{"id":761751,"date":"2026-04-29T20:35:42","date_gmt":"2026-04-29T18:35:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\/"},"modified":"2026-04-29T20:35:42","modified_gmt":"2026-04-29T18:35:42","slug":"kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\/","title":{"rendered":"KHO 30.8.2019\/3885 — Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

\u00c4ndringss\u00f6kanden hade i sin ans\u00f6kan om internationellt skydd meddelat att han avfallit fr\u00e5n islam och omv\u00e4nt sig till kristendomen. Migrationsverket, som hade avslagit \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kandens ans\u00f6kan, hade h\u00f6rt \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden muntligt i asylintervjun. \u00c4ndringss\u00f6kanden hade inte i sina besv\u00e4r till f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen explicit yrkat p\u00e5 muntlig f\u00f6rhandling. Fr\u00e5gan g\u00e4llde om f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen under dessa omst\u00e4ndigheter hade kunnat avsl\u00e5 besv\u00e4ren utan att p\u00e5 tj\u00e4nstens v\u00e4gnar h\u00e5lla muntlig f\u00f6rhandling enligt 37 \u00a7 1 i f\u00f6rvaltningsprocesslagen eller utan att tillfr\u00e5ga \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden om han \u00f6nskar att i \u00e4rendet h\u00e5lls en muntlig f\u00f6rhandling.<\/p>\n

H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade att domstolens skyldighet att utreda \u00e4rendet i enlighet med 33 \u00a7 i f\u00f6rvaltningsprocesslagen i ett enskilt \u00e4rende ska bed\u00f6mas utg\u00e5ende fr\u00e5n \u00e4rendets natur. I \u00e4renden som g\u00e4ller internationellt skydd, d\u00e4r s\u00f6kanden \u00e5beropar ett sk\u00e4l som p\u00e5 objektiva grunder kan anses orsaka f\u00f6rf\u00f6ljelse eller risk f\u00f6r allvarlig skada, har \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden ett markerat behov av r\u00e4ttsskydd. Det h\u00e4r p\u00e5verkar ocks\u00e5 domstolens skyldighet att utreda \u00e4rendet och d\u00e4rigenom bed\u00f6mningen av behovet av en muntlig f\u00f6rhandling \u00e4ven d\u00e5 muntlig f\u00f6rhandling inte explicit har yrkats. I bed\u00f6mningen av om muntlig f\u00f6rhandling ska h\u00e5llas p\u00e5 tj\u00e4nstens v\u00e4gnar ska ocks\u00e5 beaktas att \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden b\u00f6r ha en m\u00f6jlighet att neka till muntlig f\u00f6rhandling. Ett nekande kan ges betydelse vid bed\u00f6mningen av \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kandens trov\u00e4rdighet.<\/p>\n

Med h\u00e4nvisning till ovan n\u00e4mnda och med beaktande av \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kandens processuella r\u00e4ttigheter och den synnerligen l\u00e5nga tid som g\u00e5tt sedan Migrationsverkets asylintervju hade bed\u00f6mningen av den i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen framf\u00f6rda skyddsgrunden f\u00f6rutsatt att f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen tillfr\u00e5gade \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden om denne \u00f6nskar att en muntlig f\u00f6rhandling h\u00e5lls i \u00e4rendet. Eftersom r\u00e4ttspraxis g\u00e4llande n\u00e4r ett yrkande om muntlig f\u00f6rhandling ska framst\u00e4llas, och ifall inget yrkande har framf\u00f6rts om behovet av att p\u00e5 tj\u00e4nstens v\u00e4gnar tillfr\u00e5ga \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden, inte \u00e4nnu var stadgad, kunde \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kandens i h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen framst\u00e4llda yrkande om muntlig f\u00f6rhandling inte avsl\u00e5s. H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen upph\u00e4vde f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut och \u00e5ters\u00e4nde \u00e4rendet till f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen f\u00f6r att h\u00e5lla muntlig f\u00f6rhandling enligt \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kandens yrkande och f\u00f6r att d\u00e4refter avg\u00f6ras p\u00e5 nytt.<\/p>\n

