{"id":673387,"date":"2026-04-24T15:43:38","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T13:43:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T15:43:38","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T13:43:38","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 743\/12.6TXLSB-E.S1 \u2013 2022-02-02"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I &#8212; O requerente intentou a presente peti??o de habeas corpus invocando, em suma, que n?o foi respeitado o prazo m?ximo de pris?o preventiva estabelecido no art. 215.?, n.? 1, al. d), do CPP. II &#8212; Sucede que o requerente foi condenado numa pena de pris?o por dias livres, tendo o TEP, por senten?a j? transitada em julgado, considerado injustificadas as faltas cometidas pelo condenado e ordenado que este cumprisse, em regime de pris?o cont?nua, os per?odos remanescentes, pena cujo termo apenas ocorrer? a 21 de abril de 2022. III &#8212; Do exposto conclui-se, assim, que o requerente n?o se encontra em situa??o de pris?o preventiva, motivo pelo qual n?o tem aqui aplica??o o disposto no art. 215.? do CPP, mas antes em cumprimento de pena de pris?o, que foi determinada por entidade competente ? o juiz do processo; ? motivada por facto pelo qual a lei a permite ? decis?o judicial transitada em julgado, logo, exequ?vel; e n?o se mostra excedido o respetivo prazo, pelo que, em face destas circunst?ncias, se indefere a peti??o de habeas corpus apresentada.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/505c23d2c53aff13802587de004c6225?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I &#8212; O requerente intentou a presente peti??o de habeas corpus invocando, em suma, que n?o foi respeitado o prazo m?ximo de pris?o preventiva estabelecido no art. 215.?, n.? 1, al. d), do CPP. II &#8212; Sucede que o requerente foi condenado numa pena de pris?o por dias livres, tendo o TEP, por senten?a j? transitada em julgado, considerado injustificadas as faltas cometidas pelo condenado e ordenado que este cumprisse, em regime de pris?o cont?nua, os per?odos remanescentes, pena cujo termo apenas ocorrer? a 21 de abril de 2022. III &#8212; Do exposto conclui-se, assim, que o requerente n?o se encontra em situa??o de pris?o preventiva, motivo pelo qual n?o tem aqui aplica??o o disposto no art. 215.? do CPP, mas antes em cumprimento de pena de pris?o, que foi determinada por entidade competente ? o juiz do processo; ? motivada por facto pelo qual a lei a permite ? decis?o judicial transitada em julgado, logo, exequ?vel; e n?o se mostra excedido o respetivo prazo, pelo que, em face destas circunst?ncias, se indefere a peti??o de habeas corpus apresentada.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8484],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-673387","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-3-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 743\/12.6TXLSB-E.S1 \u2013 2022-02-02 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 743\/12.6TXLSB-E.S1 \u2013 2022-02-02\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - O requerente intentou a presente peti??o de habeas corpus invocando, em suma, que n?o foi respeitado o prazo m?ximo de pris?o preventiva estabelecido no art. 215.?, n.? 1, al. d), do CPP. II - Sucede que o requerente foi condenado numa pena de pris?o por dias livres, tendo o TEP, por senten?a j? transitada em julgado, considerado injustificadas as faltas cometidas pelo condenado e ordenado que este cumprisse, em regime de pris?o cont?nua, os per?odos remanescentes, pena cujo termo apenas ocorrer? a 21 de abril de 2022. III - Do exposto conclui-se, assim, que o requerente n?o se encontra em situa??o de pris?o preventiva, motivo pelo qual n?o tem aqui aplica??o o disposto no art. 215.? do CPP, mas antes em cumprimento de pena de pris?o, que foi determinada por entidade competente ? o juiz do processo; ? motivada por facto pelo qual a lei a permite ? decis?o judicial transitada em julgado, logo, exequ?vel; e n?o se mostra excedido o respetivo prazo, pelo que, em face destas circunst?ncias, se indefere a peti??o de habeas corpus apresentada.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 743\\\/12.6TXLSB-E.S1 \u2013 2022-02-02 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T13:43:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 743\\\/12.6TXLSB-E.S1 \u2013 2022-02-02\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 743\/12.6TXLSB-E.S1 \u2013 2022-02-02 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 743\/12.6TXLSB-E.S1 \u2013 2022-02-02","og_description":"Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - O requerente intentou a presente peti??o de habeas corpus invocando, em suma, que n?o foi respeitado o prazo m?ximo de pris?o preventiva estabelecido no art. 215.?, n.? 1, al. d), do CPP. II - Sucede que o requerente foi condenado numa pena de pris?o por dias livres, tendo o TEP, por senten?a j? transitada em julgado, considerado injustificadas as faltas cometidas pelo condenado e ordenado que este cumprisse, em regime de pris?o cont?nua, os per?odos remanescentes, pena cujo termo apenas ocorrer? a 21 de abril de 2022. III - Do exposto conclui-se, assim, que o requerente n?o se encontra em situa??o de pris?o preventiva, motivo pelo qual n?o tem aqui aplica??o o disposto no art. 215.? do CPP, mas antes em cumprimento de pena de pris?o, que foi determinada por entidade competente ? o juiz do processo; ? motivada por facto pelo qual a lei a permite ? decis?o judicial transitada em julgado, logo, exequ?vel; e n?o se mostra excedido o respetivo prazo, pelo que, em face destas circunst?ncias, se indefere a peti??o de habeas corpus apresentada.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 743\/12.6TXLSB-E.S1 \u2013 2022-02-02 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-24T13:43:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-743-12-6txlsb-e-s1-2022-02-02\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 743\/12.6TXLSB-E.S1 \u2013 2022-02-02"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/673387","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=673387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=673387"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=673387"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=673387"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=673387"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=673387"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=673387"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=673387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}