{"id":674200,"date":"2026-04-24T18:26:43","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T16:26:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T18:26:43","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T16:26:43","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3396\/14.3T8GMR.2.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: FERNANDO SAM?ES. I. O incidente de liquida??o previsto no n.? 2 do art.? 358.? do CPC ? um incidente da inst?ncia declarativa com estreita e indissoci?vel liga??o ? ac??o onde a senten?a foi proferida e se reconheceu a exist?ncia do cr?dito, decretando uma condena??o gen?rica, e destina-se somente ? concretiza??o do objecto dessa condena??o, com respeito pelo caso julgado, n?o sendo permitido ?s partes tomar uma posi??o diferente ou mais favor?vel do que a j? assumida na mesma ac??o. II. Para interpretar o sentido e alcance da senten?a, coberta pelo caso julgado, h? que recorrer ? respectiva fundamenta??o, segundo as regras de interpreta??o dos neg?cios jur?dicos, pois assim decorre do disposto no art.? 295.? do CC. III. Viola a autoridade do caso julgado a decis?o que permite ao requerente do incidente de liquida??o, deduzido ao abrigo do disposto nos art.?s 358.?, n.? 2 e 609.?, n.? 2, ambos do CPC, discutir, novamente, a obriga??o e os seus montantes, contrariamente ao decidido na ac??o, onde se considerou que a condena??o n?o ? gen?rica nem h? uma situa??o de iliquidez.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: FERNANDO SAM?ES. I. O incidente de liquida??o previsto no n.? 2 do art.? 358.? do CPC ? um incidente da inst?ncia declarativa com estreita e indissoci?vel liga??o ? ac??o onde a senten?a foi proferida e se reconheceu a exist?ncia do cr?dito, decretando uma condena??o gen?rica, e destina-se somente ? concretiza??o do objecto dessa condena??o, com respeito pelo caso julgado, n?o sendo permitido ?s partes tomar uma posi??o diferente ou mais favor?vel do que a j? assumida na mesma ac??o. II. Para interpretar o sentido e alcance da senten?a, coberta pelo caso julgado, h? que recorrer ? respectiva fundamenta??o, segundo as regras de interpreta??o dos neg?cios jur?dicos, pois assim decorre do disposto no art.? 295.? do CC. III. Viola a autoridade do caso julgado a decis?o que permite ao requerente do incidente de liquida??o, deduzido ao abrigo do disposto nos art.?s 358.?, n.? 2 e 609.?, n.? 2, ambos do CPC, discutir, novamente, a obriga??o e os seus montantes, contrariamente ao decidido na ac??o, onde se considerou que a condena??o n?o ? gen?rica nem h? uma situa??o de iliquidez.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-674200","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3396\/14.3T8GMR.2.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3396\/14.3T8GMR.2.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: FERNANDO SAM?ES. I. O incidente de liquida??o previsto no n.? 2 do art.? 358.? do CPC ? um incidente da inst?ncia declarativa com estreita e indissoci?vel liga??o ? ac??o onde a senten?a foi proferida e se reconheceu a exist?ncia do cr?dito, decretando uma condena??o gen?rica, e destina-se somente ? concretiza??o do objecto dessa condena??o, com respeito pelo caso julgado, n?o sendo permitido ?s partes tomar uma posi??o diferente ou mais favor?vel do que a j? assumida na mesma ac??o. II. Para interpretar o sentido e alcance da senten?a, coberta pelo caso julgado, h? que recorrer ? respectiva fundamenta??o, segundo as regras de interpreta??o dos neg?cios jur?dicos, pois assim decorre do disposto no art.? 295.? do CC. III. Viola a autoridade do caso julgado a decis?o que permite ao requerente do incidente de liquida??o, deduzido ao abrigo do disposto nos art.?s 358.?, n.? 2 e 609.?, n.? 2, ambos do CPC, discutir, novamente, a obriga??o e os seus montantes, contrariamente ao decidido na ac??o, onde se considerou que a condena??o n?o ? gen?rica nem h? uma situa??o de iliquidez.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3396\\\/14.3T8GMR.2.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T16:26:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3396\\\/14.3T8GMR.2.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3396\/14.3T8GMR.2.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3396\/14.3T8GMR.2.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18","og_description":"Relator: FERNANDO SAM?ES. I. O incidente de liquida??o previsto no n.? 2 do art.? 358.? do CPC ? um incidente da inst?ncia declarativa com estreita e indissoci?vel liga??o ? ac??o onde a senten?a foi proferida e se reconheceu a exist?ncia do cr?dito, decretando uma condena??o gen?rica, e destina-se somente ? concretiza??o do objecto dessa condena??o, com respeito pelo caso julgado, n?o sendo permitido ?s partes tomar uma posi??o diferente ou mais favor?vel do que a j? assumida na mesma ac??o. II. Para interpretar o sentido e alcance da senten?a, coberta pelo caso julgado, h? que recorrer ? respectiva fundamenta??o, segundo as regras de interpreta??o dos neg?cios jur?dicos, pois assim decorre do disposto no art.? 295.? do CC. III. Viola a autoridade do caso julgado a decis?o que permite ao requerente do incidente de liquida??o, deduzido ao abrigo do disposto nos art.?s 358.?, n.? 2 e 609.?, n.? 2, ambos do CPC, discutir, novamente, a obriga??o e os seus montantes, contrariamente ao decidido na ac??o, onde se considerou que a condena??o n?o ? gen?rica nem h? uma situa??o de iliquidez.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3396\/14.3T8GMR.2.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-24T16:26:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3396-14-3t8gmr-2-g1-s1-2022-01-18\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3396\/14.3T8GMR.2.G1.S1 \u2013 2022-01-18"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/674200","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=674200"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=674200"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=674200"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=674200"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=674200"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=674200"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=674200"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=674200"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}