{"id":671313,"date":"2026-04-24T09:43:31","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T07:43:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T09:43:31","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T07:43:31","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 505\/17.4T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-31"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: CATARINA SERRA. I. Apenas ? admiss?vel ao Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a conhecer da decis?o sobre a mat?ria de facto a t?tulo residual, com o prop?sito de garantir a observ?ncia das regras de Direito probat?rio material ou de ampliar a decis?o sobre a mat?ria de facto, conforme resulta das disposi??es do n.? 3 do artigo 674.? e do n.? 3 do artigo 682.? do CPC. II. O Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a tem ainda a possibilidade de apreciar o uso que o Tribunal da Rela??o faz dos poderes que lhe s?o conferidos pelo artigo 662.? do CPC, sendo o mau uso (uso indevido, insuficiente ou excessivo) suscept?vel de configurar viola??o da lei de processo e, portanto, de constituir fundamento do recurso de revista, nos termos do artigo 674?, n? 1, al. b), do CPC. III. N?o havendo viola??o de normas do Direito probat?rio material e tendo o Tribunal recorrido reavaliado os meios de prova sujeitos ? sua livre aprecia??o e respeitado as normas aplic?veis aos demais, reponderado as quest?es de facto em discuss?o e aquelas que por sua iniciativa considerou ser de reponderar e criado, enfim, fundadamente, uma convic??o pr?pria ou aut?noma sobre a mat?ria de facto, n?o merece a sua conduta nenhuma reprova??o.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: CATARINA SERRA. I. Apenas ? admiss?vel ao Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a conhecer da decis?o sobre a mat?ria de facto a t?tulo residual, com o prop?sito de garantir a observ?ncia das regras de Direito probat?rio material ou de ampliar a decis?o sobre a mat?ria de facto, conforme resulta das disposi??es do n.? 3 do artigo 674.? e do n.? 3 do artigo 682.? do CPC. II. O Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a tem ainda a possibilidade de apreciar o uso que o Tribunal da Rela??o faz dos poderes que lhe s?o conferidos pelo artigo 662.? do CPC, sendo o mau uso (uso indevido, insuficiente ou excessivo) suscept?vel de configurar viola??o da lei de processo e, portanto, de constituir fundamento do recurso de revista, nos termos do artigo 674?, n? 1, al. b), do CPC. III. N?o havendo viola??o de normas do Direito probat?rio material e tendo o Tribunal recorrido reavaliado os meios de prova sujeitos ? sua livre aprecia??o e respeitado as normas aplic?veis aos demais, reponderado as quest?es de facto em discuss?o e aquelas que por sua iniciativa considerou ser de reponderar e criado, enfim, fundadamente, uma convic??o pr?pria ou aut?noma sobre a mat?ria de facto, n?o merece a sua conduta nenhuma reprova??o.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8784],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-671313","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-2-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 505\/17.4T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 505\/17.4T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-31\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: CATARINA SERRA. I. Apenas ? admiss?vel ao Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a conhecer da decis?o sobre a mat?ria de facto a t?tulo residual, com o prop?sito de garantir a observ?ncia das regras de Direito probat?rio material ou de ampliar a decis?o sobre a mat?ria de facto, conforme resulta das disposi??es do n.? 3 do artigo 674.? e do n.? 3 do artigo 682.? do CPC. II. O Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a tem ainda a possibilidade de apreciar o uso que o Tribunal da Rela??o faz dos poderes que lhe s?o conferidos pelo artigo 662.? do CPC, sendo o mau uso (uso indevido, insuficiente ou excessivo) suscept?vel de configurar viola??o da lei de processo e, portanto, de constituir fundamento do recurso de revista, nos termos do artigo 674?, n? 1, al. b), do CPC. III. N?o havendo viola??o de normas do Direito probat?rio material e tendo o Tribunal recorrido reavaliado os meios de prova sujeitos ? sua livre aprecia??o e respeitado as normas aplic?veis aos demais, reponderado as quest?es de facto em discuss?o e aquelas que por sua iniciativa considerou ser de reponderar e criado, enfim, fundadamente, uma convic??o pr?pria ou aut?noma sobre a mat?ria de facto, n?o merece a sua conduta nenhuma reprova??o.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 505\\\/17.4T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T07:43:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 505\\\/17.4T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-31\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 505\/17.4T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 505\/17.4T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-31","og_description":"Relator: CATARINA SERRA. I. Apenas ? admiss?vel ao Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a conhecer da decis?o sobre a mat?ria de facto a t?tulo residual, com o prop?sito de garantir a observ?ncia das regras de Direito probat?rio material ou de ampliar a decis?o sobre a mat?ria de facto, conforme resulta das disposi??es do n.? 3 do artigo 674.? e do n.? 3 do artigo 682.? do CPC. II. O Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a tem ainda a possibilidade de apreciar o uso que o Tribunal da Rela??o faz dos poderes que lhe s?o conferidos pelo artigo 662.? do CPC, sendo o mau uso (uso indevido, insuficiente ou excessivo) suscept?vel de configurar viola??o da lei de processo e, portanto, de constituir fundamento do recurso de revista, nos termos do artigo 674?, n? 1, al. b), do CPC. III. N?o havendo viola??o de normas do Direito probat?rio material e tendo o Tribunal recorrido reavaliado os meios de prova sujeitos ? sua livre aprecia??o e respeitado as normas aplic?veis aos demais, reponderado as quest?es de facto em discuss?o e aquelas que por sua iniciativa considerou ser de reponderar e criado, enfim, fundadamente, uma convic??o pr?pria ou aut?noma sobre a mat?ria de facto, n?o merece a sua conduta nenhuma reprova??o.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 505\/17.4T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-31 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-24T07:43:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-505-17-4t8far-e1-s1-2022-03-31\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 505\/17.4T8FAR.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-31"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/671313","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=671313"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=671313"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=671313"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=671313"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=671313"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=671313"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=671313"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=671313"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}