{"id":677119,"date":"2026-04-25T02:07:51","date_gmt":"2026-04-25T00:07:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\/"},"modified":"2026-04-25T02:07:51","modified_gmt":"2026-04-25T00:07:51","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 40\/20.3TRPRT \u2013 2021-12-02"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: S?NIO ALVES. I — Do art. 399.? do CPP resulta claro que s? ? poss?vel recorrer de decis?es judiciais, isto ?, de decis?es proferidas por um tribunal. As decis?es proferidas por magistrados do MP s?o, naturalmente, sindic?veis; por?m, n?o por via de recurso, antes pelos meios pr?prios de interven??o hier?rquica legalmente previstos. II — Sendo o requerimento de abertura da instru??o totalmente omisso quanto ao elemento subjectivo dos crimes imputados aos denunciados, n?o tem condi??es para prosseguir, sendo certo que ? como decorre do AUJ n.? 7\/2005, de 12-05-2005, DR I, s?rie-A, n.? 212, de 04-11-2005 ? ?N?o h? lugar a convite ao assistente para aperfei?oar o requerimento de abertura de instru??o, apresentado nos termos do artigo 287.?, n.? 2, do CPP, quando for omisso relativamente ? narra??o sint?tica dos factos que fundamentam a aplica??o de uma pena ao arguido?, entendimento j? julgado conforme ? CRP pelo ac?rd?o TC 389\/2005, de 14-07-2005, reafirmado nos ac?rd?os do mesmo tribunal n.? 636\/2011, de 20-12-2011 e 175\/2013, de 20-03-2013.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: S?NIO ALVES. I — Do art. 399.? do CPP resulta claro que s? ? poss?vel recorrer de decis?es judiciais, isto ?, de decis?es proferidas por um tribunal. As decis?es proferidas por magistrados do MP s?o, naturalmente, sindic?veis; por?m, n?o por via de recurso, antes pelos meios pr?prios de interven??o hier?rquica legalmente previstos. II — Sendo o requerimento de abertura da instru??o totalmente omisso quanto ao elemento subjectivo dos crimes imputados aos denunciados, n?o tem condi??es para prosseguir, sendo certo que ? como decorre do AUJ n.? 7\/2005, de 12-05-2005, DR I, s?rie-A, n.? 212, de 04-11-2005 ? ?N?o h? lugar a convite ao assistente para aperfei?oar o requerimento de abertura de instru??o, apresentado nos termos do artigo 287.?, n.? 2, do CPP, quando for omisso relativamente ? narra??o sint?tica dos factos que fundamentam a aplica??o de uma pena ao arguido?, entendimento j? julgado conforme ? CRP pelo ac?rd?o TC 389\/2005, de 14-07-2005, reafirmado nos ac?rd?os do mesmo tribunal n.? 636\/2011, de 20-12-2011 e 175\/2013, de 20-03-2013.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8484],"kji_year":[36297],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-677119","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-3-seco","kji_year-36297","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 40\/20.3TRPRT \u2013 2021-12-02 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 40\/20.3TRPRT \u2013 2021-12-02\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: S?NIO ALVES. I - Do art. 399.? do CPP resulta claro que s? ? poss?vel recorrer de decis?es judiciais, isto ?, de decis?es proferidas por um tribunal. As decis?es proferidas por magistrados do MP s?o, naturalmente, sindic?veis; por?m, n?o por via de recurso, antes pelos meios pr?prios de interven??o hier?rquica legalmente previstos. II - Sendo o requerimento de abertura da instru??o totalmente omisso quanto ao elemento subjectivo dos crimes imputados aos denunciados, n?o tem condi??es para prosseguir, sendo certo que ? como decorre do AUJ n.? 7\/2005, de 12-05-2005, DR I, s?rie-A, n.? 212, de 04-11-2005 ? ?N?o h? lugar a convite ao assistente para aperfei?oar o requerimento de abertura de instru??o, apresentado nos termos do artigo 287.?, n.? 2, do CPP, quando for omisso relativamente ? narra??o sint?tica dos factos que fundamentam a aplica??o de uma pena ao arguido?, entendimento j? julgado conforme ? CRP pelo ac?rd?o TC 389\/2005, de 14-07-2005, reafirmado nos ac?rd?os do mesmo tribunal n.? 636\/2011, de 20-12-2011 e 175\/2013, de 20-03-2013.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 40\\\/20.3TRPRT \u2013 2021-12-02 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-25T00:07:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 40\\\/20.3TRPRT \u2013 2021-12-02\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 40\/20.3TRPRT \u2013 2021-12-02 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 40\/20.3TRPRT \u2013 2021-12-02","og_description":"Relator: S?NIO ALVES. I - Do art. 399.? do CPP resulta claro que s? ? poss?vel recorrer de decis?es judiciais, isto ?, de decis?es proferidas por um tribunal. As decis?es proferidas por magistrados do MP s?o, naturalmente, sindic?veis; por?m, n?o por via de recurso, antes pelos meios pr?prios de interven??o hier?rquica legalmente previstos. II - Sendo o requerimento de abertura da instru??o totalmente omisso quanto ao elemento subjectivo dos crimes imputados aos denunciados, n?o tem condi??es para prosseguir, sendo certo que ? como decorre do AUJ n.? 7\/2005, de 12-05-2005, DR I, s?rie-A, n.? 212, de 04-11-2005 ? ?N?o h? lugar a convite ao assistente para aperfei?oar o requerimento de abertura de instru??o, apresentado nos termos do artigo 287.?, n.? 2, do CPP, quando for omisso relativamente ? narra??o sint?tica dos factos que fundamentam a aplica??o de uma pena ao arguido?, entendimento j? julgado conforme ? CRP pelo ac?rd?o TC 389\/2005, de 14-07-2005, reafirmado nos ac?rd?os do mesmo tribunal n.? 636\/2011, de 20-12-2011 e 175\/2013, de 20-03-2013.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 40\/20.3TRPRT \u2013 2021-12-02 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-25T00:07:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-40-20-3trprt-2021-12-02\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 40\/20.3TRPRT \u2013 2021-12-02"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/677119","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=677119"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=677119"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=677119"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=677119"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=677119"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=677119"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=677119"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=677119"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}