{"id":791629,"date":"2026-05-01T00:23:32","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T22:23:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T00:23:35","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T22:23:35","slug":"cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation, 22 f\u00e9vrier 2018, n\u00b0 0222-3878"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

N\u00b0 09 \/ 2018 p\u00e9nal. du 22.02.2018. Not. 724\/ 15\/PEL Num\u00e9ro 3878 du registre.<\/p>\n

La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l'organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, vingt -deux f\u00e9vrier deux mille dix-huit,<\/p>\n

sur le pourvoi de :<\/p>\n

X, n\u00e9e le (\u2026) \u00e0 (\u2026 ), demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n

demanderesse en cassation,<\/p>\n

comparant par Ma\u00eetre Catherine ZELTNER, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, en l\u2019\u00e9tude de laquelle domicile est \u00e9lu,<\/p>\n

en pr\u00e9sence du Minist\u00e8re p ublic<\/p>\n

et de :<\/p>\n

Y, n\u00e9 le (\u2026) \u00e0 (\u2026.), demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n

d\u00e9fendeur en cassation,<\/p>\n

l\u2019arr\u00eat qui suit :<\/p>\n

=======================================================<\/p>\n

LA COUR DE CASSATION :<\/p>\n

Vu l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, rendu le 24 janvier 2017 sous le num\u00e9ro 04\/17 — Appel de la Jeunesse — par la c hambre d\u2019appel de la jeunesse de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg ;<\/p>\n

Vu le pourvoi en cassation form\u00e9 par Ma\u00eetre Catherine ZELTNER, pour et au nom d\u2019 X, suivant d\u00e9claration du 17 f\u00e9vrier 2017 au greffe de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice ;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en cassation signifi\u00e9 le 10 mars 2017 par X au Minist\u00e8re public et \u00e0 Y , d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le 15 mars 2017 au greffe de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice ;<\/p>\n

2 Sur le rapport du pr\u00e9sident Jean-Claude WIWINIUS et sur les conclusions du premier avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Simone FLAMMANG ;<\/p>\n

Sur la recevabilit\u00e9 du pourvoi qui est contest\u00e9e :<\/p>\n

Attendu que le pourvoi en cassation est dirig\u00e9 contre une d\u00e9cision de la Cour d\u2019appel qui a confirm\u00e9 le rejet d\u2019une demande en mainlev\u00e9e de mesures de garde provisoires concernant les trois enfants mineurs communs des parties demanderesse et d\u00e9fenderesse en cassation ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019avant de proc\u00e9der au d\u00e9p\u00f4t de son m\u00e9moire en cassation, la demanderesse en cassation a fait signifier le m\u00e9moire au d\u00e9fendeur Y , le p\u00e8re des trois enfants, et au Minist\u00e8re public, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par le Procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral d\u2019Etat ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que le repr\u00e9sentant du Minist\u00e8re public conclut \u00e0 l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 du pourvoi en raison du d\u00e9faut de signification du m\u00e9moire en cassation aux trois mineurs, sinon \u00e0 leurs repr\u00e9sentants l\u00e9gaux ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que le recours en cassation en mati\u00e8re de protection de la jeunesse est, \u00e0 d\u00e9faut de disposition de proc\u00e9dure sp\u00e9ciale dans la loi modifi\u00e9e du 10 ao\u00fbt 1992 relative \u00e0 la protection de la jeunesse (ci-apr\u00e8s \u00ab la loi du 10 ao\u00fbt 1992 \u00bb), r\u00e9gi, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la disposition g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de l\u2019article 19 de cette loi, par les r\u00e8gles applicables en mati\u00e8re r\u00e9pressive ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019il r\u00e9sulte de l\u2019article 43, alin\u00e9a 2, de la loi modifi\u00e9e du 18 f\u00e9vrier 1885 sur les pourvois et la proc\u00e9dure en cassation qu\u2019avant d\u2019\u00eatre d\u00e9pos\u00e9 au greffe, le m\u00e9moire de la partie demanderesse en cassation doit \u00eatre signifi\u00e9 aux parties adverses ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que la finalit\u00e9 de cette disposition l\u00e9gale consiste \u00e0 assurer le respect des droits de la d\u00e9fense ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 21 de la loi du 10 ao\u00fbt 1992, le mineur lui-m\u00eame, son tuteur ou toutes autres personnes qui ont la garde du mineur, sont parties \u00e0 l\u2019instance judiciaire ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019en omettant de signifier son m\u00e9moire aux repr\u00e9sentants des mineurs, la demanderesse en cassation a priv\u00e9 ceux-ci de la possibilit\u00e9 de d\u00e9fendre les int\u00e9r\u00eats des mineurs \u00e0 l\u2019instance de cassation ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que les dispositions concernant la recevabilit\u00e9 du pourvoi en cassation sont d\u2019ordre public et s\u2019appr\u00e9cient au jour de l\u2019introduction du recours, de sorte que la signification du pourvoi \u00e0 l\u2019avocat des mineurs op\u00e9r\u00e9e par la demanderesse apr\u00e8s les conclusions du repr\u00e9sentant du Minist\u00e8re public est d\u00e9pourvue d\u2019effet ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il en suit que le pourvoi est irrecevable ;<\/p>\n

