{"id":715089,"date":"2026-04-28T00:48:01","date_gmt":"2026-04-27T22:48:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\/"},"modified":"2026-05-13T23:56:42","modified_gmt":"2026-05-13T21:56:42","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 231\/18.7PBGMR.S1 \u2013 2021-01-14"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: HELENA MONIZ. I &#8212; Nas situa\u00e7\u00f5es em que o Tribunal procede \u00e0 realiza\u00e7\u00e3o do c\u00famulo jur\u00eddico de penas sem previamente apurar da situa\u00e7\u00e3o concreta da pena suspensa cujo per\u00edodo de suspens\u00e3o se mostre j\u00e1 decorrido, \u00e9 uniforme o entendimento do STJ de que, em semelhante caso, o tribunal incorre em nulidade. II &#8212; Uma vez que nada \u00e9 referido quanto \u00e0 extin\u00e7\u00e3o da pena suspensa na sua execu\u00e7\u00e3o no ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o recorrido, nem resulta dos autos, n\u00e3o se sabendo se j\u00e1 foi (ou n\u00e3o) declarada extinta (caso em que n\u00e3o deveria ser integrada no c\u00famulo jur\u00eddico), e seguindo jurisprud\u00eancia constante deste STJ, o ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o recorrido \u00e9 nulo, nos termos do art. 379.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, al. c), do CPP.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/8543d720bec5aba48025865d003ff25f?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: HELENA MONIZ. I &#8212; Nas situa\u00e7\u00f5es em que o Tribunal procede \u00e0 realiza\u00e7\u00e3o do c\u00famulo jur\u00eddico de penas sem previamente apurar da situa\u00e7\u00e3o concreta da pena suspensa cujo per\u00edodo de suspens\u00e3o se mostre j\u00e1 decorrido, \u00e9 uniforme o entendimento do STJ de que, em semelhante caso, o tribunal incorre em nulidade. II &#8212; Uma vez que nada \u00e9 referido quanto \u00e0 extin\u00e7\u00e3o da pena suspensa na sua execu\u00e7\u00e3o no ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o recorrido, nem resulta dos autos, n\u00e3o se sabendo se j\u00e1 foi (ou n\u00e3o) declarada extinta (caso em que n\u00e3o deveria ser integrada no c\u00famulo jur\u00eddico), e seguindo jurisprud\u00eancia constante deste STJ, o ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o recorrido \u00e9 nulo, nos termos do art. 379.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, al. c), do CPP.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[36297],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,41324,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-715089","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-36297","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-pbgmr","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.6 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 231\/18.7PBGMR.S1 \u2013 2021-01-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 231\/18.7PBGMR.S1 \u2013 2021-01-14\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: HELENA MONIZ. I - Nas situa\u00e7\u00f5es em que o Tribunal procede \u00e0 realiza\u00e7\u00e3o do c\u00famulo jur\u00eddico de penas sem previamente apurar da situa\u00e7\u00e3o concreta da pena suspensa cujo per\u00edodo de suspens\u00e3o se mostre j\u00e1 decorrido, \u00e9 uniforme o entendimento do STJ de que, em semelhante caso, o tribunal incorre em nulidade. II - Uma vez que nada \u00e9 referido quanto \u00e0 extin\u00e7\u00e3o da pena suspensa na sua execu\u00e7\u00e3o no ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o recorrido, nem resulta dos autos, n\u00e3o se sabendo se j\u00e1 foi (ou n\u00e3o) declarada extinta (caso em que n\u00e3o deveria ser integrada no c\u00famulo jur\u00eddico), e seguindo jurisprud\u00eancia constante deste STJ, o ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o recorrido \u00e9 nulo, nos termos do art. 379.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, al. c), do CPP.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-13T21:56:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 231\\\/18.7PBGMR.S1 \u2013 2021-01-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-27T22:48:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-13T21:56:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 231\\\/18.7PBGMR.S1 \u2013 2021-01-14\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 231\/18.7PBGMR.S1 \u2013 2021-01-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 231\/18.7PBGMR.S1 \u2013 2021-01-14","og_description":"Relator: HELENA MONIZ. I - Nas situa\u00e7\u00f5es em que o Tribunal procede \u00e0 realiza\u00e7\u00e3o do c\u00famulo jur\u00eddico de penas sem previamente apurar da situa\u00e7\u00e3o concreta da pena suspensa cujo per\u00edodo de suspens\u00e3o se mostre j\u00e1 decorrido, \u00e9 uniforme o entendimento do STJ de que, em semelhante caso, o tribunal incorre em nulidade. II - Uma vez que nada \u00e9 referido quanto \u00e0 extin\u00e7\u00e3o da pena suspensa na sua execu\u00e7\u00e3o no ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o recorrido, nem resulta dos autos, n\u00e3o se sabendo se j\u00e1 foi (ou n\u00e3o) declarada extinta (caso em que n\u00e3o deveria ser integrada no c\u00famulo jur\u00eddico), e seguindo jurisprud\u00eancia constante deste STJ, o ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o recorrido \u00e9 nulo, nos termos do art. 379.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, al. c), do CPP.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-13T21:56:42+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 231\/18.7PBGMR.S1 \u2013 2021-01-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-27T22:48:01+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-13T21:56:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-231-18-7pbgmr-s1-2021-01-14\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 231\/18.7PBGMR.S1 \u2013 2021-01-14"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/715089","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=715089"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=715089"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=715089"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=715089"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=715089"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=715089"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=715089"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=715089"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}