{"id":778060,"date":"2026-04-30T10:26:45","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T08:26:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\/"},"modified":"2026-04-30T10:26:45","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T08:26:45","slug":"kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\/","title":{"rendered":"KHO 27.11.2018\/5590 &#8212; Kommunal\u00e4rende"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade att avg\u00f6ra huruvida beslutet om val av ledam\u00f6ter och ers\u00e4ttare i gemenskaplighetsn\u00e4mnden, som fattats av kommunfullm\u00e4ktige i X, var olagligt p\u00e5 den grunden att \u00e4ven s\u00e5dana personer som inte var fullm\u00e4ktigeledam\u00f6ter eller ers\u00e4ttare hade valts till ledam\u00f6ter i n\u00e4mnden. Enligt 10 \u00a7 i kommunens f\u00f6rvaltningsstadga skulle ledam\u00f6terna och ers\u00e4ttarna i n\u00e4mnden i f\u00f6rsta hand v\u00e4ljas bland fullm\u00e4ktigeledam\u00f6ter och ers\u00e4ttare i fullm\u00e4ktige. I det val som hade f\u00f6rr\u00e4ttats hade s\u00e5dana f\u00f6reslagna personer, som var fullm\u00e4ktigeledam\u00f6ter eller ers\u00e4ttare i fullm\u00e4ktige, inte blivit valda. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade upph\u00e4vt fullm\u00e4ktiges beslut som olagligt p\u00e5 grund av att det stred mot den n\u00e4mnda best\u00e4mmelsen i f\u00f6rvaltningsstadgan.<\/p>\n<p>H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade att det av 31 \u00a7 1 punkten i kommunallagen framg\u00e5r att fullm\u00e4ktige kan besluta att vid organens sammans\u00e4ttning anv\u00e4nda s\u00e5 kallad utskottsmodell, varvid till ledam\u00f6ter kan v\u00e4ljas endast fullm\u00e4ktigeledam\u00f6ter och ers\u00e4ttare i fullm\u00e4ktige. Enligt best\u00e4mmelsen i 10 \u00a7 i f\u00f6rvaltningsstadgan var det inte fr\u00e5ga om en s\u00e5dan modell.<\/p>\n<p>H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen ans\u00e5g att best\u00e4mmelsen i f\u00f6rvaltningsstadgan kunde i och f\u00f6r sig anses vara \u00f6ppen f\u00f6r tolkning p\u00e5 det s\u00e4tt som f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterat. Best\u00e4mmelsen f\u00f6rutsatte emellertid inte att ledam\u00f6terna och ers\u00e4ttarna i n\u00e4mnderna skulle v\u00e4ljas endast bland fullm\u00e4ktigeledam\u00f6ter och ers\u00e4ttare i fullm\u00e4ktige. Med h\u00e4nsyn till detta hade kommunfullm\u00e4ktige inte handlat i strid med 10 \u00a7 i f\u00f6rvaltningsstadgan d\u00e5 den i valet av ledam\u00f6ter och ers\u00e4ttare hade valt \u00e4ven andra personer \u00e4n fullm\u00e4ktigeledam\u00f6ter och ers\u00e4ttare i fullm\u00e4ktige. Eftersom fullm\u00e4ktiges beslut inte var olagligt upph\u00e4vdes f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut och besv\u00e4ren som anf\u00f6rts hos f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen avvisades.<\/p>\n<p>Kommunallagen 14 \u00a7 2 mom. och 31 \u00a7 1 punkten<\/p>\n<p>\u00c4rendet har avgjorts av justitier\u00e5den Eija Siitari, Alice Guimaraes-Purokoski, Outi Suviranta, Timo R\u00e4bin\u00e4 och Pekka Aalto. F\u00f6redragande Riitta Kreula.<\/p>\n<p>Korkeimmassa hallinto-oikeudessa oli ratkaistavana, oliko X:n kunnanvaltuuston p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6st\u00e4 yhteis\u00f6llisyyslautakunnan j\u00e4senten ja varaj\u00e4senten valinnasta pidett\u00e4v\u00e4 kuntalain tarkoittamalla tavalla lainvastaisena sill\u00e4 perusteella, ett\u00e4 lautakunnan j\u00e4seniksi ja varaj\u00e4seniksi oli valittu my\u00f6s sellaisia henkil\u00f6it\u00e4, jotka eiv\u00e4t olleet valtuutettuja tai varavaltuutettuja. Kunnan hallintos\u00e4\u00e4nn\u00f6n 10 \u00a7:n mukaan lautakunnan j\u00e4senet ja varaj\u00e4senet valittiin ensisijaisesti valtuutettujen ja varavaltuutettujen keskuudesta. Suoritetussa vaalissa lautakuntaan oli j\u00e4\u00e4nyt valitsematta sellaisia lautakuntaan valittavaksi esitettyj\u00e4 henkil\u00f6it\u00e4, jotka olivat valtuutettuja tai varavaltuutettuja. Hallinto-oikeus oli kumonnut valtuuston p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen hallintos\u00e4\u00e4nn\u00f6n mainitun m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yksen vastaisuuden vuoksi lainvastaisena.<\/p>\n<p>Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi, ett\u00e4 kuntalain 31 \u00a7:n 1 kohdasta ilmenee, ett\u00e4 valtuusto voi p\u00e4\u00e4tt\u00e4\u00e4 kunnan toimielinorganisaation muodostamisesta niin sanottua valiokuntamallia k\u00e4ytt\u00e4en, jolloin lautakuntaan voidaan valita vain valtuutettuja ja varavaltuutettuja. Hallintos\u00e4\u00e4nn\u00f6n 10 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 ei ollut kysymys t\u00e4llaisesta mallista.