{"id":729439,"date":"2026-04-28T12:14:01","date_gmt":"2026-04-28T10:14:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\/"},"modified":"2026-04-28T12:14:01","modified_gmt":"2026-04-28T10:14:01","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 49\/13.3IDFUN-C.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: FRANCISCO CAETANO. I. A provid?ncia de habeas corpus enquanto meio extraordin?rio e expedito n?o visa a sindic?ncia de decis?es proferidas no processo objecto da condena??o e s? a ilegalidade da pris?o que seja manifesta, grosseira, inequ?voca, a pode justificar; II. O despacho que indeferiu a susta??o do cumprimento de mandados de deten??o para cumprimento da pena e que atribuiu ao recurso interposto efeito devolutivo ? mat?ria cuja aprecia??o n?o cabe na provid?ncia, antes ? rela??o quanto ao recurso e seu presidente quanto ? impugna??o do efeito fixado; III. O facto de a pena de pris?o vir integrar uma pena ?nica conjunta resultante de um concurso de crimes de conhecimento superveniente e, da?, n?o ser uma pena que possa ser executada por ser il?quida, na express?o do requerente, nada obsta ? execu??o em curso, que desde logo deixa marcado o in?cio do seu cumprimento, essa sendo, de resto, a situa??o normal dos casos de conhecimento superveniente do concurso, sendo certo tamb?m que o eventual cumprimento da pena parcelar n?o deixar? de ser descontado no cumprimento da pena ?nica que eventualmente vier a ser aplicada (art.? 78.?, n.? 1, do CP).<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: FRANCISCO CAETANO. I. A provid?ncia de habeas corpus enquanto meio extraordin?rio e expedito n?o visa a sindic?ncia de decis?es proferidas no processo objecto da condena??o e s? a ilegalidade da pris?o que seja manifesta, grosseira, inequ?voca, a pode justificar; II. O despacho que indeferiu a susta??o do cumprimento de mandados de deten??o para cumprimento da pena e que atribuiu ao recurso interposto efeito devolutivo ? mat?ria cuja aprecia??o n?o cabe na provid?ncia, antes ? rela??o quanto ao recurso e seu presidente quanto ? impugna??o do efeito fixado; III. O facto de a pena de pris?o vir integrar uma pena ?nica conjunta resultante de um concurso de crimes de conhecimento superveniente e, da?, n?o ser uma pena que possa ser executada por ser il?quida, na express?o do requerente, nada obsta ? execu??o em curso, que desde logo deixa marcado o in?cio do seu cumprimento, essa sendo, de resto, a situa??o normal dos casos de conhecimento superveniente do concurso, sendo certo tamb?m que o eventual cumprimento da pena parcelar n?o deixar? de ser descontado no cumprimento da pena ?nica que eventualmente vier a ser aplicada (art.? 78.?, n.? 1, do CP).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[41198],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7772,42275,7774,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-729439","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-41198","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-idfun-c","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 49\/13.3IDFUN-C.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 49\/13.3IDFUN-C.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: FRANCISCO CAETANO. I. A provid?ncia de habeas corpus enquanto meio extraordin?rio e expedito n?o visa a sindic?ncia de decis?es proferidas no processo objecto da condena??o e s? a ilegalidade da pris?o que seja manifesta, grosseira, inequ?voca, a pode justificar; II. O despacho que indeferiu a susta??o do cumprimento de mandados de deten??o para cumprimento da pena e que atribuiu ao recurso interposto efeito devolutivo ? mat?ria cuja aprecia??o n?o cabe na provid?ncia, antes ? rela??o quanto ao recurso e seu presidente quanto ? impugna??o do efeito fixado; III. O facto de a pena de pris?o vir integrar uma pena ?nica conjunta resultante de um concurso de crimes de conhecimento superveniente e, da?, n?o ser uma pena que possa ser executada por ser il?quida, na express?o do requerente, nada obsta ? execu??o em curso, que desde logo deixa marcado o in?cio do seu cumprimento, essa sendo, de resto, a situa??o normal dos casos de conhecimento superveniente do concurso, sendo certo tamb?m que o eventual cumprimento da pena parcelar n?o deixar? de ser descontado no cumprimento da pena ?nica que eventualmente vier a ser aplicada (art.? 78.?, n.? 1, do CP).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 49\\\/13.3IDFUN-C.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-28T10:14:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 49\\\/13.3IDFUN-C.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 49\/13.3IDFUN-C.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 49\/13.3IDFUN-C.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29","og_description":"Relator: FRANCISCO CAETANO. I. A provid?ncia de habeas corpus enquanto meio extraordin?rio e expedito n?o visa a sindic?ncia de decis?es proferidas no processo objecto da condena??o e s? a ilegalidade da pris?o que seja manifesta, grosseira, inequ?voca, a pode justificar; II. O despacho que indeferiu a susta??o do cumprimento de mandados de deten??o para cumprimento da pena e que atribuiu ao recurso interposto efeito devolutivo ? mat?ria cuja aprecia??o n?o cabe na provid?ncia, antes ? rela??o quanto ao recurso e seu presidente quanto ? impugna??o do efeito fixado; III. O facto de a pena de pris?o vir integrar uma pena ?nica conjunta resultante de um concurso de crimes de conhecimento superveniente e, da?, n?o ser uma pena que possa ser executada por ser il?quida, na express?o do requerente, nada obsta ? execu??o em curso, que desde logo deixa marcado o in?cio do seu cumprimento, essa sendo, de resto, a situa??o normal dos casos de conhecimento superveniente do concurso, sendo certo tamb?m que o eventual cumprimento da pena parcelar n?o deixar? de ser descontado no cumprimento da pena ?nica que eventualmente vier a ser aplicada (art.? 78.?, n.? 1, do CP).","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 49\/13.3IDFUN-C.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-28T10:14:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-49-13-3idfun-c-s1-2020-10-29\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 49\/13.3IDFUN-C.S1 \u2013 2020-10-29"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/729439","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=729439"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=729439"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=729439"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=729439"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=729439"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=729439"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=729439"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=729439"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}