{"id":736170,"date":"2026-04-28T19:36:14","date_gmt":"2026-04-28T17:36:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\/"},"modified":"2026-05-14T04:59:26","modified_gmt":"2026-05-14T02:59:26","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2491\/12.8TBVCT.G1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-13"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: ANT\u00d3NIO MAGALH\u00c3ES. I — \u00c9 ao c\u00f4njuge, que pretende demonstrar que os valores utilizados na aquisi\u00e7\u00e3o de um bem provieram do seu patrim\u00f3nio, que compete fazer essa prova e afastar a qualifica\u00e7\u00e3o daquele bem como comum, qualifica\u00e7\u00e3o que resulta da inobserv\u00e2ncia dos requisitos estabelecidos no art. 1723.\u00ba, al. c), e assenta, em \u00faltima an\u00e1lise, na presun\u00e7\u00e3o de comunh\u00e3o do art. 1724.\u00ba do CC. II — Tendo a Rela\u00e7\u00e3o fundado a sua decis\u00e3o \u2013 de que as obras de beneficia\u00e7\u00e3o realizadas na casa de morada de fam\u00edlia, na const\u00e2ncia do matrim\u00f3nio, tinham sido custadas com dinheiro exclusivo do cabe\u00e7a de casal \u2013 na exclusiva considera\u00e7\u00e3o de que a reclamante n\u00e3o tinha logrado fazer a prova de que essas benfeitorias tinham sido custeadas com dinheiro comum (quando o \u00f3nus pertencia ao cabe\u00e7a de casal) deve essa decis\u00e3o ser alterada, por viola\u00e7\u00e3o do disposto no art. 342.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CC. III — N\u00e3o contemplando o contrato-promessa de partilha celebrado entre os c\u00f4njuges o valor (comum) das benfeitorias \u00fateis, n\u00e3o pode o tribunal pronunciar-se pela validade do contrato-promessa sem a avalia\u00e7\u00e3o daquelas benfeitorias realizadas na casa de habita\u00e7\u00e3o dos ex-c\u00f4njuges (bem pr\u00f3prio), de cujo valor (a ser reconhecido) a ex-c\u00f4njuge n\u00e3o foi compensada.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: ANT\u00d3NIO MAGALH\u00c3ES. I — \u00c9 ao c\u00f4njuge, que pretende demonstrar que os valores utilizados na aquisi\u00e7\u00e3o de um bem provieram do seu patrim\u00f3nio, que compete fazer essa prova e afastar a qualifica\u00e7\u00e3o daquele bem como comum, qualifica\u00e7\u00e3o que resulta da inobserv\u00e2ncia dos requisitos estabelecidos no art. 1723.\u00ba, al. c), e assenta, em \u00faltima an\u00e1lise, na presun\u00e7\u00e3o de comunh\u00e3o do art. 1724.\u00ba do CC. II — Tendo a Rela\u00e7\u00e3o fundado a sua decis\u00e3o \u2013 de que as obras de beneficia\u00e7\u00e3o realizadas na casa de morada de fam\u00edlia, na const\u00e2ncia do matrim\u00f3nio, tinham sido custadas com dinheiro exclusivo do cabe\u00e7a de casal \u2013 na exclusiva considera\u00e7\u00e3o de que a reclamante n\u00e3o tinha logrado fazer a prova de que essas benfeitorias tinham sido custeadas com dinheiro comum (quando o \u00f3nus pertencia ao cabe\u00e7a de casal) deve essa decis\u00e3o ser alterada, por viola\u00e7\u00e3o do disposto no art. 342.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CC. III — N\u00e3o contemplando o contrato-promessa de partilha celebrado entre os c\u00f4njuges o valor (comum) das benfeitorias \u00fateis, n\u00e3o pode o tribunal pronunciar-se pela validade do contrato-promessa sem a avalia\u00e7\u00e3o daquelas benfeitorias realizadas na casa de habita\u00e7\u00e3o dos ex-c\u00f4njuges (bem pr\u00f3prio), de cujo valor (a ser reconhecido) a ex-c\u00f4njuge n\u00e3o foi compensada.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[41198],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7773,42745,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-736170","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-41198","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tbvct","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2491\/12.8TBVCT.G1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2491\/12.8TBVCT.G1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-13\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ANT\u00d3NIO MAGALH\u00c3ES. I - \u00c9 ao c\u00f4njuge, que pretende demonstrar que os valores utilizados na aquisi\u00e7\u00e3o de um bem provieram do seu patrim\u00f3nio, que compete fazer essa prova e afastar a qualifica\u00e7\u00e3o daquele bem como comum, qualifica\u00e7\u00e3o que resulta da inobserv\u00e2ncia dos requisitos estabelecidos no art. 1723.