{"id":769662,"date":"2026-04-30T02:48:36","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T00:48:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\/"},"modified":"2026-04-30T02:48:40","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T00:48:40","slug":"cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation, 28 mars 2019, n\u00b0 0328-4087"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

N\u00b0 50 \/ 2019 du 28.03.2019. Num\u00e9ro 4087 du registre.<\/p>\n

Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-huit mars deux mille dix -neuf.<\/p>\n

Composition:<\/p>\n

Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Carlo HEYARD, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Eliane EICHER, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Michel REIFFERS, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Serge WAGNER, premier avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n

Entre:<\/p>\n

la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme SOC1) , \u00e9tablie et ayant son si\u00e8ge social \u00e0 (\u2026), repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son conseil d\u2019administration, inscrite au registre de commerce et des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s sous le num\u00e9ro (\u2026),<\/p>\n

demanderesse en cassation,<\/p>\n

comparant par Ma\u00eetre Michel SCHWARTZ, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu,<\/p>\n

et:<\/p>\n

1) A) et son \u00e9pouse<\/p>\n

2) B), les deux demeurant ensemble \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n

d\u00e9fendeurs en cassation,<\/p>\n

comparant par Ma\u00eetre Annick WURTH, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, en l\u2019\u00e9tude de laquelle domicile est \u00e9lu,<\/p>\n

3) la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de droit allemand Soc2) , \u00e9tablie et ayant son si\u00e8ge social \u00e0 (\u2026), inscrite au registre de l\u2019Amtsgericht Saarbr\u00fccken sous le num\u00e9ro (\u2026.) , d\u00e9clar\u00e9e en \u00e9tat de faillite par jugement rendu le (\u2026) par l\u2019Amtsgericht Saarbr\u00fccken, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son curateur, Rechtsanwalt C) , demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n

d\u00e9fenderesse en cassation,<\/p>\n

comparant par Ma\u00eetre Claude COLLARINI, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu,<\/p>\n

4) la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme SOC3) , \u00e9tablie et ayant son si\u00e8ge social \u00e0 (\u2026), repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son conseil d\u2019administration, inscrite au registre de commerce et des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s sous le num\u00e9ro (\u2026),<\/p>\n

d\u00e9fenderes se en cassation,<\/p>\n

comparant par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme SCHILTZ & SCHILTZ, inscrite \u00e0 la liste V du tableau de l\u2019Ordre des avocats du barreau de Luxembourg, en l\u2019\u00e9tude de laquelle domicile est \u00e9lu, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e aux fins de la pr\u00e9sente instance par Ma\u00eetre Franz SCHILTZ, avocat \u00e0 la Cour,<\/p>\n

5) la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e Soc 4), \u00e9tablie et ayant son si\u00e8ge social \u00e0 (\u2026), repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son g\u00e9rant, inscrite au registre de commerce et des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s sous le num\u00e9ro (\u2026),<\/p>\n

6) la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme Soc5) , \u00e9tablie et ayant son si\u00e8ge social \u00e0 (\u2026), repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son conseil d\u2019administration, inscrite au registre de commerce et des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s sous le num\u00e9ro (\u2026),<\/p>\n

d\u00e9fenderesses en cassation.<\/p>\n

——————————————————————————————————<\/p>\n

LA COUR DE CASSATION :<\/p>\n

Vu l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, num\u00e9ro 159\/1 7, rendu le 8 novembre 2017 sous les num\u00e9ros 42469, 42551 et 42563 du r\u00f4le par la Cour d\u2019appel du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, quatr i\u00e8me chambre, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8re c ommerciale ;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en cassation signifi\u00e9 le 12 mars 2018 par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme SOC1) (ci-apr\u00e8s \u00ab la compagnie d\u2019assurances SOC1) \u00bb) \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de droit allemand Soc2) (ci-apr\u00e8s \u00ab la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC2) \u00bb), \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e Soc4) (ci-apr\u00e8s \u00ab la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC4) \u00bb), \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme SOC3) (ci-apr\u00e8s \u00ab la compagnie d\u2019assurances SOC3)\u00bb) et \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme Soc5) (ci-apr\u00e8s \u00ab la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC5) \u00bb) et le 14 mars 2018 \u00e0 A) et \u00e0 B), d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le 21 mars 2018 au greffe de la Cour ;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse notifi\u00e9 le 26 avril 2018 par la compagnie d\u2019assurances SOC3) \u00e0 la compagnie d\u2019assurances SOC1), \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC2) , \u00e0 A), \u00e0 B), \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC4) et \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC5) , d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le 27 avril 2018 au greffe de la Cour ;<\/p>\n

3 Vu le m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse signifi\u00e9 le 25 avril 2018 par A) et B) \u00e0 la compagnie d\u2019assurances SOC1) et le 9 mai 2018 \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC2) , \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC4), \u00e0 la compagnie d\u2019assurances SOC3)et \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC5) , d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le 11 mai 2018 au greffe de la Cour ;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse signifi\u00e9 le 11 mai 2018 par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC2 ) \u00e0 la compagnie d\u2019assurances SOC1), d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le 14 mai 2018 au greffe de la Cour ;<\/p>\n

Sur le rapport du conseiller Carlo HEYARD et sur les conclusions de l\u2019avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Sandra KERSCH ;<\/p>\n

