{"id":729314,"date":"2026-04-28T12:03:03","date_gmt":"2026-04-28T10:03:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\/"},"modified":"2026-04-28T12:03:03","modified_gmt":"2026-04-28T10:03:03","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 775\/18.0T9LRA.C1-B.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: HELENA MONIZ. I — O ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o de Coimbra era irrecorr?vel, por for?a do disposto nos arts. 432.?, n.? 1, al. b) e 400.?, n.? 1, al. c), ambos do CPP. Aquele ac?rd?o apenas admitia, eventualmente, recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, nos termos do art. 75.?, n,? 1, da Lei n.? 28\/82, de 15.11 (e altera??es posteriores); sabendo que n?o era admiss?vel recurso ordin?rio do ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o de Coimbra, no prazo de 30 dias ap?s o seu tr?nsito poderia ter sido interposto o recurso para fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia. II — Os factos relevantes foram elencados, foi apresentada a fundamenta??o de direito, e de forma clara exp?s-se a decis?o, pelo que improcede a argui??o de nulidade nos termos do art. 379.?, n.? 1, al. a), ex vi art. 425.? n.? 4, ambos do CPP. III — Havendo legisla??o espec?fica no C?digo de Processo Penal quanto aos recursos para fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia n?o h? lugar ? integra??o de uma lacuna (inexistente) nos termos do art. 4.?, do CPP, pelo que n?o h? fundamento para aplica??o das regras do C?digo de Processo Civil.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: HELENA MONIZ. I — O ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o de Coimbra era irrecorr?vel, por for?a do disposto nos arts. 432.?, n.? 1, al. b) e 400.?, n.? 1, al. c), ambos do CPP. Aquele ac?rd?o apenas admitia, eventualmente, recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, nos termos do art. 75.?, n,? 1, da Lei n.? 28\/82, de 15.11 (e altera??es posteriores); sabendo que n?o era admiss?vel recurso ordin?rio do ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o de Coimbra, no prazo de 30 dias ap?s o seu tr?nsito poderia ter sido interposto o recurso para fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia. II — Os factos relevantes foram elencados, foi apresentada a fundamenta??o de direito, e de forma clara exp?s-se a decis?o, pelo que improcede a argui??o de nulidade nos termos do art. 379.?, n.? 1, al. a), ex vi art. 425.? n.? 4, ambos do CPP. III — Havendo legisla??o espec?fica no C?digo de Processo Penal quanto aos recursos para fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia n?o h? lugar ? integra??o de uma lacuna (inexistente) nos termos do art. 4.?, do CPP, pelo que n?o h? fundamento para aplica??o das regras do C?digo de Processo Civil.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[41198],"kji_subject":[7660],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-729314","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-41198","kji_subject-constitutionnel","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 775\/18.0T9LRA.C1-B.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 775\/18.0T9LRA.C1-B.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: HELENA MONIZ. I - O ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o de Coimbra era irrecorr?vel, por for?a do disposto nos arts. 432.?, n.? 1, al. b) e 400.?, n.? 1, al. c), ambos do CPP. Aquele ac?rd?o apenas admitia, eventualmente, recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, nos termos do art. 75.?, n,? 1, da Lei n.? 28\/82, de 15.11 (e altera??es posteriores); sabendo que n?o era admiss?vel recurso ordin?rio do ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o de Coimbra, no prazo de 30 dias ap?s o seu tr?nsito poderia ter sido interposto o recurso para fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia. II - Os factos relevantes foram elencados, foi apresentada a fundamenta??o de direito, e de forma clara exp?s-se a decis?o, pelo que improcede a argui??o de nulidade nos termos do art. 379.?, n.? 1, al. a), ex vi art. 425.? n.? 4, ambos do CPP. III - Havendo legisla??o espec?fica no C?digo de Processo Penal quanto aos recursos para fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia n?o h? lugar ? integra??o de uma lacuna (inexistente) nos termos do art. 4.?, do CPP, pelo que n?o h? fundamento para aplica??o das regras do C?digo de Processo Civil.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 775\\\/18.0T9LRA.C1-B.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-28T10:03:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 775\\\/18.0T9LRA.C1-B.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 775\/18.0T9LRA.C1-B.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 775\/18.0T9LRA.C1-B.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29","og_description":"Relator: HELENA MONIZ. I - O ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o de Coimbra era irrecorr?vel, por for?a do disposto nos arts. 432.?, n.? 1, al. b) e 400.?, n.? 1, al. c), ambos do CPP. Aquele ac?rd?o apenas admitia, eventualmente, recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional, nos termos do art. 75.?, n,? 1, da Lei n.? 28\/82, de 15.11 (e altera??es posteriores); sabendo que n?o era admiss?vel recurso ordin?rio do ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o de Coimbra, no prazo de 30 dias ap?s o seu tr?nsito poderia ter sido interposto o recurso para fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia. II - Os factos relevantes foram elencados, foi apresentada a fundamenta??o de direito, e de forma clara exp?s-se a decis?o, pelo que improcede a argui??o de nulidade nos termos do art. 379.?, n.? 1, al. a), ex vi art. 425.? n.? 4, ambos do CPP. III - Havendo legisla??o espec?fica no C?digo de Processo Penal quanto aos recursos para fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia n?o h? lugar ? integra??o de uma lacuna (inexistente) nos termos do art. 4.?, do CPP, pelo que n?o h? fundamento para aplica??o das regras do C?digo de Processo Civil.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 775\/18.0T9LRA.C1-B.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-28T10:03:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-775-18-0t9lra-c1-b-s1-2020-10-29\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 775\/18.0T9LRA.C1-B.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/729314","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=729314"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=729314"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=729314"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=729314"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=729314"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=729314"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=729314"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=729314"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}