{"id":669733,"date":"2026-04-24T06:43:48","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T04:43:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T06:43:48","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T04:43:48","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 353\/13.0PCPDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-04-27"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: TERESA F?RIA. I — Sendo embora abstratamente admiss?vel a prola??o de uma decis?o sum?ria, nos termos do disposto na al. b) do n.? 6 do art. 417.? do CPP, esta n?o dever? ter lugar em virtude de, em caso de impugna??o, sempre ter de haver uma nova aprecia??o, atrav?s de ac?rd?o proferido em confer?ncia. II — A prola??o de ac?rd?o em confer?ncia, ao inv?s de uma decis?o sum?ria, em nada fere o princ?pio do contradit?rio, mas antes ? ditado pela obedi?ncia ao princ?pio da proibi??o da pr?tica de atos in?teis ? art. 130.? do CPC ? e ao princ?pio da celeridade processual. III — O art. 118.? do CPP determina estarem as nulidades processuais sujeitas ao princ?pio da legalidade, pelo que s? podem ser qualificadas como tal as irregularidades processuais que a lei expressamente determine, sendo que inexiste qualquer previs?o na lei processual penal a cominar com a nulidade a n?o observ?ncia do disposto no art. 417.?, n.? 6, do CPP.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: TERESA F?RIA. I — Sendo embora abstratamente admiss?vel a prola??o de uma decis?o sum?ria, nos termos do disposto na al. b) do n.? 6 do art. 417.? do CPP, esta n?o dever? ter lugar em virtude de, em caso de impugna??o, sempre ter de haver uma nova aprecia??o, atrav?s de ac?rd?o proferido em confer?ncia. II — A prola??o de ac?rd?o em confer?ncia, ao inv?s de uma decis?o sum?ria, em nada fere o princ?pio do contradit?rio, mas antes ? ditado pela obedi?ncia ao princ?pio da proibi??o da pr?tica de atos in?teis ? art. 130.? do CPC ? e ao princ?pio da celeridade processual. III — O art. 118.? do CPP determina estarem as nulidades processuais sujeitas ao princ?pio da legalidade, pelo que s? podem ser qualificadas como tal as irregularidades processuais que a lei expressamente determine, sendo que inexiste qualquer previs?o na lei processual penal a cominar com a nulidade a n?o observ?ncia do disposto no art. 417.?, n.? 6, do CPP.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8484],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-669733","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-3-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 353\/13.0PCPDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-04-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 353\/13.0PCPDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-04-27\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: TERESA F?RIA. I - Sendo embora abstratamente admiss?vel a prola??o de uma decis?o sum?ria, nos termos do disposto na al. b) do n.? 6 do art. 417.? do CPP, esta n?o dever? ter lugar em virtude de, em caso de impugna??o, sempre ter de haver uma nova aprecia??o, atrav?s de ac?rd?o proferido em confer?ncia. II - A prola??o de ac?rd?o em confer?ncia, ao inv?s de uma decis?o sum?ria, em nada fere o princ?pio do contradit?rio, mas antes ? ditado pela obedi?ncia ao princ?pio da proibi??o da pr?tica de atos in?teis ? art. 130.? do CPC ? e ao princ?pio da celeridade processual. III - O art. 118.? do CPP determina estarem as nulidades processuais sujeitas ao princ?pio da legalidade, pelo que s? podem ser qualificadas como tal as irregularidades processuais que a lei expressamente determine, sendo que inexiste qualquer previs?o na lei processual penal a cominar com a nulidade a n?o observ?ncia do disposto no art. 417.?, n.? 6, do CPP.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 353\\\/13.0PCPDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-04-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T04:43:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 353\\\/13.0PCPDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-04-27\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 353\/13.0PCPDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-04-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 353\/13.0PCPDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-04-27","og_description":"Relator: TERESA F?RIA. I - Sendo embora abstratamente admiss?vel a prola??o de uma decis?o sum?ria, nos termos do disposto na al. b) do n.? 6 do art. 417.? do CPP, esta n?o dever? ter lugar em virtude de, em caso de impugna??o, sempre ter de haver uma nova aprecia??o, atrav?s de ac?rd?o proferido em confer?ncia. II - A prola??o de ac?rd?o em confer?ncia, ao inv?s de uma decis?o sum?ria, em nada fere o princ?pio do contradit?rio, mas antes ? ditado pela obedi?ncia ao princ?pio da proibi??o da pr?tica de atos in?teis ? art. 130.? do CPC ? e ao princ?pio da celeridade processual. III - O art. 118.? do CPP determina estarem as nulidades processuais sujeitas ao princ?pio da legalidade, pelo que s? podem ser qualificadas como tal as irregularidades processuais que a lei expressamente determine, sendo que inexiste qualquer previs?o na lei processual penal a cominar com a nulidade a n?o observ?ncia do disposto no art. 417.?, n.? 6, do CPP.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 353\/13.0PCPDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-04-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-24T04:43:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-353-13-0pcpdl-l1-s1-2022-04-27\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 353\/13.0PCPDL.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-04-27"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/669733","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=669733"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=669733"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=669733"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=669733"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=669733"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=669733"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=669733"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=669733"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}