{"id":735795,"date":"2026-04-28T19:08:52","date_gmt":"2026-04-28T17:08:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\/"},"modified":"2026-04-28T19:08:52","modified_gmt":"2026-04-28T17:08:52","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 657\/19.9T8CSC.S1 \u2013 2020-10-14"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: JOS? FETEIRA. Sum?rio (663? n.? 7 CPC) — A lei (art. 629? n.? 1 do CPC) consagra um regime h?brido ou misto quanto ? admissibilidade de recurso, uma vez que esta depende, cumulativa e simultaneamente, do valor da causa (al?ada) e do valor da sucumb?ncia (differendum), porquanto, para al?m do valor da causa, ? necess?rio que a decis?o impugnada seja desfavor?vel ao recorrente em valor superior a metade da al?ada do tribunal de que se recorre relevando, no entanto, apenas aquele, em caso de fundada d?vida sobre este; — No recurso de revista ?per saltum?, exige-se claramente que o valor da causa seja superior ao da al?ada do Tribunal da Rela??o e que a decis?o impugnada seja desfavor?vel para o recorrente em valor superior a metade da al?ada desse Tribunal [art. 678? n.? 1 als. a) e b]; — No presente caso, verificando-se o valor da causa ? superior ao da al?ada do Tribunal da Rela??o, constata-se, sem margem para fundada d?vida, que o valor da sucumb?ncia do Recorrente ? inferior ao daquela al?ada e da? que n?o seja admiss?vel o recurso de revista ?per saltum? para o STJ. Jos? Feteira (relator)<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: JOS? FETEIRA. Sum?rio (663? n.? 7 CPC) — A lei (art. 629? n.? 1 do CPC) consagra um regime h?brido ou misto quanto ? admissibilidade de recurso, uma vez que esta depende, cumulativa e simultaneamente, do valor da causa (al?ada) e do valor da sucumb?ncia (differendum), porquanto, para al?m do valor da causa, ? necess?rio que a decis?o impugnada seja desfavor?vel ao recorrente em valor superior a metade da al?ada do tribunal de que se recorre relevando, no entanto, apenas aquele, em caso de fundada d?vida sobre este; — No recurso de revista ?per saltum?, exige-se claramente que o valor da causa seja superior ao da al?ada do Tribunal da Rela??o e que a decis?o impugnada seja desfavor?vel para o recorrente em valor superior a metade da al?ada desse Tribunal [art. 678? n.? 1 als. a) e b]; — No presente caso, verificando-se o valor da causa ? superior ao da al?ada do Tribunal da Rela??o, constata-se, sem margem para fundada d?vida, que o valor da sucumb?ncia do Recorrente ? inferior ao daquela al?ada e da? que n?o seja admiss?vel o recurso de revista ?per saltum? para o STJ. Jos? Feteira (relator)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7764],"kji_year":[41198],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-735795","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-4-seco","kji_year-41198","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 657\/19.9T8CSC.S1 \u2013 2020-10-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 657\/19.9T8CSC.S1 \u2013 2020-10-14\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: JOS? FETEIRA. Sum?rio (663? n.? 7 CPC) - A lei (art. 629? n.? 1 do CPC) consagra um regime h?brido ou misto quanto ? admissibilidade de recurso, uma vez que esta depende, cumulativa e simultaneamente, do valor da causa (al?ada) e do valor da sucumb?ncia (differendum), porquanto, para al?m do valor da causa, ? necess?rio que a decis?o impugnada seja desfavor?vel ao recorrente em valor superior a metade da al?ada do tribunal de que se recorre relevando, no entanto, apenas aquele, em caso de fundada d?vida sobre este; - No recurso de revista ?per saltum?, exige-se claramente que o valor da causa seja superior ao da al?ada do Tribunal da Rela??o e que a decis?o impugnada seja desfavor?vel para o recorrente em valor superior a metade da al?ada desse Tribunal [art. 678? n.? 1 als. a) e b]; - No presente caso, verificando-se o valor da causa ? superior ao da al?ada do Tribunal da Rela??o, constata-se, sem margem para fundada d?vida, que o valor da sucumb?ncia do Recorrente ? inferior ao daquela al?ada e da? que n?o seja admiss?vel o recurso de revista ?per saltum? para o STJ. Jos? Feteira (relator)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 657\\\/19.9T8CSC.S1 \u2013 2020-10-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-28T17:08:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 657\\\/19.9T8CSC.S1 \u2013 2020-10-14\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 657\/19.9T8CSC.S1 \u2013 2020-10-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 657\/19.9T8CSC.S1 \u2013 2020-10-14","og_description":"Relator: JOS? FETEIRA. Sum?rio (663? n.? 7 CPC) - A lei (art. 629? n.? 1 do CPC) consagra um regime h?brido ou misto quanto ? admissibilidade de recurso, uma vez que esta depende, cumulativa e simultaneamente, do valor da causa (al?ada) e do valor da sucumb?ncia (differendum), porquanto, para al?m do valor da causa, ? necess?rio que a decis?o impugnada seja desfavor?vel ao recorrente em valor superior a metade da al?ada do tribunal de que se recorre relevando, no entanto, apenas aquele, em caso de fundada d?vida sobre este; - No recurso de revista ?per saltum?, exige-se claramente que o valor da causa seja superior ao da al?ada do Tribunal da Rela??o e que a decis?o impugnada seja desfavor?vel para o recorrente em valor superior a metade da al?ada desse Tribunal [art. 678? n.? 1 als. a) e b]; - No presente caso, verificando-se o valor da causa ? superior ao da al?ada do Tribunal da Rela??o, constata-se, sem margem para fundada d?vida, que o valor da sucumb?ncia do Recorrente ? inferior ao daquela al?ada e da? que n?o seja admiss?vel o recurso de revista ?per saltum? para o STJ. Jos? Feteira (relator)","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 657\/19.9T8CSC.S1 \u2013 2020-10-14 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-28T17:08:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-657-19-9t8csc-s1-2020-10-14\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 657\/19.9T8CSC.S1 \u2013 2020-10-14"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/735795","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=735795"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=735795"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=735795"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=735795"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=735795"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=735795"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=735795"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=735795"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}