{"id":672524,"date":"2026-04-24T13:25:51","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T11:25:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T13:25:51","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T11:25:51","slug":"eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:NL:HR:2022:333 Hoge Raad , 25-02-2022 \/ 21\/00553"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Inhoudsindicatie.<\/strong> Art. 81 lid 1 RO. Arbeidsrecht. Ontbinding op verzoek werkgever op de g-grond. Afwijzing verzoek werknemer om toekenning billijke vergoeding. Klachten op beide onderdelen.<\/p>\n

HOGE RAAD DER NEDERLANDEN<\/p>\n

CIVIELE KAMER<\/p>\n

Nummer 21\/00553<\/p>\n

Datum 25 februari 2022<\/p>\n

BESCHIKKING<\/p>\n

In de zaak van<\/p>\n

[verzoekster],
\nwonende te [woonplaats], Verenigde Staten van Amerika,<\/p>\n

VERZOEKSTER tot cassatie,<\/p>\n

hierna: [verzoekster],<\/p>\n

advocaat: N.T. Dempsey,<\/p>\n

tegen<\/p>\n

ABN AMRO BANK N.V.,
\ngevestigd te Amsterdam,<\/p>\n

VERWEERSTER in cassatie,<\/p>\n

hierna: ABN AMRO,<\/p>\n

advocaten: J.P. Heering en F.M. Dekker.<\/p>\n

1. Procesverloop<\/p>\n

Voor het verloop van het geding in feitelijke instanties verwijst de Hoge Raad naar:<\/p>\n

de beschikking in de zaak 7547951 EA VERZ 19-115 van de kantonrechter te Amsterdam van 18 juni 2019;<\/p>\n

de beschikking in de zaak 200.266.107\/01 van het gerechtshof Amsterdam van 10 november 2020.<\/p>\n

[verzoekster] heeft tegen de beschikking van het hof beroep in cassatie ingesteld. Het cassatierekest is aan deze beschikking gehecht en maakt daarvan deel uit.<\/p>\n

ABN AMRO heeft verzocht het beroep te verwerpen.<\/p>\n

De conclusie van de Advocaat-Generaal R.H. de Bock strekt tot verwerping van het cassatieberoep.<\/p>\n

2Beoordeling van het middel<\/h3>\n

De Hoge Raad heeft de klachten over de beschikking van het hof beoordeeld. De uitkomst hiervan is dat deze klachten niet kunnen leiden tot vernietiging van die beschikking. De Hoge Raad hoeft niet te motiveren waarom hij tot dit oordeel is gekomen. Bij de beoordeling van deze klachten is het namelijk niet nodig om antwoord te geven op vragen die van belang zijn voor de eenheid of de ontwikkeling van het recht (zie artikel 81 lid 1 van de Wet op de rechterlijke organisatie).<\/p>\n

3Beslissing<\/h3>\n

De Hoge Raad:<\/p>\n

verwerpt het beroep;<\/p>\n

veroordeelt [verzoekster] in de kosten van het geding in cassatie, tot op deze uitspraak aan de zijde van ABN AMRO begroot op \u20ac 913,07 aan verschotten en \u20ac 1.800,— voor salaris.<\/p>\n

Deze beschikking is gegeven door de raadsheren T.H. Tanja-van den Broek, als voorzitter, C.E. du Perron en S.J. Schaafsma, en in het openbaar uitgesproken door de raadsheer H.M. Wattendorff op 25 februari 2022.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Rechtspraak.nl open data, Creative Commons Zero. Volume cible 1.8M decisions.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Art. 81 lid 1 RO. Arbeidsrecht. Ontbinding op verzoek werkgever op de g-grond. Afwijzing verzoek werknemer om toekenning billijke vergoeding. Klachten op beide onderdelen.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7669],"kji_court":[7834],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7712],"kji_keyword":[11069,21074,8009,7814,8007],"kji_language":[7671],"class_list":["post-672524","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-pays-bas","kji_court-hoge-raad","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-social","kji_keyword-arbeidsrecht","kji_keyword-g-grond","kji_keyword-ontbinding","kji_keyword-verzoek","kji_keyword-werkgever","kji_language-nl"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:NL:HR:2022:333 Hoge Raad , 25-02-2022 \/ 21\/00553 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:NL:HR:2022:333 Hoge Raad , 25-02-2022 \/ 21\/00553\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Art. 81 lid 1 RO. Arbeidsrecht. Ontbinding op verzoek werkgever op de g-grond. Afwijzing verzoek werknemer om toekenning billijke vergoeding. Klachten op beide onderdelen.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:NL:HR:2022:333 Hoge Raad , 25-02-2022 \\\/ 21\\\/00553 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T11:25:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:NL:HR:2022:333 Hoge Raad , 25-02-2022 \\\/ 21\\\/00553\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:NL:HR:2022:333 Hoge Raad , 25-02-2022 \/ 21\/00553 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:NL:HR:2022:333 Hoge Raad , 25-02-2022 \/ 21\/00553","og_description":"Art. 81 lid 1 RO. Arbeidsrecht. Ontbinding op verzoek werkgever op de g-grond. Afwijzing verzoek werknemer om toekenning billijke vergoeding. Klachten op beide onderdelen.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"2 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\/","name":"ECLI:NL:HR:2022:333 Hoge Raad , 25-02-2022 \/ 21\/00553 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-24T11:25:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr2022333-hoge-raad-25-02-2022-21-00553-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:NL:HR:2022:333 Hoge Raad , 25-02-2022 \/ 21\/00553"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/672524","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=672524"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=672524"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=672524"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=672524"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=672524"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=672524"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=672524"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=672524"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}