{"id":804777,"date":"2026-05-01T12:07:09","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T10:07:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T12:07:09","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T10:07:09","slug":"kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\/","title":{"rendered":"KHO 29.12.2017\/6928 — Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Asyls\u00f6kanden var en afghansk medborgare som bott l\u00e4nge i Iran. S\u00f6kanden hade som skyddsgrund i sin ans\u00f6kan om internationellt skydd uppgett hot fr\u00e5n en inflytelserik privatperson fr\u00e5n Kabul i Afghanistan. Asyls\u00f6kanden hade medan han bodde i Iran haft ett f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande med den ifr\u00e5gavarande privatpersonens hustru.<\/p>\n

Migrationsverket hade pr\u00f6vat \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kandens asylans\u00f6kan i f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande till hans hemland Afghanistan. Migrationsverket hade i samband med pr\u00f6vningen av asylans\u00f6kan gjort riskbed\u00f6mningen i f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande till Afghanistan i allm\u00e4nhet och ansett att \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden skulle ha haft m\u00f6jlighet att bo p\u00e5 ett lugnare omr\u00e5de i landet, som t.ex. i Kabul.<\/p>\n

H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade att riskbed\u00f6mningen m\u00e5ste g\u00f6ras skilt fr\u00e5n fall till fall och riskbed\u00f6mningen i samband med \u00e5terv\u00e4ndande inbegriper bland annat den s\u00f6kandes verkliga destination i ifr\u00e5gavarande land. I det aktuella fallet var \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden fr\u00e5n Kabul i Afghanistan. Han hade d\u00e4rifr\u00e5n vid sex \u00e5rs \u00e5lder med sina f\u00f6r\u00e4ldrar flyttat till Iran. \u00c4ndringss\u00f6kanden hade inte bes\u00f6kt Afghanistan efter att han flyttat d\u00e4rifr\u00e5n. Migrationsverket borde d\u00e4rf\u00f6r ha gjort riskbed\u00f6mningen i f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande till Kabul och inte till Afghanistan i allm\u00e4nhet. D\u00e5 f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade gjort riskbed\u00f6mningen i f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande till Kabul hade beslutet inte i detta skede baserat sig p\u00e5 en felaktig riskbed\u00f6mning.<\/p>\n

H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade att enligt den landinformation som f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen h\u00e4nvisat till i sitt beslut och som fortfarande skulle anses aktuell, kunde ett brytande av traditionella moralregler orsaka h\u00e4ftiga reaktioner i den afghanska kulturen. Migrationsverket har i sitt utl\u00e5tande konstaterat att verket inte har anledning att betvivla det inflytande den f\u00f6r hotet utpekade privatpersonen har i Kabul.<\/p>\n

H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen ans\u00e5g att det hot som riktade sig mot \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden inte var i 87 \u00a7 i utl\u00e4nningslagen avsedd f\u00f6rf\u00f6ljelse. \u00c4ndringss\u00f6kanden kunde f\u00f6ljaktligen inte beviljas asyl. Med h\u00e4nvisning till alternativt skydd ans\u00e5g h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen det inte uteslutet att den ifr\u00e5gavarande personen pga sitt inflytande skulle kunna uts\u00e4tta \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden f\u00f6r allvarlig fara i Kabul utan att \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden skulle kunna f\u00e5 myndighetsskydd mot hotet. Enligt den utredning som erh\u00e5llits i \u00e4rendet var det ytterst sannolikt att en s\u00e5dan fara skulle uppst\u00e5. P\u00e5 dessa grunder ans\u00e5g h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen det tillr\u00e4ckligt utrett att \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden i Kabul skulle uts\u00e4ttas f\u00f6r en verklig risk att lida allvarlig skada i enlighet med 88 \u00a7 1 mom. 1 och 2 punkterna. Det skulle trots det \u00e4nnu utredas om \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kanden kunde vistas i n\u00e5gon annan del av Afghanistan utan n\u00e4mnda risk f\u00f6r allvarlig skada.<\/p>\n

