{"id":666838,"date":"2026-04-24T02:16:25","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T00:16:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T02:16:25","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T00:16:25","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3025\/20.6T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-24"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: MANUEL CAPELO. I ? Incorrem em mora os contraentes que estando obrigado pelo contrato promessa a marcarem a escritura do contrato definitivo dentro de um prazo certo o n?o fazem. II ? A convers?o da mora em incumprimento definitivo realiza-se atrav?s de interpela??o admonit?ria atrav?s da qual o credor comunica ao devedor a intima??o para o cumprimento da obriga??o de marcar a escritura; fixa um termo perent?rio para o efeito e adverte para a comina??o de se considerar definitivamente incumprida a obriga??o de marca??o da escritura se n?o for observada dentro daquele prazo, sendo nos termos do art. 808.?, n.? 1, 2.? parte, do C?digo Civil que se aprecia a razoabilidade do prazo fixado; III O contrato-promessa mostra-se valida e tacitamente resolvido quando realizada em termos regulares a interpela??o admonit?ria, que cont?m a comina??o da extin??o do contrato condicionada ? inobserv?ncia do prazo fixado, a condi??o estabelecida se considera verificada; IV — Assente que, ? data da outorga da escritura atrav?s da qual procederam os r?us ? venda do im?vel a terceiro, havia j? ocorrido o incumprimento definitivo pelos autores do contrato-promessa, bem como a resolu??o do neg?cio, operada por declara??o extrajudicial t?cita dos r?us, n?o se verifica o incumprimento do contrato-promessa pelos promitentes-vendedores.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: MANUEL CAPELO. I ? Incorrem em mora os contraentes que estando obrigado pelo contrato promessa a marcarem a escritura do contrato definitivo dentro de um prazo certo o n?o fazem. II ? A convers?o da mora em incumprimento definitivo realiza-se atrav?s de interpela??o admonit?ria atrav?s da qual o credor comunica ao devedor a intima??o para o cumprimento da obriga??o de marcar a escritura; fixa um termo perent?rio para o efeito e adverte para a comina??o de se considerar definitivamente incumprida a obriga??o de marca??o da escritura se n?o for observada dentro daquele prazo, sendo nos termos do art. 808.?, n.? 1, 2.? parte, do C?digo Civil que se aprecia a razoabilidade do prazo fixado; III O contrato-promessa mostra-se valida e tacitamente resolvido quando realizada em termos regulares a interpela??o admonit?ria, que cont?m a comina??o da extin??o do contrato condicionada ? inobserv?ncia do prazo fixado, a condi??o estabelecida se considera verificada; IV — Assente que, ? data da outorga da escritura atrav?s da qual procederam os r?us ? venda do im?vel a terceiro, havia j? ocorrido o incumprimento definitivo pelos autores do contrato-promessa, bem como a resolu??o do neg?cio, operada por declara??o extrajudicial t?cita dos r?us, n?o se verifica o incumprimento do contrato-promessa pelos promitentes-vendedores.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8713],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-666838","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-7-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3025\/20.6T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-24 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3025\/20.6T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-24\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: MANUEL CAPELO. I ? Incorrem em mora os contraentes que estando obrigado pelo contrato promessa a marcarem a escritura do contrato definitivo dentro de um prazo certo o n?o fazem. II ? A convers?o da mora em incumprimento definitivo realiza-se atrav?s de interpela??o admonit?ria atrav?s da qual o credor comunica ao devedor a intima??o para o cumprimento da obriga??o de marcar a escritura; fixa um termo perent?rio para o efeito e adverte para a comina??o de se considerar definitivamente incumprida a obriga??o de marca??o da escritura se n?o for observada dentro daquele prazo, sendo nos termos do art. 808.?, n.? 1, 2.? parte, do C?digo Civil que se aprecia a razoabilidade do prazo fixado; III O contrato-promessa mostra-se valida e tacitamente resolvido quando realizada em termos regulares a interpela??o admonit?ria, que cont?m a comina??o da extin??o do contrato condicionada ? inobserv?ncia do prazo fixado, a condi??o estabelecida se considera verificada; IV - Assente que, ? data da outorga da escritura atrav?s da qual procederam os r?us ? venda do im?vel a terceiro, havia j? ocorrido o incumprimento definitivo pelos autores do contrato-promessa, bem como a resolu??o do neg?cio, operada por declara??o extrajudicial t?cita dos r?us, n?o se verifica o incumprimento do contrato-promessa pelos promitentes-vendedores.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3025\\\/20.6T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-24 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T00:16:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3025\\\/20.6T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-24\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3025\/20.6T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-24 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3025\/20.6T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-24","og_description":"Relator: MANUEL CAPELO. I ? Incorrem em mora os contraentes que estando obrigado pelo contrato promessa a marcarem a escritura do contrato definitivo dentro de um prazo certo o n?o fazem. II ? A convers?o da mora em incumprimento definitivo realiza-se atrav?s de interpela??o admonit?ria atrav?s da qual o credor comunica ao devedor a intima??o para o cumprimento da obriga??o de marcar a escritura; fixa um termo perent?rio para o efeito e adverte para a comina??o de se considerar definitivamente incumprida a obriga??o de marca??o da escritura se n?o for observada dentro daquele prazo, sendo nos termos do art. 808.?, n.? 1, 2.? parte, do C?digo Civil que se aprecia a razoabilidade do prazo fixado; III O contrato-promessa mostra-se valida e tacitamente resolvido quando realizada em termos regulares a interpela??o admonit?ria, que cont?m a comina??o da extin??o do contrato condicionada ? inobserv?ncia do prazo fixado, a condi??o estabelecida se considera verificada; IV - Assente que, ? data da outorga da escritura atrav?s da qual procederam os r?us ? venda do im?vel a terceiro, havia j? ocorrido o incumprimento definitivo pelos autores do contrato-promessa, bem como a resolu??o do neg?cio, operada por declara??o extrajudicial t?cita dos r?us, n?o se verifica o incumprimento do contrato-promessa pelos promitentes-vendedores.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3025\/20.6T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-24 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:16:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3025-20-6t8far-e1-s1-2022-05-24\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3025\/20.6T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-24"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/666838","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=666838"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=666838"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=666838"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=666838"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=666838"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=666838"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=666838"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=666838"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}