{"id":667094,"date":"2026-04-24T02:49:50","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T00:49:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T02:49:50","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T00:49:50","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 9492\/05.0TDLSB-N.S1 \u2013 2022-05-19"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: LEONOR FURTADO. I — Para a admissibilidade de recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o ao abrigo da al. e), do n.? 1, do art. 449.?, do CPP, n?o basta que possam ter servido de fundamento ? condena??o ?provas proibidas?, sendo ainda necess?rio que tal qualifica??o resulte da descoberta de factos ou circunst?ncias que n?o constassem do processo no momento do tr?nsito em julgado da senten?a a rever. II — As decis?es do TC em recurso de fiscaliza??o concreta de constitucionalidade apenas produzem efeitos jur?dicos no processo em que s?o proferidas. III — A emerg?ncia de um ac?rd?o do TC, proferido em recurso de fiscaliza??o concreta noutro processo, julgando inconstitucional o sentido normativo que permitiu a utiliza??o em processo penal de provas obtidas em procedimento de inspec??o tribut?ria, n?o constitui facto novo para concess?o da revis?o de senten?a penal transitada em julgado que tenha valorado provas em id?nticas circunst?ncias. IV — A ?descoberta? de um entendimento proclamado pelo TC apenas poder?, ou n?o, permitir considerar estar-se perante um erro de julgamento, mas imposs?vel de ser sindicado em sede de um recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: LEONOR FURTADO. I — Para a admissibilidade de recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o ao abrigo da al. e), do n.? 1, do art. 449.?, do CPP, n?o basta que possam ter servido de fundamento ? condena??o ?provas proibidas?, sendo ainda necess?rio que tal qualifica??o resulte da descoberta de factos ou circunst?ncias que n?o constassem do processo no momento do tr?nsito em julgado da senten?a a rever. II — As decis?es do TC em recurso de fiscaliza??o concreta de constitucionalidade apenas produzem efeitos jur?dicos no processo em que s?o proferidas. III — A emerg?ncia de um ac?rd?o do TC, proferido em recurso de fiscaliza??o concreta noutro processo, julgando inconstitucional o sentido normativo que permitiu a utiliza??o em processo penal de provas obtidas em procedimento de inspec??o tribut?ria, n?o constitui facto novo para concess?o da revis?o de senten?a penal transitada em julgado que tenha valorado provas em id?nticas circunst?ncias. IV — A ?descoberta? de um entendimento proclamado pelo TC apenas poder?, ou n?o, permitir considerar estar-se perante um erro de julgamento, mas imposs?vel de ser sindicado em sede de um recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-667094","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 9492\/05.0TDLSB-N.S1 \u2013 2022-05-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 9492\/05.0TDLSB-N.S1 \u2013 2022-05-19\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: LEONOR FURTADO. I - Para a admissibilidade de recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o ao abrigo da al. e), do n.? 1, do art. 449.?, do CPP, n?o basta que possam ter servido de fundamento ? condena??o ?provas proibidas?, sendo ainda necess?rio que tal qualifica??o resulte da descoberta de factos ou circunst?ncias que n?o constassem do processo no momento do tr?nsito em julgado da senten?a a rever. II - As decis?es do TC em recurso de fiscaliza??o concreta de constitucionalidade apenas produzem efeitos jur?dicos no processo em que s?o proferidas. III - A emerg?ncia de um ac?rd?o do TC, proferido em recurso de fiscaliza??o concreta noutro processo, julgando inconstitucional o sentido normativo que permitiu a utiliza??o em processo penal de provas obtidas em procedimento de inspec??o tribut?ria, n?o constitui facto novo para concess?o da revis?o de senten?a penal transitada em julgado que tenha valorado provas em id?nticas circunst?ncias. IV - A ?descoberta? de um entendimento proclamado pelo TC apenas poder?, ou n?o, permitir considerar estar-se perante um erro de julgamento, mas imposs?vel de ser sindicado em sede de um recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 9492\\\/05.0TDLSB-N.S1 \u2013 2022-05-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T00:49:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 9492\\\/05.0TDLSB-N.S1 \u2013 2022-05-19\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 9492\/05.0TDLSB-N.S1 \u2013 2022-05-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 9492\/05.0TDLSB-N.S1 \u2013 2022-05-19","og_description":"Relator: LEONOR FURTADO. I - Para a admissibilidade de recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o ao abrigo da al. e), do n.? 1, do art. 449.?, do CPP, n?o basta que possam ter servido de fundamento ? condena??o ?provas proibidas?, sendo ainda necess?rio que tal qualifica??o resulte da descoberta de factos ou circunst?ncias que n?o constassem do processo no momento do tr?nsito em julgado da senten?a a rever. II - As decis?es do TC em recurso de fiscaliza??o concreta de constitucionalidade apenas produzem efeitos jur?dicos no processo em que s?o proferidas. III - A emerg?ncia de um ac?rd?o do TC, proferido em recurso de fiscaliza??o concreta noutro processo, julgando inconstitucional o sentido normativo que permitiu a utiliza??o em processo penal de provas obtidas em procedimento de inspec??o tribut?ria, n?o constitui facto novo para concess?o da revis?o de senten?a penal transitada em julgado que tenha valorado provas em id?nticas circunst?ncias. IV - A ?descoberta? de um entendimento proclamado pelo TC apenas poder?, ou n?o, permitir considerar estar-se perante um erro de julgamento, mas imposs?vel de ser sindicado em sede de um recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 9492\/05.0TDLSB-N.S1 \u2013 2022-05-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-24T00:49:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-9492-05-0tdlsb-n-s1-2022-05-19\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 9492\/05.0TDLSB-N.S1 \u2013 2022-05-19"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/667094","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=667094"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=667094"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=667094"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=667094"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=667094"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=667094"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=667094"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=667094"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}