F\u00f6rvaltningsprocesslagen 33 \u00a7 och 37 \u00a7 1 mom.<\/p>\n

Jmfr. HFD 2018:130<\/p>\n

\u00c4rendet har avgjorts av justitier\u00e5den Riitta Mutikainen, Hannu Ranta, Kari Tornikoski, Tuomas Kuokkanen och Jaakko Autio. F\u00f6redragande Elina Nyholm.<\/p>\n

Valittaja oli kansainv\u00e4list\u00e4 suojelua koskevassa hakemuksessaan ilmoittanut luopuneensa islamin uskosta ja k\u00e4\u00e4ntyneens\u00e4 kristinuskoon. Maahanmuuttovirasto, joka oli hyl\u00e4nnyt valittajan hakemuksen, oli kuullut valittajaa suullisesti turvapaikkapuhuttelussa. Valittaja ei ollut valituksessaan hallinto-oikeudelle nimenomaisesti pyyt\u00e4nyt, ett\u00e4 asiassa on toimitettava suullinen k\u00e4sittely. Asiassa oli otettava kantaa siihen, oliko hallinto-oikeus voinut t\u00e4ss\u00e4 tilanteessa hyl\u00e4t\u00e4 valittajan valituksen toimittamatta viran puolesta hallintolaink\u00e4ytt\u00f6lain 37 \u00a7:n 1 momentin nojalla suullista k\u00e4sittely\u00e4 tai tiedustelematta valittajalta, haluaako h\u00e4n, ett\u00e4 asiassa toimitetaan suullinen k\u00e4sittely.<\/p>\n

Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi, ett\u00e4 hallintolaink\u00e4ytt\u00f6lain 33 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 s\u00e4\u00e4detty\u00e4 tuomioistuimen selvitt\u00e4misvelvollisuutta yksitt\u00e4istapauksessa on arvioitava erityisesti k\u00e4sitelt\u00e4v\u00e4n\u00e4 olevan asian laadun perusteella. Kansainv\u00e4list\u00e4 suojelua koskevissa asioissa, joissa vedotaan seikkaan, joka objektiivisesti arvioiden saattaa aiheuttaa vainon tai vakavan haitan vaaraa, valittajan oikeussuojan tarve on korostunut. T\u00e4m\u00e4 vaikuttaa my\u00f6s tuomioistuimen selvitt\u00e4misvelvollisuuteen ja siten suullisen k\u00e4sittelyn toimittamisen tarpeen arviointiin my\u00f6s siin\u00e4 tilanteessa, ett\u00e4 suullista k\u00e4sittely\u00e4 ei ole nimenomaisesti vaadittu. Suullisen k\u00e4sittelyn toimittamista viran puolesta harkittaessa on my\u00f6s otettava huomioon, ett\u00e4 valittajalla on oltava mahdollisuus kielt\u00e4yty\u00e4 suullisesta k\u00e4sittelyst\u00e4. Suullisesta k\u00e4sittelyst\u00e4 kielt\u00e4ytymiselle voidaan antaa painoarvoa valittajan uskottavuuden arvioinnissa.<\/p>\n

Edell\u00e4 lausutun perusteella ja kun otettiin huomioon valittajan menettelylliset oikeudet sek\u00e4 varsin pitk\u00e4n ajan kuluminen Maahanmuuttoviraston turvapaikkapuhuttelusta, hallinto-oikeudessa esitetyn turvapaikkaperusteen arviointi olisi edellytt\u00e4nyt, ett\u00e4 hallinto-oikeus olisi viran puolesta tiedustellut valittajalta, haluaako h\u00e4n suullisen k\u00e4sittelyn toimittamista asiassaan. Koska oikeusk\u00e4yt\u00e4nt\u00f6 suullisen k\u00e4sittelyn vaatimisen ajankohdasta ja vaatimuksen puuttuessa asian tiedustelemisesta viran puolesta ei ollut viel\u00e4 vakiintunut, valittajan vasta korkeimmassa hallinto-oikeudessa esitt\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4 suullisen k\u00e4sittelyn vaatimusta ei voitu hyl\u00e4t\u00e4. Korkein hallinto-oikeus kumosi hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen ja palautti asian hallinto-oikeudelle valittajan vaatiman suullisen k\u00e4sittelyn toimittamiseksi ja sen j\u00e4lkeen uudelleen ratkaistavaksi.<\/p>\n

