{"id":674184,"date":"2026-04-24T18:13:29","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T16:13:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T18:13:29","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T16:13:29","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16678\/16.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: ISA?AS P?DUA. I — Do art?. 682? do CPC ressalta, de forma clara, a distin??o fundamental entre quest?o de facto e quest?o de direito, fixando-se nele a regra segundo a qual a compet?ncia do Supremo fica circunscrita ? aplica??o do direito aos factos que as inst?ncias tiverem fixado. II — A n?o fixa??o\/discrimina??o (de forma absoluta) pelas inst?ncias precedentes dos factos materiais (considerados provados\/assentes) em que fizeram assentar as suas decis?es, n?o pode ser suprida, ainda que oficiosamente, pelo STJ, impedindo, desse modo, este tribunal de decidir a quest?o que lhe foi submetida para aprecia??o, ou seja, de aplicar o direito e definir o regime jur?dico aplic?vel ao caso em lit?gio. III — Omiss?o essa que inquina, desde logo, o ac?rd?o recorrido do v?cio de nulidade (previsto no art?. 615?, n?. 1 al. b), do CPC), o que imp?e a remessa dos autos ? 2?. inst?ncia para que proceda ? reforma do mesmo, com a fixa??o dos factos materiais dados como provados\/assentes, com a subsequente elabora??o, ? sua luz, de novo ac?rd?o.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: ISA?AS P?DUA. I — Do art?. 682? do CPC ressalta, de forma clara, a distin??o fundamental entre quest?o de facto e quest?o de direito, fixando-se nele a regra segundo a qual a compet?ncia do Supremo fica circunscrita ? aplica??o do direito aos factos que as inst?ncias tiverem fixado. II — A n?o fixa??o\/discrimina??o (de forma absoluta) pelas inst?ncias precedentes dos factos materiais (considerados provados\/assentes) em que fizeram assentar as suas decis?es, n?o pode ser suprida, ainda que oficiosamente, pelo STJ, impedindo, desse modo, este tribunal de decidir a quest?o que lhe foi submetida para aprecia??o, ou seja, de aplicar o direito e definir o regime jur?dico aplic?vel ao caso em lit?gio. III — Omiss?o essa que inquina, desde logo, o ac?rd?o recorrido do v?cio de nulidade (previsto no art?. 615?, n?. 1 al. b), do CPC), o que imp?e a remessa dos autos ? 2?. inst?ncia para que proceda ? reforma do mesmo, com a fixa??o dos factos materiais dados como provados\/assentes, com a subsequente elabora??o, ? sua luz, de novo ac?rd?o.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-674184","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16678\/16.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16678\/16.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ISA?AS P?DUA. I - Do art?. 682? do CPC ressalta, de forma clara, a distin??o fundamental entre quest?o de facto e quest?o de direito, fixando-se nele a regra segundo a qual a compet?ncia do Supremo fica circunscrita ? aplica??o do direito aos factos que as inst?ncias tiverem fixado. II - A n?o fixa??o\/discrimina??o (de forma absoluta) pelas inst?ncias precedentes dos factos materiais (considerados provados\/assentes) em que fizeram assentar as suas decis?es, n?o pode ser suprida, ainda que oficiosamente, pelo STJ, impedindo, desse modo, este tribunal de decidir a quest?o que lhe foi submetida para aprecia??o, ou seja, de aplicar o direito e definir o regime jur?dico aplic?vel ao caso em lit?gio. III - Omiss?o essa que inquina, desde logo, o ac?rd?o recorrido do v?cio de nulidade (previsto no art?. 615?, n?. 1 al. b), do CPC), o que imp?e a remessa dos autos ? 2?. inst?ncia para que proceda ? reforma do mesmo, com a fixa??o dos factos materiais dados como provados\/assentes, com a subsequente elabora??o, ? sua luz, de novo ac?rd?o.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16678\\\/16.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T16:13:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16678\\\/16.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16678\/16.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16678\/16.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18","og_description":"Relator: ISA?AS P?DUA. I - Do art?. 682? do CPC ressalta, de forma clara, a distin??o fundamental entre quest?o de facto e quest?o de direito, fixando-se nele a regra segundo a qual a compet?ncia do Supremo fica circunscrita ? aplica??o do direito aos factos que as inst?ncias tiverem fixado. II - A n?o fixa??o\/discrimina??o (de forma absoluta) pelas inst?ncias precedentes dos factos materiais (considerados provados\/assentes) em que fizeram assentar as suas decis?es, n?o pode ser suprida, ainda que oficiosamente, pelo STJ, impedindo, desse modo, este tribunal de decidir a quest?o que lhe foi submetida para aprecia??o, ou seja, de aplicar o direito e definir o regime jur?dico aplic?vel ao caso em lit?gio. III - Omiss?o essa que inquina, desde logo, o ac?rd?o recorrido do v?cio de nulidade (previsto no art?. 615?, n?. 1 al. b), do CPC), o que imp?e a remessa dos autos ? 2?. inst?ncia para que proceda ? reforma do mesmo, com a fixa??o dos factos materiais dados como provados\/assentes, com a subsequente elabora??o, ? sua luz, de novo ac?rd?o.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16678\/16.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-24T16:13:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16678-16-0t8lsb-l1-s1-2022-01-18\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16678\/16.0T8LSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/674184","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=674184"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=674184"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=674184"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=674184"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=674184"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=674184"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=674184"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=674184"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}