3 Par ces motifs,<\/p>\n

d\u00e9clare le pourvoi irrecevable ;<\/p>\n

condamne la demanderesse en cassation aux frais de l\u2019instance en cassation, ceux expos\u00e9s par le Minist\u00e8re public \u00e9tant liquid\u00e9s \u00e0 2,25 euros.<\/p>\n

Ainsi jug\u00e9 par la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg en son audience publique du jeudi, vingt -deux f\u00e9vrier deux mille dix-huit, \u00e0 la Cit\u00e9 Judiciaire, B\u00e2timent CR, Plateau du St. Esprit, compos\u00e9e de :<\/p>\n

Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Nico EDON, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Carlo HEYARD, c onseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Marianne HARLES, premier conseiller \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel,<\/p>\n

qui ont sign\u00e9 le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat avec le greffier Viviane PROBST.<\/p>\n

La lecture du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite en la susdite audience publique par Monsieur le pr\u00e9sident Jean -Claude WIWINIUS, en pr\u00e9sence de Monsieur Marc HARPES, avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, et de Madame Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

N\u00b0 09 \/ 2018 p\u00e9nal. du 22.02.2018. Not. 724\/ 15\/PEL Num\u00e9ro 3878 du registre. La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l’organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, vingt -deux\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[8423],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,8457,8425],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-791629","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-de-cassation","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-fevrier","kji_keyword-penal","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation, 22 f\u00e9vrier 2018, n\u00b0 0222-3878 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation, 22 f\u00e9vrier 2018, n\u00b0 0222-3878\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"N\u00b0 09 \/ 2018 p\u00e9nal. du 22.02.2018. Not. 724\/ 15\/PEL Num\u00e9ro 3878 du registre. La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l'organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, vingt -deux\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-30T22:23:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 22 f\u00e9vrier 2018, n\u00b0 0222-3878 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T22:23:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-30T22:23:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 22 f\u00e9vrier 2018, n\u00b0 0222-3878\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation, 22 f\u00e9vrier 2018, n\u00b0 0222-3878 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation, 22 f\u00e9vrier 2018, n\u00b0 0222-3878","og_description":"N\u00b0 09 \/ 2018 p\u00e9nal. du 22.02.2018. Not. 724\/ 15\/PEL Num\u00e9ro 3878 du registre. La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l'organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, vingt -deux\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-04-30T22:23:35+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"4 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\/","name":"Cour de cassation, 22 f\u00e9vrier 2018, n\u00b0 0222-3878 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T22:23:32+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-30T22:23:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-fevrier-2018-n-0222-3878\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation, 22 f\u00e9vrier 2018, n\u00b0 0222-3878"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/791629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=791629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=791629"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=791629"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=791629"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=791629"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=791629"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=791629"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=791629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}