumulativos, e convergentes no que respeita a uma intensidade elevada do grau de d\u00favida sobre a justi\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o. II - Os factos e\/ou as provas t\u00eam de ser novos, no sentido de desconhecidos do tribunal e do arguido ao tempo do julgamento, derivando a sua n\u00e3o apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o oportuna desse desconhecimento ou, no limite, duma real impossibilidade de apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o da prova em causa em julgamento; e a d\u00favida sobre a justi\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o tem de ser s\u00e9ria e consistente. III - \u00c9 claramente infundado o pedido de revis\u00e3o em que o recorrente se limita a afirmar a injusti\u00e7a da condena\u00e7\u00e3o, pretendendo a reinquiri\u00e7\u00e3o de pessoas j\u00e1 ouvidas em julgamento, para que lhes sejam colocadas perguntas que n\u00e3o o ter\u00e3o sido no momento pr\u00f3prio.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-13T01:22:12+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 70\/18.5ZFLSB-B.L2.S1 \u2013 2022-06-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-23T22:49:37+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-13T01:22:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-70-18-5zflsb-b-l2-s1-2022-06-08\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 70\/18.5ZFLSB-B.L2.S1 \u2013 2022-06-08"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/665996","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=665996"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=665996"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=665996"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=665996"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=665996"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=665996"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=665996"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=665996"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}