Sur la recevabilit\u00e9 du pourvoi qui est contest\u00e9e :<\/p>\n

Attendu, selon l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, que suite \u00e0 l\u2019apparition de d\u00e9sordres lors de travaux de forage ex\u00e9cut\u00e9s par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC2) pour le compte de A) et de son \u00e9pouse B), ces derniers avaient recherch\u00e9 la responsabilit\u00e9 civile de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC2) et avaient exerc\u00e9 l\u2019action directe contre la compagnie d\u2019assurances SOC1) , assureur de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC2) ; que le tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg avait condamn\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC2) et la compagnie d\u2019assurances SOC1) in solidum au paiement de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats ; que la Cour d\u2019appel a confirm\u00e9 le jugement de premi\u00e8re instance ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que les \u00e9poux A) -B) concluent \u00e0 l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 du pourvoi au motif que la compagnie d\u2019assurances SOC1) aurait acquiesc\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019arr\u00eat en leur payant, sans r\u00e9serves, les dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats et les frais auxquels elle avait \u00e9t\u00e9 condamn\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019il n\u2019est pas contest\u00e9 qu\u2019apr\u00e8s le prononc\u00e9 de l\u2019arr\u00eat, le 8 novembre 2017, les \u00e9poux A) -B) ont re\u00e7u, l e 22 novembre 2017, de la compagnie d\u2019assurances SOC1) paiement du montant de la condamnation ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que le pourvoi en cassation n\u2019\u00e9tant pas suspensif en mati\u00e8re civile, l\u2019ex\u00e9cution, m\u00eame sans r\u00e9serves, d\u2019un arr\u00eat ne vaut acquiescement que s\u2019il r\u00e9sulte des circonstances dans lesquelles elle a eu lieu que celui qui a ex\u00e9cut\u00e9 a, sans \u00e9quivoque, manifest\u00e9 sa volont\u00e9 d\u2019acquiescer ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019en l\u2019occurrence, l\u2019ex\u00e9cution spontan\u00e9e de l\u2019arr\u00eat, hors de toute demande aff\u00e9rente des parties gagnantes, dans un bref d\u00e9lai apr\u00e8s que l\u2019arr\u00eat avait \u00e9t\u00e9 rendu, \u00e9tablit, \u00e0 l\u2019abri de tout doute, l\u2019 intention de la compagnie d\u2019assurances SOC1) de mettre d\u00e9finitivement fin au litige ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que la compagnie d\u2019assurances SOC1) ayant ainsi acquiesc\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019arr\u00eat d\u2019appel, celui-ci est devenu irr\u00e9vocable ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il en suit que le pourvoi en cassation est irrecevable ;<\/p>\n

Sur la demande en allocation d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure :<\/p>\n

4 Attendu que la demanderesse en cassation \u00e9tant \u00e0 condamner aux d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance en cassation, sa demande en allocation d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure est \u00e0 rejeter ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019il serait in\u00e9quitable de laisser \u00e0 charge des \u00e9poux A) -B), d\u00e9fendeurs en cassation, l\u2019int\u00e9gralit\u00e9 des frais expos\u00e9s non compris dans les d\u00e9pens ; qu\u2019il convient de leur allouer une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 2.500 euros ;<\/p>\n

Par ces motifs,<\/p>\n

d\u00e9clare le pourvoi irrecevable ;<\/p>\n

rejette la demande de la demanderesse en cassation en obtention d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure ;<\/p>\n

condamne la demanderesse en cassation \u00e0 payer \u00e0 A) et B) une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 2.500 euros ;<\/p>\n

condamne la demanderesse en cassation aux d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance en cassation avec distraction au profit de Ma\u00eetre Claude COLLARINI et de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme SCHILTZ & SCHILTZ, sur leurs affirmations de droit.<\/p>\n

La lecture du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite en la susdite audience publique par Monsieur le pr\u00e9sident Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, en pr\u00e9sence de Monsieur Serge WAGNER, premier avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, et de Madame Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

N\u00b0 50 \/ 2019 du 28.03.2019. Num\u00e9ro 4087 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-huit mars deux mille dix -neuf. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation,\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[8423],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[45029],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-769662","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-de-cassation","kji_year-45029","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation, 28 mars 2019, n\u00b0 0328-4087 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation, 28 mars 2019, n\u00b0 0328-4087\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"N\u00b0 50 \/ 2019 du 28.03.2019. Num\u00e9ro 4087 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-huit mars deux mille dix -neuf. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation,\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-30T00:48:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"6 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 28 mars 2019, n\u00b0 0328-4087 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T00:48:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-30T00:48:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 28 mars 2019, n\u00b0 0328-4087\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation, 28 mars 2019, n\u00b0 0328-4087 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation, 28 mars 2019, n\u00b0 0328-4087","og_description":"N\u00b0 50 \/ 2019 du 28.03.2019. Num\u00e9ro 4087 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-huit mars deux mille dix -neuf. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation,\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-04-30T00:48:40+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"6 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\/","name":"Cour de cassation, 28 mars 2019, n\u00b0 0328-4087 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T00:48:36+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-30T00:48:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-mars-2019-n-0328-4087-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation, 28 mars 2019, n\u00b0 0328-4087"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/769662","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=769662"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=769662"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=769662"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=769662"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=769662"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=769662"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=769662"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=769662"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}