{"id":680412,"date":"2026-04-25T12:25:41","date_gmt":"2026-04-25T10:25:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\/"},"modified":"2026-04-25T12:25:41","modified_gmt":"2026-04-25T10:25:41","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 768\/15.0T8MCN.P2.S1 \u2013 2021-09-14"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: NUNO PINTO OLIVEIRA. I. ? O art. 943.?, n.? 2, do C?digo de Processo Civil remete para o prudente arb?trio do julgador. II. ? Entre as condi??es para um arb?trio prudente est? o de que o julgador disponha de um adequado conhecimento das circunst?ncias do caso ? e, para que o julgador disponha de um adequado conhecimento das circunst?ncias do caso, poder? colher as informa??es que considere convenientes, poder? fazer as averigua??es que entenda oportunas e ?teis e\/ou poder? incumbir pessoa id?nea ?de dar parecer sobre todas ou parte das verbas inscritas pelo autor?. III.? A alega??o de que o ac?rd?o recorrido devia ou n?o ter dado como provadas despesas no valor global de ? 42.527,01, relativas a bens comuns do casal suscita uma quest?o de facto.? IV.? Face ao art. 674.?, n.? 3, do C?digo de Processo Civil, o Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a n?o pode pronunciar-se sobre se, em face de elementos que considerou seguros e suficientes para julgar as contas, o Tribunal da Rela??o apreciou correctamente as provas relativas ?s despesas e ?s receitas inscritas.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: NUNO PINTO OLIVEIRA. I. ? O art. 943.?, n.? 2, do C?digo de Processo Civil remete para o prudente arb?trio do julgador. II. ? Entre as condi??es para um arb?trio prudente est? o de que o julgador disponha de um adequado conhecimento das circunst?ncias do caso ? e, para que o julgador disponha de um adequado conhecimento das circunst?ncias do caso, poder? colher as informa??es que considere convenientes, poder? fazer as averigua??es que entenda oportunas e ?teis e\/ou poder? incumbir pessoa id?nea ?de dar parecer sobre todas ou parte das verbas inscritas pelo autor?. III.? A alega??o de que o ac?rd?o recorrido devia ou n?o ter dado como provadas despesas no valor global de ? 42.527,01, relativas a bens comuns do casal suscita uma quest?o de facto.? IV.? Face ao art. 674.?, n.? 3, do C?digo de Processo Civil, o Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a n?o pode pronunciar-se sobre se, em face de elementos que considerou seguros e suficientes para julgar as contas, o Tribunal da Rela??o apreciou correctamente as provas relativas ?s despesas e ?s receitas inscritas.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8713],"kji_year":[36297],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-680412","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-7-seco","kji_year-36297","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 768\/15.0T8MCN.P2.S1 \u2013 2021-09-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 768\/15.0T8MCN.P2.S1 \u2013 2021-09-14\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: NUNO PINTO OLIVEIRA. I. ? O art. 943.?, n.? 2, do C?digo de Processo Civil remete para o prudente arb?trio do julgador. II. ? Entre as condi??es para um arb?trio prudente est? o de que o julgador disponha de um adequado conhecimento das circunst?ncias do caso ? e, para que o julgador disponha de um adequado conhecimento das circunst?ncias do caso, poder? colher as informa??es que considere convenientes, poder? fazer as averigua??es que entenda oportunas e ?teis e\/ou poder? incumbir pessoa id?nea ?de dar parecer sobre todas ou parte das verbas inscritas pelo autor?. III.? A alega??o de que o ac?rd?o recorrido devia ou n?o ter dado como provadas despesas no valor global de ? 42.527,01, relativas a bens comuns do casal suscita uma quest?o de facto.? IV.? Face ao art. 674.?, n.? 3, do C?digo de Processo Civil, o Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a n?o pode pronunciar-se sobre se, em face de elementos que considerou seguros e suficientes para julgar as contas, o Tribunal da Rela??o apreciou correctamente as provas relativas ?s despesas e ?s receitas inscritas.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 768\\\/15.0T8MCN.P2.S1 \u2013 2021-09-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-25T10:25:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 768\\\/15.0T8MCN.P2.S1 \u2013 2021-09-14\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 768\/15.0T8MCN.P2.S1 \u2013 2021-09-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 768\/15.0T8MCN.P2.S1 \u2013 2021-09-14","og_description":"Relator: NUNO PINTO OLIVEIRA. I. ? O art. 943.?, n.? 2, do C?digo de Processo Civil remete para o prudente arb?trio do julgador. II. ? Entre as condi??es para um arb?trio prudente est? o de que o julgador disponha de um adequado conhecimento das circunst?ncias do caso ? e, para que o julgador disponha de um adequado conhecimento das circunst?ncias do caso, poder? colher as informa??es que considere convenientes, poder? fazer as averigua??es que entenda oportunas e ?teis e\/ou poder? incumbir pessoa id?nea ?de dar parecer sobre todas ou parte das verbas inscritas pelo autor?. III.? A alega??o de que o ac?rd?o recorrido devia ou n?o ter dado como provadas despesas no valor global de ? 42.527,01, relativas a bens comuns do casal suscita uma quest?o de facto.? IV.? Face ao art. 674.?, n.? 3, do C?digo de Processo Civil, o Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a n?o pode pronunciar-se sobre se, em face de elementos que considerou seguros e suficientes para julgar as contas, o Tribunal da Rela??o apreciou correctamente as provas relativas ?s despesas e ?s receitas inscritas.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 768\/15.0T8MCN.P2.S1 \u2013 2021-09-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-25T10:25:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-768-15-0t8mcn-p2-s1-2021-09-14\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 768\/15.0T8MCN.P2.S1 \u2013 2021-09-14"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/680412","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=680412"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=680412"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=680412"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=680412"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=680412"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=680412"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=680412"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=680412"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}