{"id":668634,"date":"2026-04-24T05:08:36","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T03:08:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T05:08:36","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T03:08:36","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 10000\/19.1T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-05"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: RIJO FERREIRA. I. N?o ocorre ?dupla conforme? obstativa da revista nos termos gerais se, n?o obstante tais decis?es coincidiram na decis?o de improced?ncia da ac??o, a 1? inst?ncia fundar a decis?o na autoridade de caso julgado e a Rela??o na excep??o de caso julgado. II. ? que, embora correspondendo a diferentes perspectivas do mesmo instituto jur?dico, a autoridade de caso julgado e a excep??o de caso julgado gozam de autonomia conceptual e diferencia??o de requisitos e efeitos, pelo que haver? de considerar que h? uma diferen?a essencial entre elas enquanto fundamento de id?ntica decis?o. III. Ademais, as situa??es de d?vida quanto ? verifica??o de fundamenta??o essencialmente diferente devem ser resolvidas por aplica??o do brocardo ?odiosa restringenda, favorabilia amplianda?. IV. Invocando o executado na oposi??o que deduz ? execu??o n?o s? a ocorr?ncia de circunst?ncias relacionadas com a rela??o processual da inst?ncia executiva, suscept?veis de levar ? extin??o da mesma, mas tamb?m circunst?ncias relacionadas com a vertente substantiva da obriga??o exequenda, a decis?o de m?rito proferida nesse processo, para al?m dos efeitos sobre a inst?ncia executiva constitui, nos termos gerais, caso julgado quanto ? exist?ncia, validade e exigibilidade da obriga??o exequenda (artigo 732?, n? 5, do CPC).<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: RIJO FERREIRA. I. N?o ocorre ?dupla conforme? obstativa da revista nos termos gerais se, n?o obstante tais decis?es coincidiram na decis?o de improced?ncia da ac??o, a 1? inst?ncia fundar a decis?o na autoridade de caso julgado e a Rela??o na excep??o de caso julgado. II. ? que, embora correspondendo a diferentes perspectivas do mesmo instituto jur?dico, a autoridade de caso julgado e a excep??o de caso julgado gozam de autonomia conceptual e diferencia??o de requisitos e efeitos, pelo que haver? de considerar que h? uma diferen?a essencial entre elas enquanto fundamento de id?ntica decis?o. III. Ademais, as situa??es de d?vida quanto ? verifica??o de fundamenta??o essencialmente diferente devem ser resolvidas por aplica??o do brocardo ?odiosa restringenda, favorabilia amplianda?. IV. Invocando o executado na oposi??o que deduz ? execu??o n?o s? a ocorr?ncia de circunst?ncias relacionadas com a rela??o processual da inst?ncia executiva, suscept?veis de levar ? extin??o da mesma, mas tamb?m circunst?ncias relacionadas com a vertente substantiva da obriga??o exequenda, a decis?o de m?rito proferida nesse processo, para al?m dos efeitos sobre a inst?ncia executiva constitui, nos termos gerais, caso julgado quanto ? exist?ncia, validade e exigibilidade da obriga??o exequenda (artigo 732?, n? 5, do CPC).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":4139,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8784],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-668634","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-2-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 10000\/19.1T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-05 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 10000\/19.1T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-05\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: RIJO FERREIRA. I. N?o ocorre ?dupla conforme? obstativa da revista nos termos gerais se, n?o obstante tais decis?es coincidiram na decis?o de improced?ncia da ac??o, a 1? inst?ncia fundar a decis?o na autoridade de caso julgado e a Rela??o na excep??o de caso julgado. II. ? que, embora correspondendo a diferentes perspectivas do mesmo instituto jur?dico, a autoridade de caso julgado e a excep??o de caso julgado gozam de autonomia conceptual e diferencia??o de requisitos e efeitos, pelo que haver? de considerar que h? uma diferen?a essencial entre elas enquanto fundamento de id?ntica decis?o. III. Ademais, as situa??es de d?vida quanto ? verifica??o de fundamenta??o essencialmente diferente devem ser resolvidas por aplica??o do brocardo ?odiosa restringenda, favorabilia amplianda?. IV. Invocando o executado na oposi??o que deduz ? execu??o n?o s? a ocorr?ncia de circunst?ncias relacionadas com a rela??o processual da inst?ncia executiva, suscept?veis de levar ? extin??o da mesma, mas tamb?m circunst?ncias relacionadas com a vertente substantiva da obriga??o exequenda, a decis?o de m?rito proferida nesse processo, para al?m dos efeitos sobre a inst?ncia executiva constitui, nos termos gerais, caso julgado quanto ? exist?ncia, validade e exigibilidade da obriga??o exequenda (artigo 732?, n? 5, do CPC).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 10000\\\/19.1T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-05 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/tingey-injury-law-firm-L4YGuSg0fxs-unsplash.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T03:08:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/tingey-injury-law-firm-L4YGuSg0fxs-unsplash.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/tingey-injury-law-firm-L4YGuSg0fxs-unsplash.jpg\",\"width\":4000,\"height\":6000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 10000\\\/19.1T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-05\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 10000\/19.1T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-05 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 10000\/19.1T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-05","og_description":"Relator: RIJO FERREIRA. I. N?o ocorre ?dupla conforme? obstativa da revista nos termos gerais se, n?o obstante tais decis?es coincidiram na decis?o de improced?ncia da ac??o, a 1? inst?ncia fundar a decis?o na autoridade de caso julgado e a Rela??o na excep??o de caso julgado. II. ? que, embora correspondendo a diferentes perspectivas do mesmo instituto jur?dico, a autoridade de caso julgado e a excep??o de caso julgado gozam de autonomia conceptual e diferencia??o de requisitos e efeitos, pelo que haver? de considerar que h? uma diferen?a essencial entre elas enquanto fundamento de id?ntica decis?o. III. Ademais, as situa??es de d?vida quanto ? verifica??o de fundamenta??o essencialmente diferente devem ser resolvidas por aplica??o do brocardo ?odiosa restringenda, favorabilia amplianda?. IV. Invocando o executado na oposi??o que deduz ? execu??o n?o s? a ocorr?ncia de circunst?ncias relacionadas com a rela??o processual da inst?ncia executiva, suscept?veis de levar ? extin??o da mesma, mas tamb?m circunst?ncias relacionadas com a vertente substantiva da obriga??o exequenda, a decis?o de m?rito proferida nesse processo, para al?m dos efeitos sobre a inst?ncia executiva constitui, nos termos gerais, caso julgado quanto ? exist?ncia, validade e exigibilidade da obriga??o exequenda (artigo 732?, n? 5, do CPC).","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 10000\/19.1T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-05 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/tingey-injury-law-firm-L4YGuSg0fxs-unsplash.jpg","datePublished":"2026-04-24T03:08:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/tingey-injury-law-firm-L4YGuSg0fxs-unsplash.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/tingey-injury-law-firm-L4YGuSg0fxs-unsplash.jpg","width":4000,"height":6000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-10000-19-1t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-05-05\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 10000\/19.1T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-05-05"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/668634","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4139"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=668634"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=668634"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=668634"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=668634"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=668634"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=668634"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=668634"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=668634"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}