{"id":668177,"date":"2026-04-24T04:30:00","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T02:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T04:30:00","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T02:30:00","slug":"tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral suisse, 16 mai 2022, n\u00b0 6B 259-2022"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Bundesgericht<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral<\/p>\n<p>Tribunale federale<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal federal<\/p>\n<p>6B_259\/2022<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eat du 16 mai 2022<\/p>\n<p>Cour de droit p\u00e9nal<\/p>\n<p>Composition<\/p>\n<p>M. le Juge f\u00e9d\u00e9ral Denys, Juge pr\u00e9sidant.<\/p>\n<p>Greffier : M. Dyens.<\/p>\n<p>Participants \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure<\/p>\n<p>A.A.________,<\/p>\n<p>recourant,<\/p>\n<p>contre<\/p>\n<p>Minist\u00e8re public central du canton de Vaud, avenue de Longemalle 1, 1020 Renens VD,<\/p>\n<p>intim\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Objet<\/p>\n<p>Ordonnance de non-entr\u00e9e en mati\u00e8re (vol; dommages<\/p>\n<p>\u00e0 la propri\u00e9t\u00e9); d\u00e9faut de paiement de l&#039;avance de frais,<\/p>\n<p>recours contre l&#039;arr\u00eat du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud, Chambre des recours p\u00e9nale, du 2 f\u00e9vrier 2022<\/p>\n<p>(n\u00b0 55 PE21.017845-GMT).<\/p>\n<p>Consid\u00e9rant en fait et en droit :<\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>Par arr\u00eat du 2 f\u00e9vrier 2022, la Chambre des recours p\u00e9nale du Tribunal cantonal vaudois a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 irrecevable le recours interjet\u00e9 par A.A.________ contre l&#039;ordonnance de non-entr\u00e9e en mati\u00e8re rendue le 4 novembre 2021 par le Minist\u00e8re public de l&#039;arrondissement du Nord vaudois. Dite ordonnance faisait suite \u00e0 la plainte d\u00e9pos\u00e9e le 26 juillet 2021 par A.A.________ \u00e0 l&#039;encontre de B.A.________, pour vol et dommages \u00e0 la propri\u00e9t\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>A.A.________ forme un recours en mati\u00e8re p\u00e9nale au Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral \u00e0 l&#039;encontre de l&#039;arr\u00eat pr\u00e9cit\u00e9. Il sollicite le b\u00e9n\u00e9fice de l&#039;assistance judiciaire.<\/p>\n<p>3.<\/p>\n<p>Selon l&#039;art. 42 al. 1 LTF, les m\u00e9moires de recours au Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral doivent indiquer les conclusions, les motifs et les moyens de preuves, et \u00eatre sign\u00e9s. En particulier, le recourant doit motiver son recours en exposant succinctement en quoi la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e viole le droit (cf. art. 42 al. 2 LTF). Pour satisfaire \u00e0 cette exigence, il appartient au recourant de discuter au moins bri\u00e8vement les consid\u00e9rants de la d\u00e9cision litigieuse (ATF 140 III 86 consid. 2 p. 88 ss et 115 consid. 2 p. 116 s.); en particulier, la motivation doit \u00eatre topique, c&#039;est-\u00e0-dire se rapporter \u00e0 la question juridique tranch\u00e9e par l&#039;autorit\u00e9 cantonale (ATF 123 V 335; arr\u00eat 6B_970\/2017 du 17 octobre 2017 consid. 4). De plus, le Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral est li\u00e9 par les faits retenus par l&#039;arr\u00eat entrepris (art. 105 al. 1 LTF), sous les r\u00e9serves d\u00e9coulant des art. 97 al. 1 et 105 al. 2 LTF, soit pour l&#039;essentiel de l&#039;arbitraire (art. 9 Cst.; sur cette notion, cf. ATF 147 IV 73 consid. 4.1.2 p. 81; 143 IV 241 consid. 2.3.1 p. 244) dans la constatation des faits. Le Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral ne conna\u00eet de la violation des droits fondamentaux que si ce moyen est invoqu\u00e9 et motiv\u00e9 par le recourant (art. 106 al. 2 LTF), c&#039;est-\u00e0-dire s&#039;il a \u00e9t\u00e9 express\u00e9ment soulev\u00e9 et expos\u00e9 de mani\u00e8re claire et d\u00e9taill\u00e9e (ATF 143 IV 500 consid. 