{"id":751177,"date":"2026-04-29T11:48:40","date_gmt":"2026-04-29T09:48:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\/"},"modified":"2026-04-29T11:48:40","modified_gmt":"2026-04-29T09:48:40","slug":"kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\/","title":{"rendered":"KHO 21.2.2020\/753 — Ulkomaalaisasia"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Asiassa oli kysymys siit\u00e4, oliko hallinto-oikeus voinut velvoittaa Maahanmuuttoviraston korvaamaan hallinto-oikeudessa muutoksenhakijana olleen ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n jatko-oleskelulupaa hakeneen hakijan oikeudenk\u00e4yntikulut tilanteessa, jossa hallinto-oikeus oli kumonnut Maahanmuuttoviraston oleskelulupaa koskevan p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen ja ty\u00f6- ja elinkeinotoimiston osap\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen katsottuaan, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6- ja elinkeinotoimisto ei ollut voinut tehd\u00e4 kielteist\u00e4 osap\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6st\u00e4 asiassa.<\/p>\n

Koska valituskelpoisen oleskelulupaa koskevan hallintop\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen oli tehnyt Maahanmuuttovirasto, joka samalla oli my\u00f6s oikeudenk\u00e4ynnin toinen osapuoli, korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, ett\u00e4 Maahanmuuttovirasto oli se hallintoviranomainen, joka oli velvoitettava korvaamaan yksityisen asianosaisen oikeudenk\u00e4yntikulut hallintolaink\u00e4ytt\u00f6lain 74 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 s\u00e4\u00e4dettyjen edellytysten t\u00e4yttyess\u00e4. Asiaa ei ollut arvioitava toisin sen vuoksi, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6- ja elinkeinotoimiston osap\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s sitoi Maahanmuuttovirastoa osap\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksess\u00e4 ratkaistujen seikkojen osalta ja ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6- ja elinkeinotoimisto oli antanut valitusta hallinto-oikeudessa k\u00e4sitelt\u00e4ess\u00e4 oman lausuntonsa.<\/p>\n

Hallintolaink\u00e4ytt\u00f6laki 74 \u00a7 1 ja 2 momentti<\/h3>\n

Ulkomaalaislaki 83 \u00a7 1 ja 2 momentti<\/h3>\n

Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Irma Telivuo, Leena \u00c4\u00e4ril\u00e4, Timo R\u00e4bin\u00e4, Anne Nenonen ja Tero Leskinen. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Jukka Koivusalo.<\/p>\n

Fr\u00e5gan g\u00e4llde om f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade kunnat \u00e5l\u00e4gga Migrationsverket att ers\u00e4tta \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kandens r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngskostnaderna i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen. \u00c4ndringss\u00f6kanden hade ans\u00f6kt om fortsatt uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd som arbetstagare. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade ansett att arbets- och n\u00e4ringsbyr\u00e5n inte kunde ge ett nekande delbeslut i \u00e4rendet och d\u00e4rf\u00f6r upph\u00e4vt Migrationsverkets beslut och arbets- och n\u00e4ringsbyr\u00e5ns delbeslut.<\/p>\n

Migrationsverket var den myndighet som fattat det \u00f6verklagbara beslutet om uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd. Migrationsverket var d\u00e4rmed \u00e4ven r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngens andra part. H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen ans\u00e5g att Migrationsverket var den f\u00f6rvaltningsmyndighet som skulle \u00e5l\u00e4ggas att ers\u00e4tta den enskilda partens r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngskostnader d\u00e5 f\u00f6ruts\u00e4ttningarna f\u00f6r det enligt 74 \u00a7 i f\u00f6rvaltningsprocesslagen uppfylldes. Det att arbets- och n\u00e4ringsbyr\u00e5ns delbeslut var bindande f\u00f6r Migrationsverket avseende de fr\u00e5gor som avgjorts genom delbeslutet, och det att arbets- och n\u00e4ringsbyr\u00e5n hade avgett ett eget utl\u00e5tande till f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen, p\u00e5verkade inte bed\u00f6mningen av \u00e4rendet.<\/p>\n

