{"id":673486,"date":"2026-04-24T15:58:44","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T13:58:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T15:58:44","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T13:58:44","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5063\/13.6TDLSB-J.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: HELENA MONIZ. I — N?o ocorre qualquer irregularidade quando se determina, por for?a do disposto no art. 130.?, do CPC ex vi art. 4.?, do CPP, a n?o realiza??o de um ato in?til. II ? Invocando o recorrente o que alegou no requerimento que interp?s no tribunal da Rela??o de Lisboa n?o s? j? n?o pode ser agora apreciado porque n?o se trata de quest?o colocada no ?mbito do recurso interposto, pelo que n?o h? qualquer omiss?o de pron?ncia, como depois de o recurso ter sido interposto n?o pode ser ampliado o seu ?mbito. III — Competia ao STJ decidir o recurso interposto quanto ? quest?o colocada ? a relativa ? decis?o em que a Senhora Presidente do tribunal da Rela??o de Lisboa se considerou n?o impedida, recurso este interposto ao abrigo do disposto no art. 42.?, n.? 1, 2.? parte, do CPP; n?o est?vamos perante a an?lise de prova documental onde seria aplic?vel o disposto no art. 170.?, do CPP, e por via da exist?ncia de disposi??o pr?pria no processo penal quanto ? falsidade de documentos, o incidente de falsidade de documento previsto no CPC n?o ? aplic?vel ao processo penal, uma vez que n?o existe qualquer lacuna.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: HELENA MONIZ. I — N?o ocorre qualquer irregularidade quando se determina, por for?a do disposto no art. 130.?, do CPC ex vi art. 4.?, do CPP, a n?o realiza??o de um ato in?til. II ? Invocando o recorrente o que alegou no requerimento que interp?s no tribunal da Rela??o de Lisboa n?o s? j? n?o pode ser agora apreciado porque n?o se trata de quest?o colocada no ?mbito do recurso interposto, pelo que n?o h? qualquer omiss?o de pron?ncia, como depois de o recurso ter sido interposto n?o pode ser ampliado o seu ?mbito. III — Competia ao STJ decidir o recurso interposto quanto ? quest?o colocada ? a relativa ? decis?o em que a Senhora Presidente do tribunal da Rela??o de Lisboa se considerou n?o impedida, recurso este interposto ao abrigo do disposto no art. 42.?, n.? 1, 2.? parte, do CPP; n?o est?vamos perante a an?lise de prova documental onde seria aplic?vel o disposto no art. 170.?, do CPP, e por via da exist?ncia de disposi??o pr?pria no processo penal quanto ? falsidade de documentos, o incidente de falsidade de documento previsto no CPC n?o ? aplic?vel ao processo penal, uma vez que n?o existe qualquer lacuna.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7772,7771,7773,36016,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-673486","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tdlsb-j","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5063\/13.6TDLSB-J.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5063\/13.6TDLSB-J.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: HELENA MONIZ. I - N?o ocorre qualquer irregularidade quando se determina, por for?a do disposto no art. 130.?, do CPC ex vi art. 4.?, do CPP, a n?o realiza??o de um ato in?til. II ? Invocando o recorrente o que alegou no requerimento que interp?s no tribunal da Rela??o de Lisboa n?o s? j? n?o pode ser agora apreciado porque n?o se trata de quest?o colocada no ?mbito do recurso interposto, pelo que n?o h? qualquer omiss?o de pron?ncia, como depois de o recurso ter sido interposto n?o pode ser ampliado o seu ?mbito. III - Competia ao STJ decidir o recurso interposto quanto ? quest?o colocada ? a relativa ? decis?o em que a Senhora Presidente do tribunal da Rela??o de Lisboa se considerou n?o impedida, recurso este interposto ao abrigo do disposto no art. 42.?, n.? 1, 2.? parte, do CPP; n?o est?vamos perante a an?lise de prova documental onde seria aplic?vel o disposto no art. 170.?, do CPP, e por via da exist?ncia de disposi??o pr?pria no processo penal quanto ? falsidade de documentos, o incidente de falsidade de documento previsto no CPC n?o ? aplic?vel ao processo penal, uma vez que n?o existe qualquer lacuna.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5063\\\/13.6TDLSB-J.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T13:58:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5063\\\/13.6TDLSB-J.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5063\/13.6TDLSB-J.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5063\/13.6TDLSB-J.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27","og_description":"Relator: HELENA MONIZ. I - N?o ocorre qualquer irregularidade quando se determina, por for?a do disposto no art. 130.?, do CPC ex vi art. 4.?, do CPP, a n?o realiza??o de um ato in?til. II ? Invocando o recorrente o que alegou no requerimento que interp?s no tribunal da Rela??o de Lisboa n?o s? j? n?o pode ser agora apreciado porque n?o se trata de quest?o colocada no ?mbito do recurso interposto, pelo que n?o h? qualquer omiss?o de pron?ncia, como depois de o recurso ter sido interposto n?o pode ser ampliado o seu ?mbito. III - Competia ao STJ decidir o recurso interposto quanto ? quest?o colocada ? a relativa ? decis?o em que a Senhora Presidente do tribunal da Rela??o de Lisboa se considerou n?o impedida, recurso este interposto ao abrigo do disposto no art. 42.?, n.? 1, 2.? parte, do CPP; n?o est?vamos perante a an?lise de prova documental onde seria aplic?vel o disposto no art. 170.?, do CPP, e por via da exist?ncia de disposi??o pr?pria no processo penal quanto ? falsidade de documentos, o incidente de falsidade de documento previsto no CPC n?o ? aplic?vel ao processo penal, uma vez que n?o existe qualquer lacuna.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5063\/13.6TDLSB-J.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-24T13:58:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5063-13-6tdlsb-j-l1-s1-2022-01-27-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5063\/13.6TDLSB-J.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/673486","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=673486"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=673486"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=673486"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=673486"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=673486"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=673486"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=673486"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=673486"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}