{"id":756785,"date":"2026-04-29T16:09:42","date_gmt":"2026-04-29T14:09:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\/"},"modified":"2026-04-29T16:09:45","modified_gmt":"2026-04-29T14:09:45","slug":"cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation, 21 novembre 2019, n\u00b0 2018-00104"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

N\u00b0 155 \/ 2019 du 21.11.2019. Num\u00e9ro CAS -2018-00104 du registre.<\/p>\n

Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt et un novembre deux mille dix-neuf.<\/p>\n

Composition:<\/p>\n

Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Carlo HEYARD, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Eliane EICHER, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Michel REIFFERS, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Marie- Jeanne KAPPWEILER, premier avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n

Entre:<\/p>\n

X, demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n

demandeur en cassation,<\/p>\n

comparant par Ma\u00eetre Aur\u00e9lia FELTZ, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, en l\u2019\u00e9tude de laquelle domicile est \u00e9lu,<\/p>\n

et:<\/p>\n

Y, demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n

d\u00e9fenderesse en cassation.<\/p>\n

Vu l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, num\u00e9ro 114\/18, rendu le 20 juin 2018 sous le num\u00e9ro 44777 du r\u00f4le par la Cour d\u2019appel du Grand-Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, premi\u00e8re chambre, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8re civile ;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en cassation signifi\u00e9 le 14 novembre 2018 par X \u00e0 Y, d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le 16 novembre 2018 au greffe de la Cour ;<\/p>\n

2 Sur le rapport du conseiller Carlo HEYARD et les conclusions du pr emier avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Serge WAGNER ;<\/p>\n

Sur les faits :<\/p>\n

Dans le cadre d\u2019un litige relatif au partage, apr\u00e8s divorce, de la communaut\u00e9 de biens existant entre Y et X, le tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg avait d\u00e9clar\u00e9 non fond\u00e9e la demande d\u2019Y en paiement de r\u00e9compenses . La Cour d\u2019appel a, par r\u00e9formation, d\u00e9clar\u00e9 cette demande fond\u00e9e.<\/p>\n

Sur l\u2019unique moyen de cassation :<\/p>\n

\u00ab tir\u00e9<\/p>\n

1. de l'absence de motivation de l'arr\u00eat quant \u00e0 l'application de l\u2019 article 1433 du Code civil, respectivement de l'article 89 de la constitution luxembourgeoise et de l'article 249 du N ouveau Code de proc\u00e9dure civile,<\/p>\n

2. de la violation, sinon de la fausse application, sinon du refus de l'application stricte des articles 1433 et 1469 du Code civil,<\/p>\n

en ce que la Cour d'appel a — en r\u00e9formant les premiers juges — d\u00e9clar\u00e9 les demandes en r\u00e9compense fond\u00e9es,<\/p>\n

aux motifs que << il serait [en effet] illogique, alors que l'article 1433 du Code civil pose le principe d'un droit \u00e0 r\u00e9compense, que l'interpr\u00e9tation stricte de l'article 1469 alin\u00e9a 1 er du Code civil disposant que la r\u00e9compense est en principe \u00e9gale \u00e0 la plus faible des deux sommes que repr\u00e9sente la d\u00e9pense faite et le profit subsistant, le r\u00e9duise \u00e0 n\u00e9ant >> et que << X ne rapporte pas la preuve que la communaut\u00e9 n'en a pas tir\u00e9 profit, mais confirme au contraire que les fonds ont \u00e9t\u00e9 utilis\u00e9s pour subvenir aux d\u00e9penses du m\u00e9nage >> ainsi qu' << \u00e0 [d\u00e9faut de] preuve contraire, Y a partant droit \u00e0 r\u00e9compense >>,<\/p>\n

alors que par principe, face \u00e0 un texte clair, le juge ne peut ni ajouter des dispositions que la loi ne contient pas, ni raisonner par analogie anachronique, qu'en se fondant pour caract\u00e9riser le droit de r\u00e9compense de l'article 1433 du Code civil, sur les r\u00e8gles de calcul de l'article 1469 du Code civil, ce dernier ne d\u00e9coulant que de l'application certaine de la caract\u00e9risation du droit \u00e0 r\u00e9compense, la Cour d'appel n'a pas donn\u00e9 de base l\u00e9gale \u00e0 sa d\u00e9cision ;<\/p>\n

de telle sorte qu'en statuant comme elle l'a fait, la Cour d'appel a viol\u00e9 l'article 89 de la constitution luxembourgeoise, l'article 249 du Nouveau code de proc\u00e9dure civile et les articles 1433 et 1469 du Code civil, sinon en a fait une mauvaise application, sinon une mauvaise interpr\u00e9tation. \u00bb.<\/p>\n

Aux termes de l\u2019article 10, alin\u00e9a 2, de la loi modifi\u00e9e du 18 f\u00e9vrier 1885 sur les pourvois et la proc\u00e9dure en cassation, un moyen ou un \u00e9l\u00e9ment de moyen ne doit, sous peine d\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9, mettre en \u0153uvre qu\u2019un seul cas d\u2019ouverture.<\/p>\n

Le moyen articule la violation de s articles 89 de la Constitution et 249 du Nouveau code de proc\u00e9dure civile, partant le d\u00e9faut de motifs, la violation des articles 1433 et 1469 du Code civil et le d\u00e9faut de base l\u00e9gale, donc trois cas d\u2019ouverture distincts.<\/p>\n

Il en suit que le moyen est irrecevable.<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS,<\/p>\n

la Cour de cassation :<\/p>\n

rejette le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n

condamne le demandeur en cassation aux d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance en cassation.<\/p>\n

La lecture du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite en la susdite audience publique par le pr\u00e9sident Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, en pr\u00e9sence du premier avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Marie-Jeanne KAPPWEILER et du greffier Viviane PROBST.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

N\u00b0 155 \/ 2019 du 21.11.2019. Num\u00e9ro CAS -2018-00104 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt et un novembre deux mille dix-neuf. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[8423],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[45029],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,8576],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-756785","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-de-cassation","kji_year-45029","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-novembre","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation, 21 novembre 2019, n\u00b0 2018-00104 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation, 21 novembre 2019, n\u00b0 2018-00104\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"N\u00b0 155 \/ 2019 du 21.11.2019. Num\u00e9ro CAS -2018-00104 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt et un novembre deux mille dix-neuf. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-29T14:09:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 21 novembre 2019, n\u00b0 2018-00104 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-29T14:09:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-29T14:09:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 21 novembre 2019, n\u00b0 2018-00104\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation, 21 novembre 2019, n\u00b0 2018-00104 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation, 21 novembre 2019, n\u00b0 2018-00104","og_description":"N\u00b0 155 \/ 2019 du 21.11.2019. Num\u00e9ro CAS -2018-00104 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt et un novembre deux mille dix-neuf. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-04-29T14:09:45+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"4 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\/","name":"Cour de cassation, 21 novembre 2019, n\u00b0 2018-00104 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-29T14:09:42+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-29T14:09:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-21-novembre-2019-n-2018-00104\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation, 21 novembre 2019, n\u00b0 2018-00104"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/756785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=756785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=756785"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=756785"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=756785"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=756785"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=756785"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=756785"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=756785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}