{"id":747512,"date":"2026-04-29T08:02:38","date_gmt":"2026-04-29T06:02:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\/"},"modified":"2026-04-29T08:02:38","modified_gmt":"2026-04-29T06:02:38","slug":"kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\/","title":{"rendered":"KHO 20.5.2020\/2184 &#8212; P\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksun m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4minen"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>X:n kaupunki oli m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4nnyt kahden lapsen perheelle 30.12.2016 asti voimassa olleen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon asiakasmaksuista annetun lain (734\/1992) 7 a \u00a7:n (387\/2008) 2 momentin nojalla korkeimmat mahdolliset p\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksut sen johdosta, ett\u00e4 perheen tuloja ei ollut ilmoitettu. P\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kset olivat tulleet lainvoimaisiksi. Hallinto-oikeus hyv\u00e4ksyi perheen toisen vanhemman tekem\u00e4n perustevalituksen ja palautti asian X:n kaupungille uudelleen k\u00e4sitelt\u00e4v\u00e4ksi ja p\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksujen m\u00e4\u00e4ritt\u00e4miseksi sek\u00e4 liikaa perittyjen maksujen palauttamiseksi. X:n kaupunki oli hallinto-oikeudessa ilmoittanut, ett\u00e4 perheen tulot kysymyksess\u00e4 olevalta ajalta olisivat todenn\u00e4k\u00f6isesti oikeuttaneet maksuttomaan p\u00e4iv\u00e4hoitoon.<\/p>\n<p>Korkein hallinto-oikeus my\u00f6nsi X:n kaupungille asiassa valitusluvan. Valituksessaan X:n kaupunki esitti muun ohella, ett\u00e4 maksut oli m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4tty lain mukaan eik\u00e4 m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4misess\u00e4 ollut tapahtunut virhett\u00e4. Hallintop\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6sten pysyvyyden, hallinnon asiakkaiden yhdenvertaisuuden sek\u00e4 viranomaistoiminnan ennustettavuuden vuoksi s\u00e4\u00e4nn\u00f6ksi\u00e4 ei voitu tulkita hallinto-oikeuden tekem\u00e4ll\u00e4 tavalla.<\/p>\n<p>Korkein hallinto-oikeus pysytti hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen lopputuloksen. Koska asiakas oli laiminly\u00f6nyt toimittaa tulotietonsa X:n kaupungille, kaupunki oli voinut p\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksup\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6st\u00e4 tehdess\u00e4\u00e4n m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4t\u00e4 edell\u00e4 tarkoitetun lainkohdan nojalla maksun korkeimman m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4n mukaisena. T\u00e4st\u00e4 seikasta ei kuitenkaan seurannut, etteik\u00f6 p\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksujen m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4 voinut perustevalituksella saattaa uudelleen arvioitavaksi silloin, kun perustevalituksen k\u00e4sittelyn edellytykset muutoin t\u00e4yttyiv\u00e4t. Perustevalituksena k\u00e4sittelyn esteen\u00e4 ei ollut, ett\u00e4 maksua koskevat p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kset olivat tulleet lainvoimaisiksi.<\/p>\n<h3>L sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon asiakasmaksuista (734\/1992) 7 a \u00a7 (387\/2008) 2 momentti<\/h3>\n<h3>L verojen ja maksujen t\u00e4yt\u00e4nt\u00f6\u00f6npanosta 9 \u00a7<\/h3>\n<p>Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Eija Siitari, Janne Aer, Petri Helander, Antti Pekkala ja Ari Wir\u00e9n. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Kaisa P\u00e4rssinen-Knight.<\/p>\n<p>X stad hade med st\u00f6d av 7 a \u00a7 (387\/2008) 2 mom. i lagen om klientavgifter inom social- och h\u00e4lsov\u00e5rden (734\/1992), som varit i kraft till och med 31.12.2016, f\u00f6r en familj med tv\u00e5 barn fastst\u00e4llt de h\u00f6gsta m\u00f6jliga avgifterna f\u00f6r dagv\u00e5rd eftersom familjens inkomster inte meddelats. Besluten hade vunnit laga kraft. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen godk\u00e4nde de grundbesv\u00e4r familjens ena f\u00f6r\u00e4lder hade gjort och \u00e5terf\u00f6rvisade \u00e4rendet till X stad f\u00f6r ny behandling och fastst\u00e4llande av klientavgiften f\u00f6r dagv\u00e5rden och f\u00f6r \u00e5terbetalning av de f\u00f6r h\u00f6ga avgifter som uttagits. X stad hade i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen meddelat att familjens inkomster under ifr\u00e5gavarande tid sannolikt hade ber\u00e4ttigat till avgiftsfri dagv\u00e5rd.<\/p>\n<p>H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen beviljade X stad besv\u00e4rstillst\u00e5nd i \u00e4rendet. I sina besv\u00e4r framf\u00f6rde X stad bland annat att avgifterna hade fastst\u00e4llts enligt lagen och inget fel hade skett i fastst\u00e4llandet. Med tanke p\u00e5 f\u00f6rvaltningsbeslutens giltighet, j\u00e4mlikheten mellan klienterna inom f\u00f6rvaltningen och myndighetsverksamhetens f\u00f6ruts\u00e4gbarhet kunde best\u00e4mmelserna inte tolkas p\u00e5 det s\u00e4tt som f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen gjort.<\/p>\n<p>H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen \u00e4ndrade inte p\u00e5 slutresultatet i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut. Eftersom klienten hade underl\u00e5tit att meddela sina inkomster \u00e5t X stad, hade staden d\u00e5 den fattade beslut om klientavgiften med st\u00f6d av ovan n\u00e4mnda best\u00e4mmelse kunnat fastst\u00e4lla den enligt den h\u00f6gsta avgiften. Av detta f\u00f6ljde inte att beloppet f\u00f6r klientavgiften f\u00f6r dagv\u00e5rd inte genom grundbesv\u00e4r kunde \u00e5terf\u00f6rvisas f\u00f6r ny pr\u00f6vning i de fall de \u00f6vriga f\u00f6ruts\u00e4ttningarna f\u00f6r att behandla grundbesv\u00e4ren f\u00f6rel\u00e5g. Det att besluten g\u00e4llande avgifterna vunnit laga kraft var inte ett hinder f\u00f6r att behandla grundbesv\u00e4ren.