H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen upph\u00e4vde Migrationsverkets och f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut och \u00e5tervisade \u00e4rendet till Migrationsverket f\u00f6r ny pr\u00f6vning f\u00f6r att bed\u00f6ma m\u00f6jligheterna till intern flykt i enlighet med 88 e \u00a7 i utl\u00e4nningslagen.<\/p>\n

Utl\u00e4nningslagen 87 \u00a7 1 mom., 87 a \u00a7 1 mom., 87 b \u00a7 1 och 2 mom., 88 \u00a7 1 mom., 88 b \u00a7, 88 e \u00a7 och 147 \u00a7<\/p>\n

\u00c4rendet har avgjorts av justitier\u00e5den Janne Aer, Tuomas Kuokkanen, Mikko Puumalainen, Anne Nenonen och Pekka Aalto. F\u00f6redragande Juuso Peltonen.<\/p>\n

Turvapaikanhakija oli pitk\u00e4\u00e4n Iranissa el\u00e4nyt Afganistanin kansalainen. Hakija oli kansainv\u00e4lisen suojelun perusteena vedonnut uhkaan vaikutusvaltaisen, Afganistanin Kabulissa asuvan yksityishenkil\u00f6n taholta. Turvapaikanhakijalla oli ollut Iranissa asuessaan suhde kyseisen yksityishenkil\u00f6n puolisoon.<\/p>\n

Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi, ett\u00e4 kansainv\u00e4list\u00e4 suojelua koskevan hakemuksen arviointi on suoritettava tapauskohtaisesti, ja palauttamista koskevan riskiarvioinnin osalta se k\u00e4sitt\u00e4\u00e4 muun ohella hakijan todellisen m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4np\u00e4\u00e4n, jos h\u00e4net palautetaan asianomaiseen maahan. Nyt puheena olevassa asiassa valittaja oli syntynyt Afganistanissa, Kabulissa, josta h\u00e4n oli muuttanut perheens\u00e4 mukana kuusivuotiaana Iraniin. Valittaja ei ollut k\u00e4ynyt Afganistanissa poismuuttonsa j\u00e4lkeen. N\u00e4in ollen Maahanmuuttoviraston olisi tullut suorittaa valittajan hakemusta koskeva riskiarvio suhteessa Afganistanin Kabuliin, ei Afganistanin yleisen turvallisuustilanteen kannalta. Kun hallinto-oikeus on kuitenkin asiaa k\u00e4sitelless\u00e4\u00e4n tehnyt valittajan asemaa koskevan riskiarvion suhteessa Kabuliin, niin t\u00e4lt\u00e4 osin asian ratkaisu ei t\u00e4ss\u00e4 vaiheessa perustunut puutteelliseen riskiarvioon.<\/p>\n

Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi, ett\u00e4 hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksess\u00e4\u00e4n viittaaman edelleen ajantasaisena pidett\u00e4v\u00e4n maatiedon mukaan perinteisten moraalinormien rikkominen voi aiheuttaa voimakkaita reaktioita afganistanilaisessa kulttuurissa. Maahanmuuttovirasto on lausunnossaan todennut, ett\u00e4 sill\u00e4 ei ole syyt\u00e4 kyseenalaistaa asiassa uhan muodostaneen yksityishenkil\u00f6n vaikutusvaltaa Kabulissa.<\/p>\n

Korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, ett\u00e4 valittajaan Kabulissa kohdistuva uhassa ei ollut kyse ulkomaalaislain 87 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 tarkoitetusta vainosta eik\u00e4 h\u00e4nelle n\u00e4in ollen ollut tullut my\u00f6nt\u00e4\u00e4 turvapaikkaa. Toissijaisen suojelun osalta korkein hallinto-oikeus arvioi, ettei asiassa voitu poissulkea sit\u00e4 mahdollisuutta, ett\u00e4 kyseinen henkil\u00f6 voisi vaikutusvaltansa vuoksi saattaa valittajan vakavaan vaaraan Kabulissa, eik\u00e4 valittajan olisi mahdollista t\u00e4t\u00e4 uhkaa vastaan turvautua viranomaisten antamaan suojaan. Asiassa esitetyn selvityksen perusteella t\u00e4llaisen vaaran toteutuminen oli varsin todenn\u00e4k\u00f6ist\u00e4. T\u00e4m\u00e4n vuoksi korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, ett\u00e4 oli olemassa riitt\u00e4v\u00e4t perusteet arvioida valittajan olevan Kabulissa todellisessa vaarassa k\u00e4rsi\u00e4 vakavaa haittaa ulkomaalaislain 88 \u00a7:n 1 momentin 1 ja 2 kohdassa tarkoitetuilla tavoilla. Asiassa oli kuitenkin viel\u00e4 arvioitava, oliko valittajalla mahdollisuus oleskella muualla Afganistanissa ilman edell\u00e4 mainitun vakavan haitan uhkaa.<\/p>\n

