{"id":676638,"date":"2026-04-25T00:29:15","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T22:29:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\/"},"modified":"2026-04-25T00:29:15","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T22:29:15","slug":"kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\/","title":{"rendered":"KHO 9.12.2021\/H4411 — Landsv\u00e4g"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

A hade v\u00e4gr\u00e4tt inom en fastighet som \u00e4gdes av B och C. N\u00e4rings-, trafik- och milj\u00f6centralen (NTM-centralen) hade beviljat A tillst\u00e5nd f\u00f6r en anslutning till f\u00f6rbindelsev\u00e4gen f\u00f6r ut\u00f6vande av n\u00e4ringsverksamhet eller s\u00e4rskild anv\u00e4ndning. B och C som inte hade h\u00f6rts av NTM-centralen blev underr\u00e4ttade om tillst\u00e5ndet f\u00f6r anslutningen efter att besv\u00e4rstiden g\u00e5tt ut. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen pr\u00f6vade B:S och C:s yrkanden som inl\u00e4mnats efter att besv\u00e4rstiden hade g\u00e5tt ut som en i f\u00f6rvaltningsprocesslagen (586\/1996) avsedd klagan och avslog den.<\/p>\n

H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen beviljade besv\u00e4rstillst\u00e5nd. H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade att p\u00e5 B:s och C:s besv\u00e4r avg\u00f6ra om NTM-centralen borde ha h\u00f6rt B och C innan den avgjorde ovan n\u00e4mnda tillst\u00e5nds\u00e4rende.<\/p>\n

H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade att det inte i landsv\u00e4gslagen (503\/2005) ing\u00e5r best\u00e4mmelser om vem som \u00e4r part i ett \u00e4rende som g\u00e4ller tillst\u00e5nd f\u00f6r anslutning. P\u00e5 behandlingen av ans\u00f6kan om tillst\u00e5nd f\u00f6r anslutning till\u00e4mpas d\u00e4rf\u00f6r f\u00f6rvaltningslagens best\u00e4mmelser om parter och h\u00f6rande av part.<\/p>\n

Enligt tillst\u00e5ndsans\u00f6kan var anslutningen t\u00e4nkt att g\u00f6ras till servitutsv\u00e4gen p\u00e5 B:s och C:s fastighet och anslutningens avfart, som enligt den anvisning som bifogats tillst\u00e5ndsbeslutet m\u00e5ste bel\u00e4ggas, placerade sig delvis p\u00e5 \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kandenas fastighet. P\u00e5 dessa grunder ans\u00e5g h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen att B och C var parter i \u00e4rendet enligt 11 \u00a7 i f\u00f6rvaltningslagen. NTM-centralen borde d\u00e4rf\u00f6r ha berett B och C tillf\u00e4lle att bli h\u00f6rda innan \u00e4rendet avgjordes.<\/p>\n

Eftersom B och C inte hade h\u00f6rts i \u00e4rendet och eftersom NTM-centralens beslut kr\u00e4nkte deras r\u00e4ttigheter som \u00e4gare av den fastighet som var f\u00f6rem\u00e5l f\u00f6r de i tillst\u00e5ndet angivna \u00e5tg\u00e4rderna, upph\u00e4vde och undanr\u00f6jde h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen NTM-centralens beslut och \u00e5terf\u00f6rvisade \u00e4rendet till NTM-centralen f\u00f6r ny behandling. Samtidigt upph\u00e4vdes f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut att avsl\u00e5 klagan.<\/p>\n

F\u00f6rvaltningslagen 11 \u00a7 och 34 \u00a7<\/h3>\n

Landsv\u00e4gslagen (503\/2005) 105 \u00a7 2 mom. (566\/2016)<\/p>\n

F\u00f6rvaltningsprocesslagen (586\/1996) 58 \u00a7, 59 \u00a7 1 mom. 1 punkten, 60 \u00a7 2 mom. och 67 \u00a7 2 mom.<\/p>\n

