{"id":689330,"date":"2026-04-26T04:02:55","date_gmt":"2026-04-26T02:02:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\/"},"modified":"2026-04-26T04:02:55","modified_gmt":"2026-04-26T02:02:55","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3690\/19.7T8VNG.P1.S1 \u2013 2021-06-17"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: OLINDO GERALDES. I. A repondera??o da mat?ria de facto pela Rela??o, que poder? dar origem a uma convic??o pr?pria e aut?noma, deve ser concretizada, no ?mbito do dever de fundamenta??o da decis?o, de modo a poder ser conhecida e compreendida, designadamente pelas partes. II. A decis?o da Rela??o, que procede a uma extensa e pormenorizada an?lise cr?tica dos meios de prova, designadamente da prova testemunhal, consubstancia, de forma evidente, a reaprecia??o da prova realizada na apela??o, por efeito da impugna??o da decis?o relativa ? mat?ria de facto. III. Deste modo, nessa decis?o, n?o se surpreende qualquer viola??o dos poderes da Rela??o, previstos no art. 662.?, n.? 1, do C?digo de Processo Civil. IV. O comportamento da parte censur?vel, por dolo ou neglig?ncia grave, que consubstancie um entorpecimento da a??o da justi?a ou um protelamento, sem fundamento s?rio, do tr?nsito em julgado da decis?o, constitui um caso t?pico de litig?ncia de m?-f?, previsto no art. 542.?, n.? 2, al?nea d), do C?digo de Processo Civil. V. N?o h? litig?ncia de m?-f?, nesses termos, quando a revista excecional n?o foi admitida e a revista admitida e negada seja insuficiente para expressar um ju?zo seguro sobre a m?-f?.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: OLINDO GERALDES. I. A repondera??o da mat?ria de facto pela Rela??o, que poder? dar origem a uma convic??o pr?pria e aut?noma, deve ser concretizada, no ?mbito do dever de fundamenta??o da decis?o, de modo a poder ser conhecida e compreendida, designadamente pelas partes. II. A decis?o da Rela??o, que procede a uma extensa e pormenorizada an?lise cr?tica dos meios de prova, designadamente da prova testemunhal, consubstancia, de forma evidente, a reaprecia??o da prova realizada na apela??o, por efeito da impugna??o da decis?o relativa ? mat?ria de facto. III. Deste modo, nessa decis?o, n?o se surpreende qualquer viola??o dos poderes da Rela??o, previstos no art. 662.?, n.? 1, do C?digo de Processo Civil. IV. O comportamento da parte censur?vel, por dolo ou neglig?ncia grave, que consubstancie um entorpecimento da a??o da justi?a ou um protelamento, sem fundamento s?rio, do tr?nsito em julgado da decis?o, constitui um caso t?pico de litig?ncia de m?-f?, previsto no art. 542.?, n.? 2, al?nea d), do C?digo de Processo Civil. V. N?o h? litig?ncia de m?-f?, nesses termos, quando a revista excecional n?o foi admitida e a revista admitida e negada seja insuficiente para expressar um ju?zo seguro sobre a m?-f?.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8713],"kji_year":[36297],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-689330","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-7-seco","kji_year-36297","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3690\/19.7T8VNG.P1.S1 \u2013 2021-06-17 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3690\/19.7T8VNG.P1.S1 \u2013 2021-06-17\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: OLINDO GERALDES. I. A repondera??o da mat?ria de facto pela Rela??o, que poder? dar origem a uma convic??o pr?pria e aut?noma, deve ser concretizada, no ?mbito do dever de fundamenta??o da decis?o, de modo a poder ser conhecida e compreendida, designadamente pelas partes. II. A decis?o da Rela??o, que procede a uma extensa e pormenorizada an?lise cr?tica dos meios de prova, designadamente da prova testemunhal, consubstancia, de forma evidente, a reaprecia??o da prova realizada na apela??o, por efeito da impugna??o da decis?o relativa ? mat?ria de facto. III. Deste modo, nessa decis?o, n?o se surpreende qualquer viola??o dos poderes da Rela??o, previstos no art. 662.?, n.? 1, do C?digo de Processo Civil. IV. O comportamento da parte censur?vel, por dolo ou neglig?ncia grave, que consubstancie um entorpecimento da a??o da justi?a ou um protelamento, sem fundamento s?rio, do tr?nsito em julgado da decis?o, constitui um caso t?pico de litig?ncia de m?-f?, previsto no art. 542.?, n.? 2, al?nea d), do C?digo de Processo Civil. V. N?o h? litig?ncia de m?-f?, nesses termos, quando a revista excecional n?o foi admitida e a revista admitida e negada seja insuficiente para expressar um ju?zo seguro sobre a m?-f?.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3690\\\/19.7T8VNG.P1.S1 \u2013 2021-06-17 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-26T02:02:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3690\\\/19.7T8VNG.P1.S1 \u2013 2021-06-17\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3690\/19.7T8VNG.P1.S1 \u2013 2021-06-17 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3690\/19.7T8VNG.P1.S1 \u2013 2021-06-17","og_description":"Relator: OLINDO GERALDES. I. A repondera??o da mat?ria de facto pela Rela??o, que poder? dar origem a uma convic??o pr?pria e aut?noma, deve ser concretizada, no ?mbito do dever de fundamenta??o da decis?o, de modo a poder ser conhecida e compreendida, designadamente pelas partes. II. A decis?o da Rela??o, que procede a uma extensa e pormenorizada an?lise cr?tica dos meios de prova, designadamente da prova testemunhal, consubstancia, de forma evidente, a reaprecia??o da prova realizada na apela??o, por efeito da impugna??o da decis?o relativa ? mat?ria de facto. III. Deste modo, nessa decis?o, n?o se surpreende qualquer viola??o dos poderes da Rela??o, previstos no art. 662.?, n.? 1, do C?digo de Processo Civil. IV. O comportamento da parte censur?vel, por dolo ou neglig?ncia grave, que consubstancie um entorpecimento da a??o da justi?a ou um protelamento, sem fundamento s?rio, do tr?nsito em julgado da decis?o, constitui um caso t?pico de litig?ncia de m?-f?, previsto no art. 542.?, n.? 2, al?nea d), do C?digo de Processo Civil. V. N?o h? litig?ncia de m?-f?, nesses termos, quando a revista excecional n?o foi admitida e a revista admitida e negada seja insuficiente para expressar um ju?zo seguro sobre a m?-f?.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3690\/19.7T8VNG.P1.S1 \u2013 2021-06-17 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-26T02:02:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3690-19-7t8vng-p1-s1-2021-06-17\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3690\/19.7T8VNG.P1.S1 \u2013 2021-06-17"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/689330","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=689330"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=689330"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=689330"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=689330"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=689330"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=689330"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=689330"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=689330"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}