Korkein hallinto-oikeus kumosi hallinto-oikeuden ja Maahanmuuttoviraston valituksenalaiset p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kset ja palautti asian Maahanmuuttovirastolle uudelleen k\u00e4sitelt\u00e4v\u00e4ksi ulkomaalaislain 88 e \u00a7:ss\u00e4 s\u00e4\u00e4detyn sis\u00e4isen paon edellytysten arvioimiseksi.<\/p>\n

Ulkomaalaislaki 87 \u00a7 1 momentti, 87 a \u00a7 1 momentti, 87 b \u00a7 1 ja 2 momentti, 88 \u00a7 1 momentti, 88 b \u00a7, 88 e \u00a7 ja 147 \u00a7<\/p>\n

Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Janne Aer, Tuomas Kuokkanen, Mikko Puumalainen, Anne Nenonen ja Pekka Aalto. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Juuso Peltonen.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Asyls\u00f6kanden var en afghansk medborgare som bott l\u00e4nge i Iran. S\u00f6kanden hade som skyddsgrund i sin ans\u00f6kan om internationellt skydd uppgett hot fr\u00e5n en inflytelserik privatperson fr\u00e5n Kabul i Afghanistan. Asyls\u00f6kanden hade medan han bodde i Iran haft ett f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande med den ifr\u00e5gavarande privatpersonens hustru. Migrationsverket hade pr\u00f6vat \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kandens asylans\u00f6kan i f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande till hans hemland…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[28668],"kji_chamber":[31727],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[52836,49478,33577,29077,28700],"kji_language":[7746],"class_list":["post-804777","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-administrative-de-finlande","kji_chamber-sommaires","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-afghansk","kji_keyword-asylsokanden","kji_keyword-lange","kji_keyword-medborgare","kji_keyword-utlanningsarende","kji_language-multilingue"],"yoast_head":"\nKHO 29.12.2017\/6928 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KHO 29.12.2017\/6928 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Asyls\u00f6kanden var en afghansk medborgare som bott l\u00e4nge i Iran. S\u00f6kanden hade som skyddsgrund i sin ans\u00f6kan om internationellt skydd uppgett hot fr\u00e5n en inflytelserik privatperson fr\u00e5n Kabul i Afghanistan. Asyls\u00f6kanden hade medan han bodde i Iran haft ett f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande med den ifr\u00e5gavarande privatpersonens hustru. Migrationsverket hade pr\u00f6vat \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kandens asylans\u00f6kan i f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande till hans hemland...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\\\/\",\"name\":\"KHO 29.12.2017\\\/6928 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T10:07:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KHO 29.12.2017\\\/6928 – Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KHO 29.12.2017\/6928 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"KHO 29.12.2017\/6928 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende","og_description":"Asyls\u00f6kanden var en afghansk medborgare som bott l\u00e4nge i Iran. S\u00f6kanden hade som skyddsgrund i sin ans\u00f6kan om internationellt skydd uppgett hot fr\u00e5n en inflytelserik privatperson fr\u00e5n Kabul i Afghanistan. Asyls\u00f6kanden hade medan han bodde i Iran haft ett f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande med den ifr\u00e5gavarande privatpersonens hustru. Migrationsverket hade pr\u00f6vat \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kandens asylans\u00f6kan i f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande till hans hemland...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"5 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\/","name":"KHO 29.12.2017\/6928 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T10:07:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6928-utlanningsarende\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KHO 29.12.2017\/6928 – Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/804777","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=804777"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=804777"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=804777"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=804777"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=804777"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=804777"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=804777"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=804777"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}