{"id":745891,"date":"2026-04-29T06:13:55","date_gmt":"2026-04-29T04:13:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\/"},"modified":"2026-04-29T06:13:55","modified_gmt":"2026-04-29T04:13:55","slug":"kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\/","title":{"rendered":"KHO 26.6.2020\/2804 — Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade att avg\u00f6ra om behandlingen av den afghanske medborgaren A:s \u00e4rende som g\u00e4llde internationellt skydd enligt 87 \u00a7 och 88 \u00a7 och uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd som beviljas enligt 52 \u00a7 i utl\u00e4nningslagen hade f\u00f6rdr\u00f6jts i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen p\u00e5 ett s\u00e5dant s\u00e4tt att hen hade r\u00e4tt till en sk\u00e4lig gottg\u00f6relse av statens medel enligt 6 \u00a7 i lagen om gottg\u00f6relse f\u00f6r dr\u00f6jsm\u00e5l vid r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ng (gottg\u00f6relselagen). Vidare skulle avg\u00f6ras om besv\u00e4ren som g\u00e4llde internationellt skydd var ett s\u00e5dant \u00e4rende enligt 6 \u00a7 2 mom. i gottg\u00f6relselagen som \u00e4r av s\u00e4rskilt stor betydelse f\u00f6r parten och f\u00f6r vilket gottg\u00f6relsens sammanlagda belopp vid dr\u00f6jsm\u00e5l enligt n\u00e4mnda lagrum skulle h\u00f6jas med h\u00f6gst 2000 euro.<\/p>\n

H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade att vid bed\u00f6mningen av huruvida en r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ng har f\u00f6rdr\u00f6jts ska enligt 4 \u00a7 i gottg\u00f6relselagen ut\u00f6ver r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngens l\u00e4ngd s\u00e4rskilt beaktas m\u00e5lets eller \u00e4rendets natur och omfattning, hur parterna, myndigheterna och domstolen har agerat under r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngen och sakens betydelse f\u00f6r parten. H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade ocks\u00e5 att dr\u00f6jsm\u00e5l som beror p\u00e5 bristande resurser eller andra strukturella omst\u00e4ndigheter inte p\u00e5verkar den aktuella myndighetens skyldighet att avg\u00f6ra \u00e4rendet inom rimlig tid.<\/p>\n

\u00c4rendets behandling i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade varat i cirka tv\u00e5 \u00e5r och nio m\u00e5nader. A hade hos f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen yrkat p\u00e5 gottg\u00f6relse f\u00f6r dr\u00f6jsm\u00e5l vid r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ng d\u00e5 besv\u00e4ren varit anh\u00e4ngiga omkring tv\u00e5 \u00e5r och \u00e5tta m\u00e5nader.<\/p>\n

\u00c4rendet var till sin natur och omfattning typiskt inom \u00e4rendekategorin f\u00f6r internationellt skydd och det inneh\u00f6ll inga s\u00e4rskilt sv\u00e5ra fr\u00e5gor g\u00e4llande omst\u00e4ndigheter eller r\u00e4ttsliga aspekter. Ingen muntlig f\u00f6rhandling i syfte att utreda \u00e4rendet hade h\u00e5llits. \u00c4rendet skulle enligt utl\u00e4nningslagen behandlas skyndsamt och A hade inte med sitt eget agerande p\u00e5verkat f\u00f6rdr\u00f6jningen av \u00e4rendets behandling. Med ytterligare beaktande av \u00e4rendets natur, omfattning och betydelse f\u00f6r A, skulle \u00e4rendets behandlingstid anses vara osk\u00e4ligt l\u00e5ng. H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen ans\u00e5g att \u00e4rendets behandling i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade f\u00f6rdr\u00f6jts av orsaker som berodde p\u00e5 f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen p\u00e5 det s\u00e4tt som avses i gottg\u00f6relselagen. H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen ans\u00e5g att A skulle erh\u00e5lla gottg\u00f6relse f\u00f6r dr\u00f6jsm\u00e5l vid r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ng motsvarande ett belopp f\u00f6r ett \u00e5rs tidsperiod det vill s\u00e4ga 1 500 euro.<\/p>\n

H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade vidare att \u00e4rendet hade g\u00e4llt A:s r\u00e4ttsliga st\u00e4llning och det d\u00e4rf\u00f6r kunde anses vara av s\u00e4rskild betydelse f\u00f6r hen enligt 6 \u00a7 2 mom. i gott\u00f6relselagen, vilket m\u00f6jliggjorde en h\u00f6jning av gottg\u00f6relsens sammanlagda belopp. Med beaktande av l\u00e4ngden av dr\u00f6jsm\u00e5let vid r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngen ans\u00e5g h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen att den ovan n\u00e4mnda gottg\u00f6relsens sammanlagda belopp 1 500 euro kunde h\u00f6jas med 500 euro. Yrkandet avslogs till \u00f6vriga delar.<\/p>\n