<\/p>\n<p>Korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, ett\u00e4 hallintos\u00e4\u00e4nn\u00f6n m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4yst\u00e4 voitiin hallinto-oikeuden toteamin tavoin pit\u00e4\u00e4 sin\u00e4ns\u00e4 tulkinnanvaraisena. M\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4ys ei kuitenkaan edellytt\u00e4nyt, ett\u00e4 lautakuntien j\u00e4senet ja varaj\u00e4senet valittaisiin vain valtuutettujen ja varavaltuutettujen keskuudesta. T\u00e4h\u00e4n n\u00e4hden kunnanvaltuusto ei ollut toiminut hallintos\u00e4\u00e4nn\u00f6n 10 \u00a7:n vastaisesti yhteis\u00f6llisyyslautakunnan j\u00e4senten ja varaj\u00e4senten vaalissa valitessaan toimielimeen my\u00f6s muita kuin valtuutettuja ja varavaltuutettuja. Koska valtuuston p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s ei ollut lainvastainen, hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s kumottiin ja hallinto-oikeudelle tehty valitus hyl\u00e4ttiin.<\/p>\n<h3>Kuntalaki 14 \u00a7 2 momentti ja 31 \u00a7 1 momentti 1 kohta<\/h3>\n<p>Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Eija Siitari, Alice Guimaraes-Purokoski, Outi Suviranta, Timo R\u00e4bin\u00e4 ja Pekka Aalto. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Riitta Kreula.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.finlex.fi\/en\/case-law\/supreme-administrative-court\/decision-summary\/2018\/5590\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade att avg\u00f6ra huruvida beslutet om val av ledam\u00f6ter och ers\u00e4ttare i gemenskaplighetsn\u00e4mnden, som fattats av kommunfullm\u00e4ktige i X, var olagligt p\u00e5 den grunden att \u00e4ven s\u00e5dana personer som inte var fullm\u00e4ktigeledam\u00f6ter eller ers\u00e4ttare hade valts till ledam\u00f6ter i n\u00e4mnden. Enligt 10 \u00a7 i kommunens f\u00f6rvaltningsstadga skulle ledam\u00f6terna och ers\u00e4ttarna i n\u00e4mnden i&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[28668],"kji_chamber":[31727],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[36908,28676,48293,33106,48294],"kji_language":[7746],"class_list":["post-778060","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-administrative-de-finlande","kji_chamber-sommaires","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-ersattare","kji_keyword-forvaltningsdomstolen","kji_keyword-fullmaktigeledamoter","kji_keyword-ledamoter","kji_keyword-olagligt","kji_language-multilingue"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>KHO 27.11.2018\/5590 - Kommunal\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KHO 27.11.2018\/5590 - Kommunal\u00e4rende\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade att avg\u00f6ra huruvida beslutet om val av ledam\u00f6ter och ers\u00e4ttare i gemenskaplighetsn\u00e4mnden, som fattats av kommunfullm\u00e4ktige i X, var olagligt p\u00e5 den grunden att \u00e4ven s\u00e5dana personer som inte var fullm\u00e4ktigeledam\u00f6ter eller ers\u00e4ttare hade valts till ledam\u00f6ter i n\u00e4mnden. Enligt 10 \u00a7 i kommunens f\u00f6rvaltningsstadga skulle ledam\u00f6terna och ers\u00e4ttarna i n\u00e4mnden i...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\\\/\",\"name\":\"KHO 27.11.2018\\\/5590 - Kommunal\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T08:26:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KHO 27.11.2018\\\/5590 &#8211; Kommunal\u00e4rende\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KHO 27.11.2018\/5590 - Kommunal\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"KHO 27.11.2018\/5590 - Kommunal\u00e4rende","og_description":"H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade att avg\u00f6ra huruvida beslutet om val av ledam\u00f6ter och ers\u00e4ttare i gemenskaplighetsn\u00e4mnden, som fattats av kommunfullm\u00e4ktige i X, var olagligt p\u00e5 den grunden att \u00e4ven s\u00e5dana personer som inte var fullm\u00e4ktigeledam\u00f6ter eller ers\u00e4ttare hade valts till ledam\u00f6ter i n\u00e4mnden. Enligt 10 \u00a7 i kommunens f\u00f6rvaltningsstadga skulle ledam\u00f6terna och ers\u00e4ttarna i n\u00e4mnden i...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\/","name":"KHO 27.11.2018\/5590 - Kommunal\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T08:26:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-27-11-2018-5590-kommunalarende\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KHO 27.11.2018\/5590 &#8211; Kommunal\u00e4rende"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/778060","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=778060"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=778060"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=778060"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=778060"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=778060"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=778060"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=778060"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=778060"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}