{"id":793079,"date":"2026-05-01T01:43:43","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T23:43:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T01:43:43","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T23:43:43","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 10 avril 2018, 42\/13-CO n\u00b0 146 &#8212; Servitude de passage"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Foncier<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : Co\u00fbt Servitude de passage \u2013 mesure d\u2019expertise \u2013 opportunit\u00e9 \u2013 appr\u00e9ciation \u2013 juges du fond<\/p>\n<p>La Cour, en refusant d\u2019ordonner une mesure d\u2019expertise pour d\u00e9terminer le co\u00fbt de la servitude de passage, n\u2019a nullement priv\u00e9 le propri\u00e9taire de fonds de son droit de demander une indemnisation mais a entendu \u00e9viter de retarder la proc\u00e9dure par une mesure sans int\u00e9r\u00eat pour la solution du litige<\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Civile<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 146 du 10 avril 2018<\/p>\n<p>Dossier : 42\/13-CO<\/p>\n<p>COUT SERVITUDE DE PASSAGE \u2013 MESURE D\u2019EXPERTISE \u2013 OPPORTUNITE \u2013 APPRECIATION \u2013 JUGES DU FOND<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab La Cour, en refusant d\u2019ordonner une mesure d\u2019expertise pour d\u00e9terminer le co\u00fbt de la servitude de passage, n\u2019a nullement priv\u00e9 le propri\u00e9taire de fonds de son droit de demander une indemnisation mais a entendu \u00e9viter de retarder la proc\u00e9dure par une mesure sans int\u00e9r\u00eat pour la solution du litige \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 XXX et consorts<\/p>\n<p>H\u00e9ritiers de Rmz et de Rdm<\/p>\n<p>R\u00c9PUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Cour de Cassation<\/p>\n<p>Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du mardi dix avril deux mille dix huit, tenue au Palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi de R., demeurant au [adresse 1] , Antananarivo, et la Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 XXX, dont si\u00e8ge social [adresse], Ambohidahy, tous deux ayant pour conseil Ma\u00eetre ANDRIAMADISON Hasina, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, \u00e9lisant domicile en l\u2019\u00e9tude de leur conseil 9, Rue Indira Gandhi, Antananarivo, contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 835 rendu le 21 juillet 2010 par la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel d\u2019Antananarivo, dans la proc\u00e9dure qui les oppose aux h\u00e9ritiers Rmz;<\/p>\n<p>Vu les m\u00e9moires en demande et en d\u00e9fense ; <\/p>\n<p>Sur les deux moyens de cassation r\u00e9unis tir\u00e9s des articles 25 et 26 de la Loi organique n\u00b02004.036 du 1er octobre 2004 sur la Cour Supr\u00eame, pris de la violation de l\u2019article 283 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile et de l\u2019article 682 du Code Civil Fran\u00e7ais, pour contradiction de motifs, violation de la loi, exc\u00e8s de pouvoir, absence, insuffisance et g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement impossibilit\u00e9 pour la Cour de Cassation d\u2019exercer son contr\u00f4le en ce que la Cour d\u2019Appel a rejet\u00e9 la demande de renvoi du dossier devant le juge d\u2019expertise en premi\u00e8re instance pour l\u2019\u00e9valuation du co\u00fbt de la servitude de passage alors que le propri\u00e9taire du fonds servant est en droit de solliciter une indemnisation proportionnelle aux dommages occasionn\u00e9s par le passage ; (premier moyen)<\/p>\n<p>En ce que la Cour d\u2019Appel a refus\u00e9 l\u2019indemnisation de la servitude de passage alors que cette indemnisation est de droit ; (deuxi\u00e8me moyen)<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que la Cour d\u2019Appel \u00e9nonce dans l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 que \u00ab il suffit que l\u2019une des parties intente un nouveau proc\u00e8s pour la d\u00e9termination du co\u00fbt de la servitude de passage \u00bb ;<\/p>\n<p>Que la Cour en d\u00e9cidant ainsi, n\u2019a gu\u00e8re priv\u00e9 les demandeurs de leur droit de demander une indemnisation mais a entendu \u00e9viter de retarder la proc\u00e9dure par une mesure sans int\u00e9r\u00eat pour la solution du litige ;<\/p>\n<p>Que les moyens avanc\u00e9s sont non fond\u00e9s ;<\/p>\n<p>REJETTE le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n<p>Condamne les demandeurs \u00e0 l\u2019amende et aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par Cour, Chambre les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>Messieurs et Mesdames<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.\/.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS68389AFFE9D8B\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS68389AFFE9D8B\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Foncier Mots cl\u00e9s : Co\u00fbt Servitude de passage \u2013 mesure d\u2019expertise \u2013 opportunit\u00e9 \u2013 appr\u00e9ciation \u2013 juges du fond La Cour, en refusant d\u2019ordonner une mesure d\u2019expertise pour d\u00e9terminer le co\u00fbt de la servitude de passage, n\u2019a nullement priv\u00e9 le propri\u00e9taire de fonds de son droit de demander une indemnisation mais a entendu&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8601,8424,48966,22914,13938],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-793079","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-avril","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-passage","kji_keyword-servitude","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.6 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 10 avril 2018, 42\/13-CO n\u00b0 146 - Servitude de passage - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 10 avril 2018, 42\/13-CO n\u00b0 146 - Servitude de passage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Foncier Mots cl\u00e9s : Co\u00fbt Servitude de passage \u2013 mesure d\u2019expertise \u2013 opportunit\u00e9 \u2013 appr\u00e9ciation \u2013 juges du fond La Cour, en refusant d\u2019ordonner une mesure d\u2019expertise pour d\u00e9terminer le co\u00fbt de la servitude de passage, n\u2019a nullement priv\u00e9 le propri\u00e9taire de fonds de son droit de demander une indemnisation mais a entendu...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 10 avril 2018, 42\\\/13-CO n\u00b0 146 - Servitude de passage - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T23:43:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 10 avril 2018, 42\\\/13-CO n\u00b0 146 &#8211; Servitude de passage\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 10 avril 2018, 42\/13-CO n\u00b0 146 - Servitude de passage - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 10 avril 2018, 42\/13-CO n\u00b0 146 - Servitude de passage","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Foncier Mots cl\u00e9s : Co\u00fbt Servitude de passage \u2013 mesure d\u2019expertise \u2013 opportunit\u00e9 \u2013 appr\u00e9ciation \u2013 juges du fond La Cour, en refusant d\u2019ordonner une mesure d\u2019expertise pour d\u00e9terminer le co\u00fbt de la servitude de passage, n\u2019a nullement priv\u00e9 le propri\u00e9taire de fonds de son droit de demander une indemnisation mais a entendu...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 10 avril 2018, 42\/13-CO n\u00b0 146 - Servitude de passage - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T23:43:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-10-avril-2018-42-13-co-n-146-servitude-de-passage\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 10 avril 2018, 42\/13-CO n\u00b0 146 &#8211; Servitude de passage"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/793079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=793079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=793079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=793079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=793079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=793079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=793079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=793079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=793079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}