Lagen om r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ng i f\u00f6rvaltnings\u00e4renden 87 \u00a7, 107 \u00a7 1 mom., 111 \u00a7 1 mom., 125 \u00a7, 126 \u00a7 2 och 3 mom.<\/p>\n

A:lla oli tieoikeus B:n ja C:n omistaman kiinteist\u00f6n alueella. Elinkeino-, liikenne- ja ymp\u00e4rist\u00f6keskus (ELY-keskus) oli my\u00f6nt\u00e4nyt A:lle luvan tehd\u00e4 tiehen elinkeinon harjoittamiseen tai erityisk\u00e4ytt\u00f6\u00f6n tarkoitetun liittym\u00e4n yhdystielle. B ja C, joita ELY-keskus ei ollut kuullut asiassa, olivat saaneet tiedon liittym\u00e4luvan my\u00f6nt\u00e4misest\u00e4 valitusajan umpeuduttua. Hallinto-oikeus oli tutkinut B:n ja C:n valitusajan j\u00e4lkeen esitt\u00e4m\u00e4t vaatimukset asiassa tehtyn\u00e4 hallintolaink\u00e4ytt\u00f6laissa (586\/1996) tarkoitettuna kanteluna ja hyl\u00e4nnyt kantelun.<\/p>\n

Korkein hallinto-oikeus my\u00f6nsi asiassa valitusluvan. Korkeimmassa hallinto-oikeudessa oli B:n ja C:n valituksesta arvioitavana, oliko ELY-keskuksen tullut kuulla B:t\u00e4 ja C:t\u00e4 ennen edell\u00e4 tarkoitetun lupa-asian ratkaisemista.<\/p>\n

Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi, ettei maantielaissa (503\/2005) ollut s\u00e4\u00e4nn\u00f6ksi\u00e4 siit\u00e4, keit\u00e4 liittym\u00e4lupaa koskevassa asiassa oli pidett\u00e4v\u00e4 asianosaisina. Liittym\u00e4lupahakemuksen k\u00e4sittelyyn sovellettiin siten hallintolain s\u00e4\u00e4nn\u00f6ksi\u00e4 asianosaisista ja heid\u00e4n kuulemisestaan.<\/p>\n

Koska lupahakemuksen mukaan liittym\u00e4 oli tarkoitus tehd\u00e4 B:n ja C:n kiinteist\u00f6ll\u00e4 sijaitsevaan rasitetiehen ja koska liittym\u00e4n odotustila, joka oli lupap\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen liitteen\u00e4 olevan ohjeen mukaisesti p\u00e4\u00e4llystett\u00e4v\u00e4, sijoittui osittain muutoksenhakijoiden kiinteist\u00f6n alueelle, korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, ett\u00e4 B:t\u00e4 ja C:t\u00e4 oli pidett\u00e4v\u00e4 liittym\u00e4lupa-asiassa hallintolain 11 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 tarkoitettuina asianosaisina. ELY-keskuksen olisi t\u00e4m\u00e4n vuoksi tullut varata B:lle ja C:lle tilaisuus tulla kuulluiksi ennen asian ratkaisemista.<\/p>\n

Koska B:t\u00e4 ja C:t\u00e4 ei ollut asiassa kuultu ja koska ELY-keskuksen p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s loukkasi heid\u00e4n oikeuttaan liittym\u00e4luvassa m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ttyjen toimenpiteiden kohteena olevan kiinteist\u00f6n omistajina, korkein hallinto-oikeus kumosi ja poisti ELY-keskuksen p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen ja palautti asian ELY-keskukselle uudelleen k\u00e4sitelt\u00e4v\u00e4ksi. Hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s kantelun hylk\u00e4\u00e4misest\u00e4 kumottiin samalla.<\/p>\n

