{"id":735786,"date":"2026-04-28T19:08:35","date_gmt":"2026-04-28T17:08:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\/"},"modified":"2026-04-28T19:08:35","modified_gmt":"2026-04-28T17:08:35","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1917\/18.1T8FIG.C1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-14"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: CHAMBEL MOURISCO. Tendo as inst?ncias, sido convergentes, considerando o? princ?pio do sal?rio igual por trabalho igual, nunca o tendo posto em causa, ao decidir que o insucesso da pretens?o do A., derivou do facto de n?o se ter provado que n?o houvesse um fundamento admiss?vel para o pagamento de retribui??es diferenciadas a dois trabalhadores com a mesma categoria e fun??es, tendo, antes, ficado provado que houve, ab initio, uma raz?o efetiva e atend?vel para essa distin??o de remunera??es, n?o se justifica assim a interven??o do STJ, em sede de revista excecional, pois, no contexto espec?fico, a quest?o jur?dica suscitada n?o apresenta um car?cter paradigm?tico e exemplar, que possa ser transpon?vel para outras situa??es, n?o assumindo relev?ncia aut?noma e independente em rela??o aos interesses das partes nestes autos, n?o se verificando tamb?m, pelas mesmas raz?es, que os interesses que est?o em causa tenham a particular relev?ncia social exigida pela lei, na medida em que os valores a ponderar, n?o se sobrep?em ao mero interesse subjetivo da parte interessada no acesso a um terceiro grau de jurisdi??o. Chambel Mourisco<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: CHAMBEL MOURISCO. Tendo as inst?ncias, sido convergentes, considerando o? princ?pio do sal?rio igual por trabalho igual, nunca o tendo posto em causa, ao decidir que o insucesso da pretens?o do A., derivou do facto de n?o se ter provado que n?o houvesse um fundamento admiss?vel para o pagamento de retribui??es diferenciadas a dois trabalhadores com a mesma categoria e fun??es, tendo, antes, ficado provado que houve, ab initio, uma raz?o efetiva e atend?vel para essa distin??o de remunera??es, n?o se justifica assim a interven??o do STJ, em sede de revista excecional, pois, no contexto espec?fico, a quest?o jur?dica suscitada n?o apresenta um car?cter paradigm?tico e exemplar, que possa ser transpon?vel para outras situa??es, n?o assumindo relev?ncia aut?noma e independente em rela??o aos interesses das partes nestes autos, n?o se verificando tamb?m, pelas mesmas raz?es, que os interesses que est?o em causa tenham a particular relev?ncia social exigida pela lei, na medida em que os valores a ponderar, n?o se sobrep?em ao mero interesse subjetivo da parte interessada no acesso a um terceiro grau de jurisdi??o. Chambel Mourisco<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7764],"kji_year":[41198],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-735786","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-4-seco","kji_year-41198","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1917\/18.1T8FIG.C1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1917\/18.1T8FIG.C1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-14\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: CHAMBEL MOURISCO. Tendo as inst?ncias, sido convergentes, considerando o? princ?pio do sal?rio igual por trabalho igual, nunca o tendo posto em causa, ao decidir que o insucesso da pretens?o do A., derivou do facto de n?o se ter provado que n?o houvesse um fundamento admiss?vel para o pagamento de retribui??es diferenciadas a dois trabalhadores com a mesma categoria e fun??es, tendo, antes, ficado provado que houve, ab initio, uma raz?o efetiva e atend?vel para essa distin??o de remunera??es, n?o se justifica assim a interven??o do STJ, em sede de revista excecional, pois, no contexto espec?fico, a quest?o jur?dica suscitada n?o apresenta um car?cter paradigm?tico e exemplar, que possa ser transpon?vel para outras situa??es, n?o assumindo relev?ncia aut?noma e independente em rela??o aos interesses das partes nestes autos, n?o se verificando tamb?m, pelas mesmas raz?es, que os interesses que est?o em causa tenham a particular relev?ncia social exigida pela lei, na medida em que os valores a ponderar, n?o se sobrep?em ao mero interesse subjetivo da parte interessada no acesso a um terceiro grau de jurisdi??o. Chambel Mourisco\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1917\\\/18.1T8FIG.C1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-28T17:08:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1917\\\/18.1T8FIG.C1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-14\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1917\/18.1T8FIG.C1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1917\/18.1T8FIG.C1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-14","og_description":"Relator: CHAMBEL MOURISCO. Tendo as inst?ncias, sido convergentes, considerando o? princ?pio do sal?rio igual por trabalho igual, nunca o tendo posto em causa, ao decidir que o insucesso da pretens?o do A., derivou do facto de n?o se ter provado que n?o houvesse um fundamento admiss?vel para o pagamento de retribui??es diferenciadas a dois trabalhadores com a mesma categoria e fun??es, tendo, antes, ficado provado que houve, ab initio, uma raz?o efetiva e atend?vel para essa distin??o de remunera??es, n?o se justifica assim a interven??o do STJ, em sede de revista excecional, pois, no contexto espec?fico, a quest?o jur?dica suscitada n?o apresenta um car?cter paradigm?tico e exemplar, que possa ser transpon?vel para outras situa??es, n?o assumindo relev?ncia aut?noma e independente em rela??o aos interesses das partes nestes autos, n?o se verificando tamb?m, pelas mesmas raz?es, que os interesses que est?o em causa tenham a particular relev?ncia social exigida pela lei, na medida em que os valores a ponderar, n?o se sobrep?em ao mero interesse subjetivo da parte interessada no acesso a um terceiro grau de jurisdi??o. Chambel Mourisco","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1917\/18.1T8FIG.C1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-28T17:08:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-1917-18-1t8fig-c1-s2-2020-10-14\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 1917\/18.1T8FIG.C1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-14"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/735786","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=735786"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=735786"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=735786"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=735786"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=735786"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=735786"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=735786"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=735786"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}