{"id":673497,"date":"2026-04-24T15:59:06","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T13:59:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T15:59:06","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T13:59:06","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3777\/17.0T8VFR.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: ROSA TCHING. I. A insufici?ncia na densifica??o ou concretiza??o adequada de algum aspeto ou vertente dos factos essenciais em que o autor estriba a pretens?o deduzida n?o gera o v?cio de ineptid?o da peti??o inicial. II. Relativamente ao autor, permite o artigo 588?, do C?digo de Processo Civil, que a alega??o superveniente de factos constitutivos, se destine a completar a causa de pedir inicial, como implique uma efetiva altera??o ou modifica??o da causa de pedir, sendo a superveni?ncia crit?rio bastante para afastar as restri??es fixadas nos artigos 264? e 265?, do mesmo c?digo. III. N?o tendo a autora alegado na peti??o inicial, como fundamento dos pedidos de indemniza??o das alegadas benfeitorias e de reconhecimento do direito de reten??o sobre o im?vel em causa, formulados ?nos termos dos artigos 1129.?, 1138.?, n? 1 e 1273.?, 754 e 755?, n? 1, al. e), todos do C?digo Civil, factos evidenciadores da ?cessa??o da rela??o jur?dica emergente do invocado contrato de comodato, imp?e-se considerar suprida essa falta? de alega??o pela invoca??o de tais factos em sede de articulado superveniente, ? luz do disposto? ?nos artigos 5?, n? 2, b), 588?, n?s 1 a 3, e 611?, todos do C?digo de Processo Civil.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: ROSA TCHING. I. A insufici?ncia na densifica??o ou concretiza??o adequada de algum aspeto ou vertente dos factos essenciais em que o autor estriba a pretens?o deduzida n?o gera o v?cio de ineptid?o da peti??o inicial. II. Relativamente ao autor, permite o artigo 588?, do C?digo de Processo Civil, que a alega??o superveniente de factos constitutivos, se destine a completar a causa de pedir inicial, como implique uma efetiva altera??o ou modifica??o da causa de pedir, sendo a superveni?ncia crit?rio bastante para afastar as restri??es fixadas nos artigos 264? e 265?, do mesmo c?digo. III. N?o tendo a autora alegado na peti??o inicial, como fundamento dos pedidos de indemniza??o das alegadas benfeitorias e de reconhecimento do direito de reten??o sobre o im?vel em causa, formulados ?nos termos dos artigos 1129.?, 1138.?, n? 1 e 1273.?, 754 e 755?, n? 1, al. e), todos do C?digo Civil, factos evidenciadores da ?cessa??o da rela??o jur?dica emergente do invocado contrato de comodato, imp?e-se considerar suprida essa falta? de alega??o pela invoca??o de tais factos em sede de articulado superveniente, ? luz do disposto? ?nos artigos 5?, n? 2, b), 588?, n?s 1 a 3, e 611?, todos do C?digo de Processo Civil.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8784],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-673497","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-2-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3777\/17.0T8VFR.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3777\/17.0T8VFR.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ROSA TCHING. I. A insufici?ncia na densifica??o ou concretiza??o adequada de algum aspeto ou vertente dos factos essenciais em que o autor estriba a pretens?o deduzida n?o gera o v?cio de ineptid?o da peti??o inicial. II. Relativamente ao autor, permite o artigo 588?, do C?digo de Processo Civil, que a alega??o superveniente de factos constitutivos, se destine a completar a causa de pedir inicial, como implique uma efetiva altera??o ou modifica??o da causa de pedir, sendo a superveni?ncia crit?rio bastante para afastar as restri??es fixadas nos artigos 264? e 265?, do mesmo c?digo. III. N?o tendo a autora alegado na peti??o inicial, como fundamento dos pedidos de indemniza??o das alegadas benfeitorias e de reconhecimento do direito de reten??o sobre o im?vel em causa, formulados ?nos termos dos artigos 1129.?, 1138.?, n? 1 e 1273.?, 754 e 755?, n? 1, al. e), todos do C?digo Civil, factos evidenciadores da ?cessa??o da rela??o jur?dica emergente do invocado contrato de comodato, imp?e-se considerar suprida essa falta? de alega??o pela invoca??o de tais factos em sede de articulado superveniente, ? luz do disposto? ?nos artigos 5?, n? 2, b), 588?, n?s 1 a 3, e 611?, todos do C?digo de Processo Civil.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3777\\\/17.0T8VFR.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T13:59:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3777\\\/17.0T8VFR.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3777\/17.0T8VFR.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3777\/17.0T8VFR.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27","og_description":"Relator: ROSA TCHING. I. A insufici?ncia na densifica??o ou concretiza??o adequada de algum aspeto ou vertente dos factos essenciais em que o autor estriba a pretens?o deduzida n?o gera o v?cio de ineptid?o da peti??o inicial. II. Relativamente ao autor, permite o artigo 588?, do C?digo de Processo Civil, que a alega??o superveniente de factos constitutivos, se destine a completar a causa de pedir inicial, como implique uma efetiva altera??o ou modifica??o da causa de pedir, sendo a superveni?ncia crit?rio bastante para afastar as restri??es fixadas nos artigos 264? e 265?, do mesmo c?digo. III. N?o tendo a autora alegado na peti??o inicial, como fundamento dos pedidos de indemniza??o das alegadas benfeitorias e de reconhecimento do direito de reten??o sobre o im?vel em causa, formulados ?nos termos dos artigos 1129.?, 1138.?, n? 1 e 1273.?, 754 e 755?, n? 1, al. e), todos do C?digo Civil, factos evidenciadores da ?cessa??o da rela??o jur?dica emergente do invocado contrato de comodato, imp?e-se considerar suprida essa falta? de alega??o pela invoca??o de tais factos em sede de articulado superveniente, ? luz do disposto? ?nos artigos 5?, n? 2, b), 588?, n?s 1 a 3, e 611?, todos do C?digo de Processo Civil.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3777\/17.0T8VFR.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-24T13:59:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3777-17-0t8vfr-p1-s1-2022-01-27\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3777\/17.0T8VFR.P1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-27"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/673497","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=673497"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=673497"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=673497"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=673497"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=673497"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=673497"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=673497"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=673497"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}