\u00ba, al. c), e assenta, em \u00faltima an\u00e1lise, na presun\u00e7\u00e3o de comunh\u00e3o do art. 1724.\u00ba do CC. II - Tendo a Rela\u00e7\u00e3o fundado a sua decis\u00e3o \u2013 de que as obras de beneficia\u00e7\u00e3o realizadas na casa de morada de fam\u00edlia, na const\u00e2ncia do matrim\u00f3nio, tinham sido custadas com dinheiro exclusivo do cabe\u00e7a de casal \u2013 na exclusiva considera\u00e7\u00e3o de que a reclamante n\u00e3o tinha logrado fazer a prova de que essas benfeitorias tinham sido custeadas com dinheiro comum (quando o \u00f3nus pertencia ao cabe\u00e7a de casal) deve essa decis\u00e3o ser alterada, por viola\u00e7\u00e3o do disposto no art. 342.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CC. III - N\u00e3o contemplando o contrato-promessa de partilha celebrado entre os c\u00f4njuges o valor (comum) das benfeitorias \u00fateis, n\u00e3o pode o tribunal pronunciar-se pela validade do contrato-promessa sem a avalia\u00e7\u00e3o daquelas benfeitorias realizadas na casa de habita\u00e7\u00e3o dos ex-c\u00f4njuges (bem pr\u00f3prio), de cujo valor (a ser reconhecido) a ex-c\u00f4njuge n\u00e3o foi compensada.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-14T02:59:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2491\\\/12.8TBVCT.G1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-28T17:36:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-14T02:59:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2491\\\/12.8TBVCT.G1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-13\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2491\/12.8TBVCT.G1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2491\/12.8TBVCT.G1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-13","og_description":"Relator: ANT\u00d3NIO MAGALH\u00c3ES. I - \u00c9 ao c\u00f4njuge, que pretende demonstrar que os valores utilizados na aquisi\u00e7\u00e3o de um bem provieram do seu patrim\u00f3nio, que compete fazer essa prova e afastar a qualifica\u00e7\u00e3o daquele bem como comum, qualifica\u00e7\u00e3o que resulta da inobserv\u00e2ncia dos requisitos estabelecidos no art. 1723.\u00ba, al. c), e assenta, em \u00faltima an\u00e1lise, na presun\u00e7\u00e3o de comunh\u00e3o do art. 1724.\u00ba do CC. II - Tendo a Rela\u00e7\u00e3o fundado a sua decis\u00e3o \u2013 de que as obras de beneficia\u00e7\u00e3o realizadas na casa de morada de fam\u00edlia, na const\u00e2ncia do matrim\u00f3nio, tinham sido custadas com dinheiro exclusivo do cabe\u00e7a de casal \u2013 na exclusiva considera\u00e7\u00e3o de que a reclamante n\u00e3o tinha logrado fazer a prova de que essas benfeitorias tinham sido custeadas com dinheiro comum (quando o \u00f3nus pertencia ao cabe\u00e7a de casal) deve essa decis\u00e3o ser alterada, por viola\u00e7\u00e3o do disposto no art. 342.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do CC. III - N\u00e3o contemplando o contrato-promessa de partilha celebrado entre os c\u00f4njuges o valor (comum) das benfeitorias \u00fateis, n\u00e3o pode o tribunal pronunciar-se pela validade do contrato-promessa sem a avalia\u00e7\u00e3o daquelas benfeitorias realizadas na casa de habita\u00e7\u00e3o dos ex-c\u00f4njuges (bem pr\u00f3prio), de cujo valor (a ser reconhecido) a ex-c\u00f4njuge n\u00e3o foi compensada.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-14T02:59:26+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2491\/12.8TBVCT.G1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-13 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-28T17:36:14+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-14T02:59:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2491-12-8tbvct-g1-s2-2020-10-13\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2491\/12.8TBVCT.G1.S2 \u2013 2020-10-13"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/736170","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=736170"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=736170"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=736170"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=736170"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=736170"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=736170"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=736170"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=736170"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}