{"id":697533,"date":"2026-04-26T20:56:52","date_gmt":"2026-04-26T18:56:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\/"},"modified":"2026-04-26T20:56:52","modified_gmt":"2026-04-26T18:56:52","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3300\/15.1T8ENT-A.E1.S2 \u2013 2021-04-06"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: FERNANDO SAM?ES. I. A nulidade por excesso de pron?ncia radica no conhecimento de quest?es que n?o podiam ser julgadas por n?o terem sido suscitadas pelas partes, nem serem de conhecimento oficioso, pelo que n?o padece desse v?cio o ac?rd?o que conhece do objecto da apela??o na sequ?ncia da anula??o total de ac?rd?o anterior para suprimento de outra nulidade nele cometida. II. N?o padece de nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia o ac?rd?o que conhece do objecto da apela??o e ? fundada em argumentos aduzidos pelos recorrentes. III. O regime das nulidades destina-se apenas a remover aspectos de ordem formal que inquinem a decis?o, n?o sendo adequado para manifestar discord?ncia e pugnar pela altera??o do decidido. IV. Ao Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a ? leg?timo sindicar a decis?o da mat?ria de facto nas circunst?ncias referidas no art.? 674.?, n.? 3, e apreciar criticamente a sufici?ncia ou insufici?ncia da mat?ria de facto provada e n?o provada em conex?o com a mat?ria de direito aplic?vel, nos termos do art.? 682.?, n.? 3, do CPC. V. A necessidade de amplia??o da mat?ria de facto determina a anula??o do ac?rd?o pelo STJ e a remessa ? Rela??o para novo julgamento, nos termos dos art.?s 682.?, n.? 3 e 683.?, ambos do CPC.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: FERNANDO SAM?ES. I. A nulidade por excesso de pron?ncia radica no conhecimento de quest?es que n?o podiam ser julgadas por n?o terem sido suscitadas pelas partes, nem serem de conhecimento oficioso, pelo que n?o padece desse v?cio o ac?rd?o que conhece do objecto da apela??o na sequ?ncia da anula??o total de ac?rd?o anterior para suprimento de outra nulidade nele cometida. II. N?o padece de nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia o ac?rd?o que conhece do objecto da apela??o e ? fundada em argumentos aduzidos pelos recorrentes. III. O regime das nulidades destina-se apenas a remover aspectos de ordem formal que inquinem a decis?o, n?o sendo adequado para manifestar discord?ncia e pugnar pela altera??o do decidido. IV. Ao Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a ? leg?timo sindicar a decis?o da mat?ria de facto nas circunst?ncias referidas no art.? 674.?, n.? 3, e apreciar criticamente a sufici?ncia ou insufici?ncia da mat?ria de facto provada e n?o provada em conex?o com a mat?ria de direito aplic?vel, nos termos do art.? 682.?, n.? 3, do CPC. V. A necessidade de amplia??o da mat?ria de facto determina a anula??o do ac?rd?o pelo STJ e a remessa ? Rela??o para novo julgamento, nos termos dos art.?s 682.?, n.? 3 e 683.?, ambos do CPC.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[36297],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-697533","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-36297","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3300\/15.1T8ENT-A.E1.S2 \u2013 2021-04-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3300\/15.1T8ENT-A.E1.S2 \u2013 2021-04-06\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: FERNANDO SAM?ES. I. A nulidade por excesso de pron?ncia radica no conhecimento de quest?es que n?o podiam ser julgadas por n?o terem sido suscitadas pelas partes, nem serem de conhecimento oficioso, pelo que n?o padece desse v?cio o ac?rd?o que conhece do objecto da apela??o na sequ?ncia da anula??o total de ac?rd?o anterior para suprimento de outra nulidade nele cometida. II. N?o padece de nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia o ac?rd?o que conhece do objecto da apela??o e ? fundada em argumentos aduzidos pelos recorrentes. III. O regime das nulidades destina-se apenas a remover aspectos de ordem formal que inquinem a decis?o, n?o sendo adequado para manifestar discord?ncia e pugnar pela altera??o do decidido. IV. Ao Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a ? leg?timo sindicar a decis?o da mat?ria de facto nas circunst?ncias referidas no art.? 674.?, n.? 3, e apreciar criticamente a sufici?ncia ou insufici?ncia da mat?ria de facto provada e n?o provada em conex?o com a mat?ria de direito aplic?vel, nos termos do art.? 682.?, n.? 3, do CPC. V. A necessidade de amplia??o da mat?ria de facto determina a anula??o do ac?rd?o pelo STJ e a remessa ? Rela??o para novo julgamento, nos termos dos art.?s 682.?, n.? 3 e 683.?, ambos do CPC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3300\\\/15.1T8ENT-A.E1.S2 \u2013 2021-04-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-26T18:56:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3300\\\/15.1T8ENT-A.E1.S2 \u2013 2021-04-06\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3300\/15.1T8ENT-A.E1.S2 \u2013 2021-04-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3300\/15.1T8ENT-A.E1.S2 \u2013 2021-04-06","og_description":"Relator: FERNANDO SAM?ES. I. A nulidade por excesso de pron?ncia radica no conhecimento de quest?es que n?o podiam ser julgadas por n?o terem sido suscitadas pelas partes, nem serem de conhecimento oficioso, pelo que n?o padece desse v?cio o ac?rd?o que conhece do objecto da apela??o na sequ?ncia da anula??o total de ac?rd?o anterior para suprimento de outra nulidade nele cometida. II. N?o padece de nulidade por omiss?o de pron?ncia o ac?rd?o que conhece do objecto da apela??o e ? fundada em argumentos aduzidos pelos recorrentes. III. O regime das nulidades destina-se apenas a remover aspectos de ordem formal que inquinem a decis?o, n?o sendo adequado para manifestar discord?ncia e pugnar pela altera??o do decidido. IV. Ao Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a ? leg?timo sindicar a decis?o da mat?ria de facto nas circunst?ncias referidas no art.? 674.?, n.? 3, e apreciar criticamente a sufici?ncia ou insufici?ncia da mat?ria de facto provada e n?o provada em conex?o com a mat?ria de direito aplic?vel, nos termos do art.? 682.?, n.? 3, do CPC. V. A necessidade de amplia??o da mat?ria de facto determina a anula??o do ac?rd?o pelo STJ e a remessa ? Rela??o para novo julgamento, nos termos dos art.?s 682.?, n.? 3 e 683.?, ambos do CPC.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3300\/15.1T8ENT-A.E1.S2 \u2013 2021-04-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-26T18:56:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3300-15-1t8ent-a-e1-s2-2021-04-06\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3300\/15.1T8ENT-A.E1.S2 \u2013 2021-04-06"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/697533","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=697533"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=697533"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=697533"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=697533"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=697533"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=697533"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=697533"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=697533"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}