<\/p>\n<p>Lagen om klientavgifter inom social- och h\u00e4lsov\u00e5rden (734\/1992) 7 a \u00a7 (387\/2008) 2 mom.<\/p>\n<h3>Lagen om verkst\u00e4llighet av skatter och avgifter 9 \u00a7<\/h3>\n<p>\u00c4rendet har avgjorts av justitier\u00e5den Eija Siitari, Janne Aer, Petri Helander, Antti Pekkala och Ari Wir\u00e9n. F\u00f6redragande Kaisa P\u00e4rssinen-Knight.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.finlex.fi\/en\/case-law\/supreme-administrative-court\/decision-summary\/2020\/2184\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>X:n kaupunki oli m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4nnyt kahden lapsen perheelle 30.12.2016 asti voimassa olleen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon asiakasmaksuista annetun lain (734\/1992) 7 a \u00a7:n (387\/2008) 2 momentin nojalla korkeimmat mahdolliset p\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksut sen johdosta, ett\u00e4 perheen tuloja ei ollut ilmoitettu. P\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kset olivat tulleet lainvoimaisiksi. Hallinto-oikeus hyv\u00e4ksyi perheen toisen vanhemman tekem\u00e4n perustevalituksen ja palautti asian X:n kaupungille uudelleen k\u00e4sitelt\u00e4v\u00e4ksi&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[28668],"kji_chamber":[31727],"kji_year":[41198],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[43988,43986,43987],"kji_language":[7746],"class_list":["post-747512","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-administrative-de-finlande","kji_chamber-sommaires","kji_year-41198","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-kaupunki","kji_keyword-paivahoidon","kji_keyword-perheen","kji_language-multilingue"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>KHO 20.5.2020\/2184 - P\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksun m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4minen - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KHO 20.5.2020\/2184 - P\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksun m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4minen\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"X:n kaupunki oli m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4nnyt kahden lapsen perheelle 30.12.2016 asti voimassa olleen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon asiakasmaksuista annetun lain (734\/1992) 7 a \u00a7:n (387\/2008) 2 momentin nojalla korkeimmat mahdolliset p\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksut sen johdosta, ett\u00e4 perheen tuloja ei ollut ilmoitettu. P\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kset olivat tulleet lainvoimaisiksi. Hallinto-oikeus hyv\u00e4ksyi perheen toisen vanhemman tekem\u00e4n perustevalituksen ja palautti asian X:n kaupungille uudelleen k\u00e4sitelt\u00e4v\u00e4ksi...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\\\/\",\"name\":\"KHO 20.5.2020\\\/2184 - P\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksun m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4minen - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-29T06:02:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KHO 20.5.2020\\\/2184 &#8211; P\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksun m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4minen\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KHO 20.5.2020\/2184 - P\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksun m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4minen - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"KHO 20.5.2020\/2184 - P\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksun m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4minen","og_description":"X:n kaupunki oli m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4nnyt kahden lapsen perheelle 30.12.2016 asti voimassa olleen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon asiakasmaksuista annetun lain (734\/1992) 7 a \u00a7:n (387\/2008) 2 momentin nojalla korkeimmat mahdolliset p\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksut sen johdosta, ett\u00e4 perheen tuloja ei ollut ilmoitettu. P\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kset olivat tulleet lainvoimaisiksi. Hallinto-oikeus hyv\u00e4ksyi perheen toisen vanhemman tekem\u00e4n perustevalituksen ja palautti asian X:n kaupungille uudelleen k\u00e4sitelt\u00e4v\u00e4ksi...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\/","name":"KHO 20.5.2020\/2184 - P\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksun m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4minen - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-29T06:02:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-20-5-2020-2184-paivahoidon-asiakasmaksun-maaraaminen\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KHO 20.5.2020\/2184 &#8211; P\u00e4iv\u00e4hoidon asiakasmaksun m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4minen"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/747512","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=747512"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=747512"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=747512"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=747512"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=747512"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=747512"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=747512"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=747512"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}