{"id":678558,"date":"2026-04-25T06:44:53","date_gmt":"2026-04-25T04:44:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\/"},"modified":"2026-04-25T06:44:53","modified_gmt":"2026-04-25T04:44:53","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16407\/15.6T9PRT-N.S1 \u2013 2021-10-20"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I — O arguido e o seu defensor foram notificados para a audi?ncia de c?mulo jur?dico, prevista no art. 472.? do CPP, n?o tendo sido requerida a presen?a do arguido na mesma nem tendo havido qualquer oposi??o a que a audi?ncia tivesse lugar na sua aus?ncia. Como tal, n?o foi cometida qualquer nulidade insan?vel, designadamente a prevista no art. 119.?, al. c), do CPP, uma vez que a lei n?o exige a compar?ncia do arguido na referida dilig?ncia. II — O arguido praticou trinta crimes de burla qualificada e um crime de falsas declara??es, situando-se a moldura penal abstrata do c?mulo jur?dico, in casu, entre um m?nimo de 5 anos de pris?o e um m?ximo de 79 anos, reduzida a 25 anos de pris?o, atento o disposto no art. 77.?, n.? 2, do CP. III — ? adequada a pena ?nica de 11 anos e 4 meses de pris?o, considerando o conjunto dos factos, a personalidade do agente e as exig?ncias de preven??o geral e especial.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I — O arguido e o seu defensor foram notificados para a audi?ncia de c?mulo jur?dico, prevista no art. 472.? do CPP, n?o tendo sido requerida a presen?a do arguido na mesma nem tendo havido qualquer oposi??o a que a audi?ncia tivesse lugar na sua aus?ncia. Como tal, n?o foi cometida qualquer nulidade insan?vel, designadamente a prevista no art. 119.?, al. c), do CPP, uma vez que a lei n?o exige a compar?ncia do arguido na referida dilig?ncia. II — O arguido praticou trinta crimes de burla qualificada e um crime de falsas declara??es, situando-se a moldura penal abstrata do c?mulo jur?dico, in casu, entre um m?nimo de 5 anos de pris?o e um m?ximo de 79 anos, reduzida a 25 anos de pris?o, atento o disposto no art. 77.?, n.? 2, do CP. III — ? adequada a pena ?nica de 11 anos e 4 meses de pris?o, considerando o conjunto dos factos, a personalidade do agente e as exig?ncias de preven??o geral e especial.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8484],"kji_year":[36297],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-678558","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-3-seco","kji_year-36297","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16407\/15.6T9PRT-N.S1 \u2013 2021-10-20 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16407\/15.6T9PRT-N.S1 \u2013 2021-10-20\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - O arguido e o seu defensor foram notificados para a audi?ncia de c?mulo jur?dico, prevista no art. 472.? do CPP, n?o tendo sido requerida a presen?a do arguido na mesma nem tendo havido qualquer oposi??o a que a audi?ncia tivesse lugar na sua aus?ncia. Como tal, n?o foi cometida qualquer nulidade insan?vel, designadamente a prevista no art. 119.?, al. c), do CPP, uma vez que a lei n?o exige a compar?ncia do arguido na referida dilig?ncia. II - O arguido praticou trinta crimes de burla qualificada e um crime de falsas declara??es, situando-se a moldura penal abstrata do c?mulo jur?dico, in casu, entre um m?nimo de 5 anos de pris?o e um m?ximo de 79 anos, reduzida a 25 anos de pris?o, atento o disposto no art. 77.?, n.? 2, do CP. III - ? adequada a pena ?nica de 11 anos e 4 meses de pris?o, considerando o conjunto dos factos, a personalidade do agente e as exig?ncias de preven??o geral e especial.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16407\\\/15.6T9PRT-N.S1 \u2013 2021-10-20 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-25T04:44:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16407\\\/15.6T9PRT-N.S1 \u2013 2021-10-20\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16407\/15.6T9PRT-N.S1 \u2013 2021-10-20 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16407\/15.6T9PRT-N.S1 \u2013 2021-10-20","og_description":"Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - O arguido e o seu defensor foram notificados para a audi?ncia de c?mulo jur?dico, prevista no art. 472.? do CPP, n?o tendo sido requerida a presen?a do arguido na mesma nem tendo havido qualquer oposi??o a que a audi?ncia tivesse lugar na sua aus?ncia. Como tal, n?o foi cometida qualquer nulidade insan?vel, designadamente a prevista no art. 119.?, al. c), do CPP, uma vez que a lei n?o exige a compar?ncia do arguido na referida dilig?ncia. II - O arguido praticou trinta crimes de burla qualificada e um crime de falsas declara??es, situando-se a moldura penal abstrata do c?mulo jur?dico, in casu, entre um m?nimo de 5 anos de pris?o e um m?ximo de 79 anos, reduzida a 25 anos de pris?o, atento o disposto no art. 77.?, n.? 2, do CP. III - ? adequada a pena ?nica de 11 anos e 4 meses de pris?o, considerando o conjunto dos factos, a personalidade do agente e as exig?ncias de preven??o geral e especial.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16407\/15.6T9PRT-N.S1 \u2013 2021-10-20 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-25T04:44:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-16407-15-6t9prt-n-s1-2021-10-20\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 16407\/15.6T9PRT-N.S1 \u2013 2021-10-20"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/678558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=678558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=678558"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=678558"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=678558"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=678558"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=678558"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=678558"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=678558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}