{"id":676115,"date":"2026-04-24T23:19:17","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T21:19:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T23:19:20","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T21:19:20","slug":"cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation, 11 novembre 2021, n\u00b0 2020-00145"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>N\u00b0 134 \/ 2021 p\u00e9nal du 11.11.2021 Not. 1412\/20\/CD Num\u00e9ro CAS -2020-00145 du registre<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, onze novembre deu x mille vingt -et-un,<\/p>\n<p>sur le pourvoi de :<\/p>\n<p>E),<\/p>\n<p>demandeur en cassation,<\/p>\n<p>comparant par Ma\u00eetre Max MULLER, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu,<\/p>\n<p>en pr\u00e9sence du Minist\u00e8re public,<\/p>\n<p>l\u2019arr\u00eat qui suit :<\/p>\n<p>Vu le jugement attaqu\u00e9, rendu le 19 juin 2020 sous le num\u00e9ro 1488\/ 2020 par le tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg, chambre correctionnelle, si\u00e9geant en instance d\u2019appel en mati\u00e8re de police, statuant contradictoirement ; Vu le pourvoi en cassation form\u00e9 par Ma\u00eetre Max MULLER , avocat \u00e0 la Cour, au nom de E), suivant d\u00e9claration du 27 ao\u00fbt 2020 au greffe du tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg ; Vu le m\u00e9moire en cassation d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le 22 septembre 2020 au greffe du tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg ; Sur les conclusions de l\u2019avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Sandra KERSCH . Selon l\u2019article 41 de la loi modifi\u00e9e du 18 f\u00e9vrier 1885 sur les pourvois et la proc\u00e9dure en cassation, le d\u00e9lai pour se pourvoir en cassation est d\u2019un mois. Il court pour les jugements contradictoires \u00e0 partir du prononc\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>2 Le pourvoi en cassation d\u00e9clar\u00e9 le 27 ao\u00fbt 2020 au greffe du tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg contre l e jugement rendu le 19 juin 2020 par ce m\u00eame tribunal a \u00e9t\u00e9 introduit en dehors du d\u00e9lai l\u00e9gal.<\/p>\n<p>Il s\u2019ensuit que le pourvoi est irrecevable.<\/p>\n<p>PAR CES MOTIFS,<\/p>\n<p>la Cour de cassation :<\/p>\n<p>d\u00e9clare le pourvoi irrecevable ;<\/p>\n<p>condamne le demandeur en cassation aux frais de l\u2019instance en cassation, ceux expos\u00e9s par le Minist\u00e8re public \u00e9tant liquid\u00e9s \u00e0 1,25 euro.<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 par la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg en son audience publique du jeudi, onze novembre deux mille vingt-et-un, \u00e0 la Cit\u00e9 Judiciaire, B\u00e2timent CR, Plateau du St. Esprit, compos\u00e9e de :<\/p>\n<p>Roger LINDEN, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Christiane JUNCK, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Agn\u00e8s ZAGO, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Nadine WALCH, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel, Fran\u00e7oise SCHANEN, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel ,<\/p>\n<p>qui ont sign\u00e9 le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat avec le greffier \u00e0 la Cour Daniel SCHROEDER .<\/p>\n<p>La lecture du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite en la susdite audience publique par le pr\u00e9sident Roger LINDEN en pr\u00e9sence du premier avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Marc HARPES et du greffier Daniel SCHROEDER .<\/p>\n<p>Conclusions rectificatives du Parquet g\u00e9n\u00e9ral dans l\u2019affaire de cassation<\/p>\n<p>Minist\u00e8re public c\/ E)<\/p>\n<p>(Affaire num\u00e9ro CAS- 2020-00145 du registre)<\/p>\n<p>Les pr\u00e9sentes conclusions remplacent et annulent les conclusions du 15 juillet 2021 sur le point de la recevabilit\u00e9 du pourvoi en cassation.<\/p>\n<p>Par d\u00e9claration faite le 27 ao\u00fbt 2020 au greffe du Tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg, Ma\u00eetre Max MULLER, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg, forma au nom et pour le compte de E), un recours en cassation contre un jugement rendu de fa\u00e7on contradictoire le 19 juin 2020, sous le num\u00e9ro 1488\/2020, par le Tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de et \u00e0 Luxembourg, septi\u00e8me chambre, si\u00e9geant en instance d\u2019appel en mati\u00e8re de police.<\/p>\n<p>Cette d\u00e9claration de recours a \u00e9t\u00e9 suivie en date du 22 septembre 2020 du d\u00e9p\u00f4t d\u2019un m\u00e9moire en cassation pour le compte de E), sign\u00e9 par Ma\u00eetre Max MULLER pr\u00e9cit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 41 de la loi modifi\u00e9e du 18 f\u00e9vrier 1885 sur les pourvois et la proc\u00e9dure en cassation, le d\u00e9lai pour se pourvoir est d\u2019un mois.<\/p>\n<p>Le jugement attaqu\u00e9, ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 rendu contradictoirement le 19 juin 2020, le pourvoi introduit par voie de d\u00e9claration le 27 ao\u00fbt 2020 est tardif et par cons\u00e9quent \u00e0 d\u00e9clarer irrecevable.<\/p>\n<p>A titre subsidiaire les d\u00e9veloppements quant au fond figurant dans les conclusions du 15 juillet 2021 sont maintenues.<\/p>\n<p>Conclusion :<\/p>\n<p>Le pourvoi est irrecevable.<\/p>\n<p>Pour le Procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral d\u2019Etat, l\u2019avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral<\/p>\n<p>Sandra KERSCH<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/data.public.lu\/fr\/datasets\/cour-de-cassation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/download.data.public.lu\/resources\/cour-de-cassation\/20240806-153635\/20211111-cas-2020-00145-134a-accessible.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>N\u00b0 134 \/ 2021 p\u00e9nal du 11.11.2021 Not. 1412\/20\/CD Num\u00e9ro CAS -2020-00145 du registre La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, onze novembre deu x mille vingt -et-un, sur le pourvoi de : E), demandeur\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[8423],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[36297],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,8576,8425],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-676115","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-de-cassation","kji_year-36297","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-novembre","kji_keyword-penal","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation, 11 novembre 2021, n\u00b0 2020-00145 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation, 11 novembre 2021, n\u00b0 2020-00145\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"N\u00b0 134 \/ 2021 p\u00e9nal du 11.11.2021 Not. 1412\/20\/CD Num\u00e9ro CAS -2020-00145 du registre La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, onze novembre deu x mille vingt -et-un, sur le pourvoi de : E), demandeur\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-24T21:19:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 11 novembre 2021, n\u00b0 2020-00145 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T21:19:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-24T21:19:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 11 novembre 2021, n\u00b0 2020-00145\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation, 11 novembre 2021, n\u00b0 2020-00145 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation, 11 novembre 2021, n\u00b0 2020-00145","og_description":"N\u00b0 134 \/ 2021 p\u00e9nal du 11.11.2021 Not. 1412\/20\/CD Num\u00e9ro CAS -2020-00145 du registre La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, onze novembre deu x mille vingt -et-un, sur le pourvoi de : E), demandeur\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-04-24T21:19:20+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\/","name":"Cour de cassation, 11 novembre 2021, n\u00b0 2020-00145 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-24T21:19:17+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-24T21:19:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-11-novembre-2021-n-2020-00145\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation, 11 novembre 2021, n\u00b0 2020-00145"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/676115","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=676115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=676115"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=676115"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=676115"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=676115"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=676115"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=676115"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=676115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}