Finlands grundlag 21 \u00a7<\/h3>\n

Europeiska m\u00e4nniskor\u00e4ttskonventionen art. 13<\/p>\n

Europeiska unionens stadga om de grundl\u00e4ggande r\u00e4ttigheterna art. 47.1 och 2<\/p>\n

Utl\u00e4nningslagen 87 \u00a7, 88 \u00a7 och 193 \u00a7 3 mom.<\/p>\n

Lagen om gottg\u00f6relse f\u00f6r dr\u00f6jsm\u00e5l vid r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ng 3 \u00a7 1 mom., 4 \u00a7 1 och 2 mom., 5 \u00a7 2 mom., 6 \u00a7 1 och 2 mom. samt 10 \u00a7<\/p>\n

\u00c4rendet har avgjorts av justitier\u00e5den Riitta Mutikainen, Mika Sepp\u00e4l\u00e4, Kari Tornikoski, Tuomas Kuokkanen, Taina Pyysaari, Monica Gullans, Pekka Aalto och Juha Lavapuro. F\u00f6redragande Juuso Peltonen.<\/p>\n

Korkeimmassa hallinto-oikeudessa oli ratkaistavana, oliko Afganistanin kansalaisen A:n ulkomaalaislain 87 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 ja 88 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 tarkoitettua kansainv\u00e4list\u00e4 suojelua tai ulkomaalaislain 52 \u00a7:n perusteella my\u00f6nnett\u00e4v\u00e4\u00e4 oleskelulupaa koskevan asian k\u00e4sittely hallinto-oikeudessa viiv\u00e4stynyt siten, ett\u00e4 h\u00e4nell\u00e4 oli oikeus saada valtion varoista oikeudenk\u00e4ynnin viiv\u00e4stymisen hyvitt\u00e4misest\u00e4 annetun lain (<\/p>\n

) 6 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 tarkoitettu kohtuullinen hyvitys. Lis\u00e4ksi ratkaistavana oli kysymys siit\u00e4, oliko kansainv\u00e4list\u00e4 suojelua koskevaa valitusasiaa pidett\u00e4v\u00e4 sellaisena hyvityslain 6 \u00a7:n 2 momentissa tarkoitettuna asianosaiselle erityisen merkitt\u00e4v\u00e4n\u00e4 asiana, jota koskevan oikeudenk\u00e4ynnin viiv\u00e4styess\u00e4 hyvityksen yhteism\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4 olisi mainitun lainkohdan p\u00e4\u00e4s\u00e4\u00e4nn\u00f6n mukaan korotettava enint\u00e4\u00e4n 2 000 eurolla.<\/p>\n

Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi, ett\u00e4 arvioitaessa sit\u00e4, oliko oikeudenk\u00e4ynti viiv\u00e4stynyt, oli hyvityslain 4 \u00a7:n mukaan otettava huomioon oikeudenk\u00e4ynnin keston lis\u00e4ksi erityisesti asian laatu ja laajuus, asianosaisten, viranomaisen ja tuomioistuimen toiminta oikeudenk\u00e4ynniss\u00e4 sek\u00e4 asian merkitys asianosaiselle. Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi my\u00f6s, ett\u00e4 puutteellisista resursseista tai muista rakenteellisista seikoista aiheutuvat viiv\u00e4stykset eiv\u00e4t poista asiaa k\u00e4sittelev\u00e4n tahon velvollisuutta k\u00e4sitell\u00e4 asia kohtuullisen ajan kuluessa.<\/p>\n

Asian k\u00e4sittely oli hallinto-oikeudessa kest\u00e4nyt noin kaksi vuotta ja yhdeks\u00e4n kuukautta. A oli toimittanut vaatimuksen oikeudenk\u00e4ynnin viiv\u00e4stymisen hyvitt\u00e4misest\u00e4 hallinto-oikeuteen valituksen oltua vireill\u00e4 noin kaksi vuotta ja kahdeksan kuukautta.<\/p>\n

Asia oli laadultaan ja laajuudeltaan kansainv\u00e4list\u00e4 suojelua koskevassa asiaryhm\u00e4ss\u00e4 tavanomainen eik\u00e4 siihen ollut liittynyt erityisen ongelmalliseksi katsottavia tosiseikkoihin tai oikeudellisiin seikkoihin liittyvi\u00e4 kysymyksi\u00e4. Asian selvitt\u00e4miseksi ei ollut toimitettu suullista k\u00e4sittely\u00e4. Asia oli tullut ulkomaalaislain mukaan k\u00e4sitell\u00e4 kiireellisen\u00e4, eik\u00e4 A ollut omalla toiminnallaan vaikuttanut asian k\u00e4sittelyn viiv\u00e4stymiseen. Kun lis\u00e4ksi otettiin huomioon asian laatu, laajuus ja merkitys A:lle, k\u00e4sittelyaikaa oli pidett\u00e4v\u00e4 kohtuuttoman pitk\u00e4n\u00e4. Korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, ett\u00e4 oikeudenk\u00e4ynti hallinto-oikeudessa oli viiv\u00e4stynyt hallinto-oikeuden vastuulla olevasta syyst\u00e4 hyvityslaissa tarkoitetuin tavoin. Korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, ett\u00e4 A:lle tuli suorittaa hyvityst\u00e4 oikeudenk\u00e4ynnin viiv\u00e4stymisest\u00e4 yhden vuoden ajanjaksoa vastaava m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4 eli 1 500 euroa.<\/p>\n