F\u00f6rvaltningsprocesslagen 74 \u00a7 1 och 2 mom.<\/p>\n

Utl\u00e4nningslagen 83 \u00a7 1 och 2 mom.<\/p>\n

\u00c4rendet har avgjorts av justitier\u00e5den Irma Telivuo, Leena \u00c4\u00e4ril\u00e4, Timo R\u00e4bin\u00e4, Anne Nenonen och Tero Leskinen. F\u00f6redragande Jukka Koivusalo.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Asiassa oli kysymys siit\u00e4, oliko hallinto-oikeus voinut velvoittaa Maahanmuuttoviraston korvaamaan hallinto-oikeudessa muutoksenhakijana olleen ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n jatko-oleskelulupaa hakeneen hakijan oikeudenk\u00e4yntikulut tilanteessa, jossa hallinto-oikeus oli kumonnut Maahanmuuttoviraston oleskelulupaa koskevan p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen ja ty\u00f6- ja elinkeinotoimiston osap\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen katsottuaan, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6- ja elinkeinotoimisto ei ollut voinut tehd\u00e4 kielteist\u00e4 osap\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6st\u00e4 asiassa. Koska valituskelpoisen oleskelulupaa koskevan hallintop\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen oli tehnyt Maahanmuuttovirasto, joka samalla oli…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[28668],"kji_chamber":[31727],"kji_year":[41198],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[11740,35189,31812,44703],"kji_language":[7746],"class_list":["post-751177","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-administrative-de-finlande","kji_chamber-sommaires","kji_year-41198","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-asiassa","kji_keyword-hallinto-oikeus","kji_keyword-maahanmuuttoviraston","kji_keyword-voinut","kji_language-multilingue"],"yoast_head":"\nKHO 21.2.2020\/753 - Ulkomaalaisasia - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KHO 21.2.2020\/753 - Ulkomaalaisasia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Asiassa oli kysymys siit\u00e4, oliko hallinto-oikeus voinut velvoittaa Maahanmuuttoviraston korvaamaan hallinto-oikeudessa muutoksenhakijana olleen ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n jatko-oleskelulupaa hakeneen hakijan oikeudenk\u00e4yntikulut tilanteessa, jossa hallinto-oikeus oli kumonnut Maahanmuuttoviraston oleskelulupaa koskevan p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen ja ty\u00f6- ja elinkeinotoimiston osap\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen katsottuaan, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6- ja elinkeinotoimisto ei ollut voinut tehd\u00e4 kielteist\u00e4 osap\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6st\u00e4 asiassa. Koska valituskelpoisen oleskelulupaa koskevan hallintop\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen oli tehnyt Maahanmuuttovirasto, joka samalla oli...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\\\/\",\"name\":\"KHO 21.2.2020\\\/753 - Ulkomaalaisasia - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-29T09:48:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KHO 21.2.2020\\\/753 – Ulkomaalaisasia\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KHO 21.2.2020\/753 - Ulkomaalaisasia - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"KHO 21.2.2020\/753 - Ulkomaalaisasia","og_description":"Asiassa oli kysymys siit\u00e4, oliko hallinto-oikeus voinut velvoittaa Maahanmuuttoviraston korvaamaan hallinto-oikeudessa muutoksenhakijana olleen ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n jatko-oleskelulupaa hakeneen hakijan oikeudenk\u00e4yntikulut tilanteessa, jossa hallinto-oikeus oli kumonnut Maahanmuuttoviraston oleskelulupaa koskevan p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen ja ty\u00f6- ja elinkeinotoimiston osap\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen katsottuaan, ett\u00e4 ty\u00f6- ja elinkeinotoimisto ei ollut voinut tehd\u00e4 kielteist\u00e4 osap\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6st\u00e4 asiassa. Koska valituskelpoisen oleskelulupaa koskevan hallintop\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen oli tehnyt Maahanmuuttovirasto, joka samalla oli...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"2 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\/","name":"KHO 21.2.2020\/753 - Ulkomaalaisasia - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-29T09:48:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-21-2-2020-753-ulkomaalaisasia\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KHO 21.2.2020\/753 – Ulkomaalaisasia"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/751177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=751177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=751177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=751177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=751177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=751177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=751177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=751177"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=751177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}