1.1 p. 503). Les critiques de nature appellatoire sont irrecevables (ATF 147 IV 73 consid. 4.1.2 p. 81; 146 IV 114 consid. 2.1 p. 118; 145 IV 154 consid. 1.1 p. 156).<\/p>\n<p>En l&#039;esp\u00e8ce, il ressort de l&#039;arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 que, par avis du 30 novembre 2021 adress\u00e9 sous pli recommand\u00e9, la direction de la proc\u00e9dure a imparti au recourant un d\u00e9lai au 20 d\u00e9cembre 2021 pour effectuer un d\u00e9p\u00f4t de 550 fr., tout en lui signifiant qu&#039;\u00e0 d\u00e9faut de paiement des s\u00fbret\u00e9s en temps utile, il ne serait pas entr\u00e9 en mati\u00e8re sur son recours. Le recourant avait, selon le suivi des envois postaux, \u00e9t\u00e9 avis\u00e9 en date du 1 er d\u00e9cembre 2021 qu&#039;un pli recommand\u00e9 pouvait \u00eatre retir\u00e9. A l&#039;issue du d\u00e9lai de garde, le pli en question n&#039;avait pas \u00e9t\u00e9 retir\u00e9 et \u00e9tait revenu au greffe de la cour cantonale avec la mention &quot;non r\u00e9clam\u00e9&quot;. Renvoyant ensuite \u00e0 la teneur des art. 85 al. 4 let. a CPP, 91 al. 5 CPP et 383 al. 1 et 2 CPP, la cour cantonale a en substance retenu que le recourant n&#039;avait pas retir\u00e9 le pli contenant l&#039;avis relatif au versement de s\u00fbret\u00e9s, que celui-ci \u00e9tait r\u00e9put\u00e9 avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9 le 9 d\u00e9cembre 2021 \u00e0 l&#039;issue du d\u00e9lai de garde et qu&#039;il devait s&#039;attendre \u00e0 recevoir des communications de la part de l&#039;autorit\u00e9 en rapport avec l&#039;affaire en cours. D\u00e8s lors qu&#039;il n&#039;avait pas fourni les s\u00fbret\u00e9s requises dans le d\u00e9lai imparti, son recours \u00e9tait irrecevable.<\/p>\n<p>Devant le Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral, le recourant discute librement le fond de la cause mais ne d\u00e9veloppe aucun grief sur la motivation cantonale relative au motif d&#039;irrecevabilit\u00e9 retenu, en vertu des art. 85 al. 4 let. a CPP, 91 al. 5 CPP et 383 al. 1 et 2 CPP. Son m\u00e9moire est ainsi exempt de toute discussion destin\u00e9e \u00e0 d\u00e9montrer en quoi celle-ci violerait le droit f\u00e9d\u00e9ral \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard. Il s&#039;ensuit que, faute de satisfaire aux conditions de recevabilit\u00e9 d&#039;un recours en mati\u00e8re p\u00e9nale au Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (cf. art. 42 al. 2 et 106 al. 2 LTF), le recours doit \u00eatre d\u00e9clar\u00e9 irrecevable en application de l&#039;art. 108 al. 1 let. b LTF.<\/p>\n<p>4.<\/p>\n<p>Le recours est irrecevable. Comme il \u00e9tait vou\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#039;\u00e9chec, l&#039;assistance judiciaire ne peut \u00eatre accord\u00e9e (art. 64 al. 1 LTF). Le recourant, qui succombe, supporte les frais judiciaires (art. 66 al. 1 LTF), fix\u00e9s en tenant compte de sa situation.<\/p>\n<p>Par ces motifs, le Juge pr\u00e9sidant prononce :<\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>Le recours est irrecevable.<\/p>\n<p>2.<\/p>\n<p>La demande d&#039;assistance judiciaire est rejet\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>3.<\/p>\n<p>Les frais judiciaires, arr\u00eat\u00e9s \u00e0 500 fr., sont mis \u00e0 la charge du recourant.<\/p>\n<p>4.<\/p>\n<p>Le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat est communiqu\u00e9 aux parties et au Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud, Chambre des recours p\u00e9nale.<\/p>\n<p>Lausanne, le 16 mai 2022<\/p>\n<p>Au nom de la Cour de droit p\u00e9nal<\/p>\n<p>du Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral suisse<\/p>\n<p>Le Juge pr\u00e9sidant : Denys<\/p>\n<p>Le Greffier : Dyens<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/search.bger.ch\/ext\/eurospider\/live\/fr\/php\/aza\/http\/index.php?lang=fr&#038;type=highlight_simple_query&#038;page=7&#038;from_date=&#038;to_date=&#038;sort=relevance&#038;insertion_date=&#038;top_subcollection_aza=all&#038;query_words=propriete&#038;rank=64&#038;azaclir=aza&#038;highlight_docid=aza%3A%2F%2F16-05-2022-6B_259-2022&#038;number_of_ranks=6365\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Source officielle Tribunal federal suisse. Contenu HTML public, PDF non garanti en version gratuite.