{"id":776859,"date":"2026-04-30T09:27:24","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T07:27:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\/"},"modified":"2026-04-30T09:27:28","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T07:27:28","slug":"tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal d&#8217;arrondissement, 13 d\u00e9cembre 2018"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Jugt no 3240\/2 018<\/p>\n<p>Notice no 2178\/17\/CD<\/p>\n<p>\/<\/p>\n<p>J U G E M E N T S U R I N C I D E N T<\/p>\n<p>AUDIENCE PUBLIQUE DU 13 DECEMBRE 201 8<\/p>\n<p>Le Tribunal d&#039;arrondissement de et \u00e0 Luxembourg, chambre correctionnelle, a rendu le jugement qui suit:<\/p>\n<p>dans la cause du Minist\u00e8re Public contre<\/p>\n<p>P.1.) n\u00e9 le (\u2026) \u00e0 (\u2026) (Italie) &#8212; actuellement d\u00e9tenu \u2013<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; p r \u00e9 v e n u &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>F A I T S :<\/p>\n<p>Par citation du 24 septembre 2018, le Procureur d&#039;Etat pr\u00e8s le Tribunal d&#039;arrondissement de Luxembourg a requis le pr\u00e9venu de compara\u00eetre \u00e0 l&#039;audience publique des 17 et 18 octobre 2018 devant le Tribunal correctionnel de ce si\u00e8ge, pour y entendre statuer sur les pr\u00e9ventions suivantes:<\/p>\n<p>faux et usage de faux ; abus de faiblesse ; escroqueries ; abus de confiance ; blanchiment.<\/p>\n<p>En date du 17 octobre 2018, l&#039;affaire fut remise contradictoirement et reparut utilement \u00e0 l&#039;audience publique du 10 d\u00e9cembre 2018 .<\/p>\n<p>A cette audience, le vice-pr\u00e9sident constata l&#039;identit\u00e9 du pr\u00e9venu, lui donna connaissance de l\u2019acte qui a saisi le Tribunal et l\u2019informa de son droit de se taire et de son droit de ne pas s\u2019incriminer soi-m\u00eame.<\/p>\n<p>2 Ma\u00eetre Roby SCHONS, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg, souleva in limine litis une nullit\u00e9. Il exposa plus amplement son moyen.<\/p>\n<p>Le repr\u00e9sentant du Minist\u00e8re Public, Felix WANTZ , substitut du Procureur d\u2019Etat, fut entendu en ses conclusions.<\/p>\n<p>Le Tribunal prit l\u2019incident en d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 et rendit \u00e0 l&#039;audience de ce jour, date \u00e0 laquelle le prononc\u00e9 avait \u00e9t\u00e9 fix\u00e9, le<\/p>\n<p>J U G E M E N T qui suit:<\/p>\n<p>Vu la citation \u00e0 pr\u00e9venu du 24 septembre 2018 (not. 2178\/17\/ CD) r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement notifi\u00e9e au pr\u00e9venu.<\/p>\n<p>Vu l&#039;ordonnance de renvoi num\u00e9ro 429\/18 rendue par la chambre du conseil du Tribunal d&#039;arrondissement de et \u00e0 Luxembourg en date du 13 juillet 2018.<\/p>\n<p>A l\u2019audience publique du 10 d\u00e9cembre 2018 Ma\u00eetre Roby SCHONS, mandataire d\u2019P.1.), soul\u00e8ve in limine litis la nullit\u00e9 de l\u2019interrogatoire de premi\u00e8re comparution et verse une note de plaidoiries y relative. Il affirme qu\u2019P.1.) n\u2019aurait pas \u00e9t\u00e9 inculp\u00e9 en bonne et due forme par le juge d\u2019instruction lors du premier interrogatoire. Cette absence d\u2019inculpation constituerait une nullit\u00e9 d\u2019ordre public relative aux droits de la d\u00e9fense de son mandant, de sorte qu\u2019il serait encore en droit de la soulever en tout \u00e9tat de cause, et donc \u00e9galement devant la juridiction de jugement.<\/p>\n<p>Le repr\u00e9sentant du Minist\u00e8re Public estime qu\u2019P.1.) est forclos \u00e0 soulever cette nullit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Le code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale r\u00e8gle express\u00e9ment le r\u00e9gime des nullit\u00e9s des actes accomplis au cours de l\u2019instruction pr\u00e9paratoire, son article 126 pr\u00e9voyant que la nullit\u00e9 de ces actes doit \u00eatre demand\u00e9e au cours m\u00eame de l\u2019instruction et ce devant la chambre du conseil du Tribunal d\u2019Arrondissement dans un d\u00e9lai de forclusion de 5 jours \u00e0 partir de la connaissance de l\u2019acte.<\/p>\n<p>Par r\u00e9quisitoire introductif du Procureur d\u2019Etat du 20 janvier 2017, une instruction a \u00e9t\u00e9 ouverte contre le pr\u00e9venu.<\/p>\n<p>Lors de la premi\u00e8re comparution devant le juge d\u2019instruction en date du 3 mars 2017, le pr\u00e9venu P.1.) , en pr\u00e9sence de son avocat, a \u00e9t\u00e9 formellement inform\u00e9 sur les faits qui lui sont imput\u00e9s et les actes accomplis.<\/p>\n<p>Une lecture minutieuse du proc\u00e8s-verbal de premi\u00e8re comparution r\u00e9v\u00e8le que le pr\u00e9venu a \u00e9t\u00e9 formellement inculp\u00e9 par le juge d\u2019instrucion. Il est ainsi act\u00e9 en page 2 \u00a75 :<\/p>\n<p>3 \u00ab Veuillez noter que vous \u00eates formellement inculp\u00e9 du chef d\u2019abus de faiblesse (art.493 C.P.), escroquerie (art. 496 C.P.) et blanchiment (art. 506- 1 C.P.) (communication t\u00e9l\u00e9phonique du Minist\u00e8re Public du 20 janvier 2017 et r\u00e9quisitoires additionnels des 17 f\u00e9vrier 2017 et 3 mars 2017). \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019instruction a \u00e9t\u00e9 cl\u00f4tur\u00e9e en date du 29 mai 2018.