{"id":707455,"date":"2026-04-27T18:57:27","date_gmt":"2026-04-27T16:57:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\/"},"modified":"2026-04-27T18:57:27","modified_gmt":"2026-04-27T16:57:27","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 528\/19.9PCSTB.E1.S1 \u2013 2021-02-10"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: NUNO GON?ALVES. I &#8212; N?o admite recurso ac?rd?o da Rela??o que, em recurso, conheceu de impugna??o de decis?o interlocut?ria ou incidental que n?o conhece, a final, do objeto do processo. II &#8212; O fundamento da leg?tima defesa radica no reconhecimento da necessidade de autoprote??o, sem perder de vista o princ?pio dos interesses preponderantes. III &#8212; Exige que o agente atue com fim defensivo, com a vontade de repelir uma agress?o injusta e atual. IV &#8212; S? ? atual a agress?o que j? se iniciou, mesmo que na forma tentada, e ainda persiste. V &#8212; Somente quando o agente tenha agido em leg?tima defesa pode questionar-se o seu excesso. VI &#8212; Os motivos que privilegiam o homic?dio, apreciados segundo o senso comum, t?m se ser a causa imediata de sua pr?tica. VII &#8212; A atenua??o especial da moldura penal est? reservada para os ?casos extraordin?rios ou excecionais?. Para os casos ?normais?, a pena determina-se dentro da moldura penal do tipo de il?cito cometido. VIII &#8212; O crit?rio nuclear da individualiza??o da pena adv?m das finalidades de puni??o, atuando no seu ?mbito as circunst?ncias atinentes ao facto, ao agente e ? v?tima. IX &#8212; As exig?ncias de prote??o da vida humana, o bem jur?dico primordial s?o as mais prementes.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/97746e182ad059f6802586b50055a8cf?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: NUNO GON?ALVES. I &#8212; N?o admite recurso ac?rd?o da Rela??o que, em recurso, conheceu de impugna??o de decis?o interlocut?ria ou incidental que n?o conhece, a final, do objeto do processo. II &#8212; O fundamento da leg?tima defesa radica no reconhecimento da necessidade de autoprote??o, sem perder de vista o princ?pio dos interesses preponderantes. III &#8212; Exige que o agente atue com fim defensivo, com a vontade de repelir uma agress?o injusta e atual. IV &#8212; S? ? atual a agress?o que j? se iniciou, mesmo que na forma tentada, e ainda persiste. V &#8212; Somente quando o agente tenha agido em leg?tima defesa pode questionar-se o seu excesso. VI &#8212; Os motivos que privilegiam o homic?dio, apreciados segundo o senso comum, t?m se ser a causa imediata de sua pr?tica. VII &#8212; A atenua??o especial da moldura penal est? reservada para os ?casos extraordin?rios ou excecionais?. Para os casos ?normais?, a pena determina-se dentro da moldura penal do tipo de il?cito cometido. VIII &#8212; O crit?rio nuclear da individualiza??o da pena adv?m das finalidades de puni??o, atuando no seu ?mbito as circunst?ncias atinentes ao facto, ao agente e ? v?tima. IX &#8212; As exig?ncias de prote??o da vida humana, o bem jur?dico primordial s?o as mais prementes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8484],"kji_year":[36297],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-707455","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-3-seco","kji_year-36297","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 528\/19.9PCSTB.E1.S1 \u2013 2021-02-10 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 528\/19.9PCSTB.E1.S1 \u2013 2021-02-10\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: NUNO GON?ALVES. I - N?o admite recurso ac?rd?o da Rela??o que, em recurso, conheceu de impugna??o de decis?o interlocut?ria ou incidental que n?o conhece, a final, do objeto do processo. II - O fundamento da leg?tima defesa radica no reconhecimento da necessidade de autoprote??o, sem perder de vista o princ?pio dos interesses preponderantes. III - Exige que o agente atue com fim defensivo, com a vontade de repelir uma agress?o injusta e atual. IV - S? ? atual a agress?o que j? se iniciou, mesmo que na forma tentada, e ainda persiste. V - Somente quando o agente tenha agido em leg?tima defesa pode questionar-se o seu excesso. VI - Os motivos que privilegiam o homic?dio, apreciados segundo o senso comum, t?m se ser a causa imediata de sua pr?tica. VII - A atenua??o especial da moldura penal est? reservada para os ?casos extraordin?rios ou excecionais?. Para os casos ?normais?, a pena determina-se dentro da moldura penal do tipo de il?cito cometido. VIII - O crit?rio nuclear da individualiza??o da pena adv?m das finalidades de puni??o, atuando no seu ?mbito as circunst?ncias atinentes ao facto, ao agente e ? v?tima. IX - As exig?ncias de prote??o da vida humana, o bem jur?dico primordial s?o as mais prementes.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 528\\\/19.9PCSTB.E1.S1 \u2013 2021-02-10 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-27T16:57:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 528\\\/19.9PCSTB.E1.S1 \u2013 2021-02-10\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 528\/19.9PCSTB.E1.S1 \u2013 2021-02-10 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 528\/19.9PCSTB.E1.S1 \u2013 2021-02-10","og_description":"Relator: NUNO GON?ALVES. I - N?o admite recurso ac?rd?o da Rela??o que, em recurso, conheceu de impugna??o de decis?o interlocut?ria ou incidental que n?o conhece, a final, do objeto do processo. II - O fundamento da leg?tima defesa radica no reconhecimento da necessidade de autoprote??o, sem perder de vista o princ?pio dos interesses preponderantes. III - Exige que o agente atue com fim defensivo, com a vontade de repelir uma agress?o injusta e atual. IV - S? ? atual a agress?o que j? se iniciou, mesmo que na forma tentada, e ainda persiste. V - Somente quando o agente tenha agido em leg?tima defesa pode questionar-se o seu excesso. VI - Os motivos que privilegiam o homic?dio, apreciados segundo o senso comum, t?m se ser a causa imediata de sua pr?tica. VII - A atenua??o especial da moldura penal est? reservada para os ?casos extraordin?rios ou excecionais?. Para os casos ?normais?, a pena determina-se dentro da moldura penal do tipo de il?cito cometido. VIII - O crit?rio nuclear da individualiza??o da pena adv?m das finalidades de puni??o, atuando no seu ?mbito as circunst?ncias atinentes ao facto, ao agente e ? v?tima. IX - As exig?ncias de prote??o da vida humana, o bem jur?dico primordial s?o as mais prementes.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 528\/19.9PCSTB.E1.S1 \u2013 2021-02-10 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-27T16:57:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-528-19-9pcstb-e1-s1-2021-02-10\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 528\/19.9PCSTB.E1.S1 \u2013 2021-02-10"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/707455","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=707455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=707455"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=707455"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=707455"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=707455"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=707455"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=707455"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=707455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}