Korkein hallinto-oikeus lis\u00e4ksi totesi, ett\u00e4 asia oli koskenut A:n oikeudellista asemaa ja ett\u00e4 sit\u00e4 voitiin sen vuoksi pit\u00e4\u00e4 h\u00e4nelle hyvityslain 6:n 2 momentissa tarkoitetulla tavoin erityisen merkitt\u00e4v\u00e4n\u00e4 tavalla, joka mahdollisti hyvityksen yhteism\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4n korottamisen. Ottaen huomioon oikeudenk\u00e4ynnin viiv\u00e4stymisen keston korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, ett\u00e4 edell\u00e4 mainittua hyvityksen yhteism\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4 eli 1 500 euroa voitiin korottaa 500 eurolla. Vaatimus hyl\u00e4ttiin enemm\u00e4lti.<\/p>\n

Suomen perustuslaki 21 \u00a7<\/h3>\n

Euroopan ihmisoikeussopimus 13 artikla<\/h3>\n

Euroopan unionin perusoikeuskirja 47 artikla 1 ja 2 kohta<\/h3>\n

Ulkomaalaislaki 87 \u00a7, 88 \u00a7 ja 193 \u00a7 3 momentti<\/h3>\n

Laki oikeudenk\u00e4ynnin viiv\u00e4stymisen hyvitt\u00e4misest\u00e4 3 \u00a7 1 momentti, 4 \u00a7 1 ja 2 momentti, 5 \u00a7 2 momentti, 6 \u00a7 1 ja 2 momentti sek\u00e4 10 \u00a7<\/p>\n

Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Riitta Mutikainen, Mika Sepp\u00e4l\u00e4, Kari Tornikoski, Tuomas Kuokkanen, Taina Pyysaari, Monica Gullans, Pekka Aalto ja Juha Lavapuro. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Juuso Peltonen.<\/p>\n

hyvityslaki<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade att avg\u00f6ra om behandlingen av den afghanske medborgaren A:s \u00e4rende som g\u00e4llde internationellt skydd enligt 87 \u00a7 och 88 \u00a7 och uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd som beviljas enligt 52 \u00a7 i utl\u00e4nningslagen hade f\u00f6rdr\u00f6jts i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen p\u00e5 ett s\u00e5dant s\u00e4tt att hen hade r\u00e4tt till en sk\u00e4lig gottg\u00f6relse av statens medel enligt 6 \u00a7 i…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[28668],"kji_chamber":[31727],"kji_year":[41198],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[28825,11076,28676,13429,28754],"kji_language":[7746],"class_list":["post-745891","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-administrative-de-finlande","kji_chamber-sommaires","kji_year-41198","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-arende","kji_keyword-enligt","kji_keyword-forvaltningsdomstolen","kji_keyword-gallde","kji_keyword-internationellt","kji_language-multilingue"],"yoast_head":"\nKHO 26.6.2020\/2804 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KHO 26.6.2020\/2804 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade att avg\u00f6ra om behandlingen av den afghanske medborgaren A:s \u00e4rende som g\u00e4llde internationellt skydd enligt 87 \u00a7 och 88 \u00a7 och uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd som beviljas enligt 52 \u00a7 i utl\u00e4nningslagen hade f\u00f6rdr\u00f6jts i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen p\u00e5 ett s\u00e5dant s\u00e4tt att hen hade r\u00e4tt till en sk\u00e4lig gottg\u00f6relse av statens medel enligt 6 \u00a7 i...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\\\/\",\"name\":\"KHO 26.6.2020\\\/2804 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-29T04:13:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KHO 26.6.2020\\\/2804 – Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KHO 26.6.2020\/2804 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"KHO 26.6.2020\/2804 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende","og_description":"H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade att avg\u00f6ra om behandlingen av den afghanske medborgaren A:s \u00e4rende som g\u00e4llde internationellt skydd enligt 87 \u00a7 och 88 \u00a7 och uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd som beviljas enligt 52 \u00a7 i utl\u00e4nningslagen hade f\u00f6rdr\u00f6jts i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen p\u00e5 ett s\u00e5dant s\u00e4tt att hen hade r\u00e4tt till en sk\u00e4lig gottg\u00f6relse av statens medel enligt 6 \u00a7 i...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"5 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\/","name":"KHO 26.6.2020\/2804 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-29T04:13:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-26-6-2020-2804-utlanningsarende\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KHO 26.6.2020\/2804 – Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/745891","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=745891"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=745891"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=745891"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=745891"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=745891"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=745891"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=745891"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=745891"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}