Hallintolaki 11 \u00a7 ja 34 \u00a7<\/h3>\n

Maantielaki (503\/2005) 105 \u00a7 2 momentti (566\/2016)<\/h3>\n

Hallintolaink\u00e4ytt\u00f6laki (586\/1996) 58 \u00a7, 59 \u00a7 1 momentti 1 kohta, 60 \u00a7 2 momentti ja 67 \u00a7 2 momentti<\/h3>\n

Oikeudenk\u00e4ynnist\u00e4 hallintoasioissa annettu laki 87 \u00a7, 107 \u00a7 1 momentti, 111 \u00a7 1 momentti, 125 \u00a7, 126 \u00a7 2 ja 3 momentti<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A hade v\u00e4gr\u00e4tt inom en fastighet som \u00e4gdes av B och C. N\u00e4rings-, trafik- och milj\u00f6centralen (NTM-centralen) hade beviljat A tillst\u00e5nd f\u00f6r en anslutning till f\u00f6rbindelsev\u00e4gen f\u00f6r ut\u00f6vande av n\u00e4ringsverksamhet eller s\u00e4rskild anv\u00e4ndning. B och C som inte hade h\u00f6rts av NTM-centralen blev underr\u00e4ttade om tillst\u00e5ndet f\u00f6r anslutningen efter att besv\u00e4rstiden g\u00e5tt ut. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen pr\u00f6vade…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[28668],"kji_chamber":[31727],"kji_year":[36297],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[30864,10596,29218],"kji_language":[7746],"class_list":["post-676638","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-administrative-de-finlande","kji_chamber-sommaires","kji_year-36297","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-besvarstiden","kji_keyword-efter","kji_keyword-ntm-centralen","kji_language-multilingue"],"yoast_head":"\nKHO 9.12.2021\/H4411 - Landsv\u00e4g - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KHO 9.12.2021\/H4411 - Landsv\u00e4g\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A hade v\u00e4gr\u00e4tt inom en fastighet som \u00e4gdes av B och C. N\u00e4rings-, trafik- och milj\u00f6centralen (NTM-centralen) hade beviljat A tillst\u00e5nd f\u00f6r en anslutning till f\u00f6rbindelsev\u00e4gen f\u00f6r ut\u00f6vande av n\u00e4ringsverksamhet eller s\u00e4rskild anv\u00e4ndning. B och C som inte hade h\u00f6rts av NTM-centralen blev underr\u00e4ttade om tillst\u00e5ndet f\u00f6r anslutningen efter att besv\u00e4rstiden g\u00e5tt ut. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen pr\u00f6vade...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"KHO 9.12.2021\\\/H4411 - Landsv\u00e4g - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T22:29:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KHO 9.12.2021\\\/H4411 – Landsv\u00e4g\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KHO 9.12.2021\/H4411 - Landsv\u00e4g - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"KHO 9.12.2021\/H4411 - Landsv\u00e4g","og_description":"A hade v\u00e4gr\u00e4tt inom en fastighet som \u00e4gdes av B och C. N\u00e4rings-, trafik- och milj\u00f6centralen (NTM-centralen) hade beviljat A tillst\u00e5nd f\u00f6r en anslutning till f\u00f6rbindelsev\u00e4gen f\u00f6r ut\u00f6vande av n\u00e4ringsverksamhet eller s\u00e4rskild anv\u00e4ndning. B och C som inte hade h\u00f6rts av NTM-centralen blev underr\u00e4ttade om tillst\u00e5ndet f\u00f6r anslutningen efter att besv\u00e4rstiden g\u00e5tt ut. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen pr\u00f6vade...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"4 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\/","name":"KHO 9.12.2021\/H4411 - Landsv\u00e4g - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-24T22:29:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-9-12-2021-h4411-landsvag-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KHO 9.12.2021\/H4411 – Landsv\u00e4g"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/676638","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=676638"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=676638"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=676638"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=676638"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=676638"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=676638"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=676638"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=676638"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}