<\/p>\n<p>S\u2019agissant d\u2019un grief du pr\u00e9venu relatif au manquement de l\u2019instruction comme visant la nullit\u00e9 d\u2019un acte pos\u00e9 par le juge d\u2019instruction, le pr\u00e9venu est forclos \u00e0 le soulever, d\u00e8s lors que sont soumises au d\u00e9lai de forclusion de l\u2019articles 126 (3) du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale toutes les nullit\u00e9s de la proc\u00e9dure d\u2019instruction, quelle que soit la violation de la r\u00e8gle de droit invoqu\u00e9e, l\u00e9gislation nationale ou internationale (Cass. 6 d\u00e9cembre 2012, n\u00b0 57 \/ 2012, n\u00b0 3141 du registre ; Cass. 31 janvier 2013, n\u00b0 3108\/2013 ; CSJ arr\u00eat n\u00b017\/16 Ch. Crim. du 31 mai 2016).<\/p>\n<p>Au vu de ce qui pr\u00e9c\u00e8de, le pr\u00e9ven u, n\u2019ayant pas soulev\u00e9 la nullit\u00e9 d\u2019un acte d\u2019instruction dans le d\u00e9lais l\u00e9gal, est forclos \u00e0 demander cette nullit\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019audience.<\/p>\n<p>La demande en nullit\u00e9 pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019audience du 10 d\u00e9cembre 2018 est partant \u00e0 rejeter.<\/p>\n<p>P A R C E S M O T I F S :<\/p>\n<p>le Tribunal d&#039;arrondissement de et \u00e0 Luxembourg, septi\u00e8me chambre, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8re correctionnelle, statuant contradictoirement, le mandataire du pr\u00e9venu entendu en ses explications et moyens de d\u00e9fense et le repr\u00e9sentant du Minist\u00e8re Public entendu en ses r\u00e9quisitions,<\/p>\n<p>r e j e t t e le moyen de nullit\u00e9 soulev\u00e9 par P.1.) ;<\/p>\n<p>r \u00e9 s e r v e les frais.<\/p>\n<p>Le tout en application des articles 1, 126, 179, 182, 184, 185, 190, 190- 1, 195 et 196 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale dont mention a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite.<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi fait et jug\u00e9 par Vincent FRANCK , vice-pr\u00e9sident, Patrice HOFFMANN, premier juge, et Jackie MAROLDT, juge, et prononc\u00e9, en pr\u00e9sence de Patrick KONSBRUCK, substitut principal du Procureur d\u2019Etat, en l&#039;audience publique du Tribunal d&#039;arrondissement de Luxembourg, date qu&#039;en t\u00eate, par le vice- pr\u00e9sident, assist\u00e9 du greffier assum\u00e9 Tahnee WAGNER, qui, \u00e0 l&#039;exception du repr\u00e9sentant du Minist\u00e8re Public, ont sign\u00e9 le pr\u00e9sent jugement.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/data.public.lu\/fr\/datasets\/tribunal-darrondissement-luxembourg-penal\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/download.data.public.lu\/resources\/tribunal-darrondissement-luxembourg-penal\/20240828-013629\/20181213-talux7-3240a-accessible.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jugt no 3240\/2 018 Notice no 2178\/17\/CD \/ J U G E M E N T S U R I N C I D E N T AUDIENCE PUBLIQUE DU 13 DECEMBRE 201 8 Le Tribunal d&#8217;arrondissement de et \u00e0 Luxembourg, chambre correctionnelle, a rendu\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[23583],"kji_chamber":[25729],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[23584,8464,7636],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-776859","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-tribunal-darrondissement","kji_chamber-penal","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-arrondissement","kji_keyword-decembre","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.6 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal d&#039;arrondissement, 13 d\u00e9cembre 2018 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal d&#039;arrondissement, 13 d\u00e9cembre 2018\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jugt no 3240\/2 018 Notice no 2178\/17\/CD \/ J U G E M E N T S U R I N C I D E N T AUDIENCE PUBLIQUE DU 13 DECEMBRE 201 8 Le Tribunal d&#039;arrondissement de et \u00e0 Luxembourg, chambre correctionnelle, a rendu\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-30T07:27:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal d'arrondissement, 13 d\u00e9cembre 2018 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T07:27:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-30T07:27:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Tribunal d&rsquo;arrondissement, 13 d\u00e9cembre 2018\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal d'arrondissement, 13 d\u00e9cembre 2018 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal d'arrondissement, 13 d\u00e9cembre 2018","og_description":"Jugt no 3240\/2 018 Notice no 2178\/17\/CD \/ J U G E M E N T S U R I N C I D E N T AUDIENCE PUBLIQUE DU 13 DECEMBRE 201 8 Le Tribunal d'arrondissement de et \u00e0 Luxembourg, chambre correctionnelle, a rendu\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-04-30T07:27:28+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"5 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\/","name":"Tribunal d'arrondissement, 13 d\u00e9cembre 2018 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T07:27:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-30T07:27:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/tribunal-darrondissement-13-decembre-2018-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Tribunal d&rsquo;arrondissement, 13 d\u00e9cembre 2018"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/776859","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=776859"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=776859"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=776859"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=776859"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=776859"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=776859"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=776859"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=776859"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}