{"id":671518,"date":"2026-04-24T10:23:47","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T08:23:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T10:23:47","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T08:23:47","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 531\/20.6T8MCN.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-29"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: JORGE DIAS. I — Em rela??o ? mat?ria de facto, o Tribunal de revista apenas aju?za se o Tribunal da Rela??o observou, quer a disciplina processual a que aludem os arts. 640 e 662, n? 1, quer o m?todo de an?lise cr?tica da prova prescrito no art. 607, n? 4, aplic?vel por for?a o disposto no art. 663, n? 2, todos do CPC, n?o podendo imiscuir-se na valora??o da prova feita pelo Tribunal da Rela??o, segundo o crit?rio da sua livre e prudente convic??o. II — N?o ? da compet?ncia do STJ, sindicar o erro na livre aprecia??o das provas, a n?o ser quando, nos termos do artigo 674, n.? 3, do CPC, a utiliza??o desse crit?rio de valora??o ofenda uma disposi??o legal expressa que exija esp?cie de prova diferente para a exist?ncia do facto ou que fixe a for?a probat?ria de determinado meio de prova. III — O dever [de fundamenta??o das senten?as] resultante da Constitui??o e da lei (CPC) tem por objetivo a explicita??o por parte do julgador acerca dos motivos pelos quais decidiu em determinado sentido, dirimindo determinado lit?gio que lhe foi colocado, de forma que os destinat?rios possam entender as raz?es da decis?o proferida e, caso o entendam, poderem sindic?-la e reagir contra a mesma.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: JORGE DIAS. I — Em rela??o ? mat?ria de facto, o Tribunal de revista apenas aju?za se o Tribunal da Rela??o observou, quer a disciplina processual a que aludem os arts. 640 e 662, n? 1, quer o m?todo de an?lise cr?tica da prova prescrito no art. 607, n? 4, aplic?vel por for?a o disposto no art. 663, n? 2, todos do CPC, n?o podendo imiscuir-se na valora??o da prova feita pelo Tribunal da Rela??o, segundo o crit?rio da sua livre e prudente convic??o. II — N?o ? da compet?ncia do STJ, sindicar o erro na livre aprecia??o das provas, a n?o ser quando, nos termos do artigo 674, n.? 3, do CPC, a utiliza??o desse crit?rio de valora??o ofenda uma disposi??o legal expressa que exija esp?cie de prova diferente para a exist?ncia do facto ou que fixe a for?a probat?ria de determinado meio de prova. III — O dever [de fundamenta??o das senten?as] resultante da Constitui??o e da lei (CPC) tem por objetivo a explicita??o por parte do julgador acerca dos motivos pelos quais decidiu em determinado sentido, dirimindo determinado lit?gio que lhe foi colocado, de forma que os destinat?rios possam entender as raz?es da decis?o proferida e, caso o entendam, poderem sindic?-la e reagir contra a mesma.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-671518","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 531\/20.6T8MCN.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 531\/20.6T8MCN.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-29\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: JORGE DIAS. I - Em rela??o ? mat?ria de facto, o Tribunal de revista apenas aju?za se o Tribunal da Rela??o observou, quer a disciplina processual a que aludem os arts. 640 e 662, n? 1, quer o m?todo de an?lise cr?tica da prova prescrito no art. 607, n? 4, aplic?vel por for?a o disposto no art. 663, n? 2, todos do CPC, n?o podendo imiscuir-se na valora??o da prova feita pelo Tribunal da Rela??o, segundo o crit?rio da sua livre e prudente convic??o. II - N?o ? da compet?ncia do STJ, sindicar o erro na livre aprecia??o das provas, a n?o ser quando, nos termos do artigo 674, n.? 3, do CPC, a utiliza??o desse crit?rio de valora??o ofenda uma disposi??o legal expressa que exija esp?cie de prova diferente para a exist?ncia do facto ou que fixe a for?a probat?ria de determinado meio de prova. III - O dever [de fundamenta??o das senten?as] resultante da Constitui??o e da lei (CPC) tem por objetivo a explicita??o por parte do julgador acerca dos motivos pelos quais decidiu em determinado sentido, dirimindo determinado lit?gio que lhe foi colocado, de forma que os destinat?rios possam entender as raz?es da decis?o proferida e, caso o entendam, poderem sindic?-la e reagir contra a mesma.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 531\\\/20.6T8MCN.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T08:23:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 531\\\/20.6T8MCN.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-29\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 531\/20.6T8MCN.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 531\/20.6T8MCN.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-29","og_description":"Relator: JORGE DIAS. I - Em rela??o ? mat?ria de facto, o Tribunal de revista apenas aju?za se o Tribunal da Rela??o observou, quer a disciplina processual a que aludem os arts. 640 e 662, n? 1, quer o m?todo de an?lise cr?tica da prova prescrito no art. 607, n? 4, aplic?vel por for?a o disposto no art. 663, n? 2, todos do CPC, n?o podendo imiscuir-se na valora??o da prova feita pelo Tribunal da Rela??o, segundo o crit?rio da sua livre e prudente convic??o. II - N?o ? da compet?ncia do STJ, sindicar o erro na livre aprecia??o das provas, a n?o ser quando, nos termos do artigo 674, n.? 3, do CPC, a utiliza??o desse crit?rio de valora??o ofenda uma disposi??o legal expressa que exija esp?cie de prova diferente para a exist?ncia do facto ou que fixe a for?a probat?ria de determinado meio de prova. III - O dever [de fundamenta??o das senten?as] resultante da Constitui??o e da lei (CPC) tem por objetivo a explicita??o por parte do julgador acerca dos motivos pelos quais decidiu em determinado sentido, dirimindo determinado lit?gio que lhe foi colocado, de forma que os destinat?rios possam entender as raz?es da decis?o proferida e, caso o entendam, poderem sindic?-la e reagir contra a mesma.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 531\/20.6T8MCN.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-24T08:23:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-531-20-6t8mcn-p1-s1-2022-03-29\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 531\/20.6T8MCN.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-03-29"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/671518","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=671518"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=671518"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=671518"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=671518"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=671518"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=671518"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=671518"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=671518"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}