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bundesgericht Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral Tribunale federale Tribunal federal 6B_259\/2022 Arr\u00eat du 16 mai 2022 Cour de droit p\u00e9nal Composition M. le Juge f\u00e9d\u00e9ral Denys, Juge pr\u00e9sidant. Greffier : M. Dyens. Participants \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure A.A.________, recourant, contre Minist\u00e8re public central du canton de Vaud, avenue de Longemalle 1, 1020 Renens VD, intim\u00e9. Objet Ordonnance de non-entr\u00e9e&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[9676],"kji_court":[9677],"kji_chamber":[10143],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[9799,9679,9680,7636],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-668177","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-suisse","kji_court-tribunal-federal-suisse","kji_chamber-cour-de-droit-penal","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-bundesgericht","kji_keyword-federal","kji_keyword-suisse","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral suisse, 16 mai 2022, n\u00b0 6B 259-2022 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral suisse, 16 mai 2022, n\u00b0 6B 259-2022\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bundesgericht Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral Tribunale federale Tribunal federal 6B_259\/2022 Arr\u00eat du 16 mai 2022 Cour de droit p\u00e9nal Composition M. le Juge f\u00e9d\u00e9ral Denys, Juge pr\u00e9sidant. Greffier : M. Dyens. Participants \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure A.A.________, recourant, contre Minist\u00e8re public central du canton de Vaud, avenue de Longemalle 1, 1020 Renens VD, intim\u00e9. Objet Ordonnance de non-entr\u00e9e...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral suisse, 16 mai 2022, n\u00b0 6B 259-2022 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T02:30:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral suisse, 16 mai 2022, n\u00b0 6B 259-2022\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral suisse, 16 mai 2022, n\u00b0 6B 259-2022 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral suisse, 16 mai 2022, n\u00b0 6B 259-2022","og_description":"Bundesgericht Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral Tribunale federale Tribunal federal 6B_259\/2022 Arr\u00eat du 16 mai 2022 Cour de droit p\u00e9nal Composition M. le Juge f\u00e9d\u00e9ral Denys, Juge pr\u00e9sidant. Greffier : M. Dyens. Participants \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure A.A.________, recourant, contre Minist\u00e8re public central du canton de Vaud, avenue de Longemalle 1, 1020 Renens VD, intim\u00e9. Objet Ordonnance de non-entr\u00e9e...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"5 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\/","name":"Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral suisse, 16 mai 2022, n\u00b0 6B 259-2022 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-24T02:30:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-federal-suisse-16-mai-2022-n-6b-259-2022\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral suisse, 16 mai 2022, n\u00b0 6B 259-2022"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/668177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=668177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=668177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=668177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=668177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=668177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=668177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=668177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=668177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}