Hallintolaink\u00e4ytt\u00f6laki 33 \u00a7 ja 37 \u00a7 1 momentti<\/h3>\n

Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Riitta Mutikainen, Hannu Ranta, Kari Tornikoski, Tuomas Kuokkanen ja Jaakko Autio. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Elina Nyholm.<\/p>\n

Vrt. KHO 2018:130<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00c4ndringss\u00f6kanden hade i sin ans\u00f6kan om internationellt skydd meddelat att han avfallit fr\u00e5n islam och omv\u00e4nt sig till kristendomen. Migrationsverket, som hade avslagit \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kandens ans\u00f6kan, hade h\u00f6rt \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden muntligt i asylintervjun. \u00c4ndringss\u00f6kanden hade inte i sina besv\u00e4r till f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen explicit yrkat p\u00e5 muntlig f\u00f6rhandling. Fr\u00e5gan g\u00e4llde om f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen under dessa omst\u00e4ndigheter hade kunnat avsl\u00e5 besv\u00e4ren…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[28668],"kji_chamber":[31727],"kji_year":[45029],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[28755,19363,43831,28676,40722],"kji_language":[7746],"class_list":["post-761751","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-administrative-de-finlande","kji_chamber-sommaires","kji_year-45029","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-andringssokanden","kji_keyword-ansokan","kji_keyword-forhandling","kji_keyword-forvaltningsdomstolen","kji_keyword-muntlig","kji_language-multilingue"],"yoast_head":"\nKHO 30.8.2019\/3885 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KHO 30.8.2019\/3885 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u00c4ndringss\u00f6kanden hade i sin ans\u00f6kan om internationellt skydd meddelat att han avfallit fr\u00e5n islam och omv\u00e4nt sig till kristendomen. Migrationsverket, som hade avslagit \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kandens ans\u00f6kan, hade h\u00f6rt \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden muntligt i asylintervjun. \u00c4ndringss\u00f6kanden hade inte i sina besv\u00e4r till f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen explicit yrkat p\u00e5 muntlig f\u00f6rhandling. Fr\u00e5gan g\u00e4llde om f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen under dessa omst\u00e4ndigheter hade kunnat avsl\u00e5 besv\u00e4ren...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\\\/\",\"name\":\"KHO 30.8.2019\\\/3885 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-29T18:35:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KHO 30.8.2019\\\/3885 – Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KHO 30.8.2019\/3885 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"KHO 30.8.2019\/3885 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende","og_description":"\u00c4ndringss\u00f6kanden hade i sin ans\u00f6kan om internationellt skydd meddelat att han avfallit fr\u00e5n islam och omv\u00e4nt sig till kristendomen. Migrationsverket, som hade avslagit \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kandens ans\u00f6kan, hade h\u00f6rt \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden muntligt i asylintervjun. \u00c4ndringss\u00f6kanden hade inte i sina besv\u00e4r till f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen explicit yrkat p\u00e5 muntlig f\u00f6rhandling. Fr\u00e5gan g\u00e4llde om f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen under dessa omst\u00e4ndigheter hade kunnat avsl\u00e5 besv\u00e4ren...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"4 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\/","name":"KHO 30.8.2019\/3885 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-29T18:35:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-30-8-2019-3885-utlanningsarende\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KHO 30.8.2019\/3885 – Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/761751","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=761751"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=761751"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=761751"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=761751"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=761751"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=761751"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=761751"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=761751"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}