{"id":805384,"date":"2026-05-01T14:00:27","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T12:00:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T14:00:27","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T12:00:27","slug":"kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\/","title":{"rendered":"KHO 15.12.2017\/6475 — Yliopiston p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Yliopiston dekaani oli p\u00e4\u00e4tt\u00e4nyt olla my\u00f6nt\u00e4m\u00e4tt\u00e4 A:lle uutta lis\u00e4aikaa t\u00e4m\u00e4n yliopistossa kesken olleiden opintojen suorittamiseen. Hallinto-oikeus oli hyl\u00e4nnyt A:n dekaanin p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksest\u00e4 tekem\u00e4n valituksen, koska yliopistolain 42 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 s\u00e4\u00e4detyt opiskeluajan jatkamisen edellytykset eiv\u00e4t t\u00e4yttyneet. Hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kseen liitetyn valitusosoituksen mukaan p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kseen sai hakea muutosta valittamalla korkeimpaan hallinto-oikeuteen vain, jos korkein hallinto-oikeus my\u00f6nt\u00e4\u00e4 valitusluvan.<\/p>\n

Yliopistolain 43 \u00a7:st\u00e4 ilmenee, ett\u00e4 opiskelija, jolle ei ole my\u00f6nnetty lis\u00e4aikaa opintojen loppuun saattamiseen, menett\u00e4\u00e4 opiskeluoikeutensa. Asiassa oli siten kysymys, paitsi opiskeluoikeuden jatkamatta j\u00e4tt\u00e4misest\u00e4 samalla my\u00f6s siit\u00e4, ett\u00e4 t\u00e4m\u00e4n p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen seurauksena oli v\u00e4ist\u00e4m\u00e4tt\u00e4 opiskeluoikeuden menett\u00e4minen yliopistolain 43 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 tarkoitetulla tavalla. Korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, ett\u00e4 sovellettavaksi tuli yliopistolain 84 \u00a7:n 3 momentin mukainen kielto valittaa hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksest\u00e4, joka koskee lain 43 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 tarkoitettua opiskeluoikeuden menett\u00e4mist\u00e4. Korkein hallinto-oikeus poisti hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kseen liitetyn valitusosoituksen ja j\u00e4tti A:n kirjelm\u00e4n tutkimatta valituslupahakemuksena.<\/p>\n

$a7<\/p>\n

Yliopistolaki 42 \u00a7 1 momentti, 43 \u00a7 1 momentti, 82 \u00a7 2 momentti, 83 a \u00a7 1 momentti, 84 \u00a7 3 momentti<\/h3>\n

Yhdenvertaisuuslaki 27 \u00a7<\/h3>\n

Hallintolaink\u00e4ytt\u00f6laki 63 \u00a7 1 momentti 1 kohta<\/h3>\n

Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Niilo J\u00e4\u00e4skinen, Eija Siitari, Outi Suviranta, Antti Pekkala ja Maarit Lindroos. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Riitta Kreula.<\/p>\n

Universitets dekanus hade inte beviljat A ny extra tid f\u00f6r att slutf\u00f6ra sina studier vid universitetet. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade avslagit A:s besv\u00e4r \u00f6ver dekanus\u2019 beslut p\u00e5 den grund att de i 42 \u00a7 i universitetslagen stadgade f\u00f6ruts\u00e4ttningarna f\u00f6r fortsatt studier\u00e4tt inte uppfylldes. Enligt den till f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut bifogade besv\u00e4rsanvisningen fick \u00f6ver beslutet anf\u00f6ras besv\u00e4r om h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen beviljar besv\u00e4rstillst\u00e5nd.<\/p>\n

Enligt 43 \u00a7 i universitetslagen f\u00f6rlorar en studerande som inte har beviljats extra tid f\u00f6r att slutf\u00f6ra sina studier sin studier\u00e4tt. Saken g\u00e4llde d\u00e4rf\u00f6r f\u00f6rutom fr\u00e5gan om att inte bevilja extra tid \u00e4ven det, att beslutet oundvikligen ledde till en f\u00f6rlust av studier\u00e4tten i enlighet med 43 \u00a7 i universitetslagen. H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen ans\u00e5g att f\u00f6rbudet i 84 \u00a7 3 mom. i universitetslagen att besv\u00e4ra sig \u00f6ver f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut i ett \u00e4rende som g\u00e4ller f\u00f6rlust av studier\u00e4tten enligt 43 \u00a7 i universitetslagen, skulle till\u00e4mpas i \u00e4rendet. H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen avl\u00e4gsnade den till f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut bifogade besv\u00e4rsanvisningen och avslog A:s skrivelse som besv\u00e4rstillst\u00e5ndsans\u00f6kan.<\/p>\n

H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen pr\u00f6vade \u00e4rendet som en ans\u00f6kan om \u00e5terbrytande av f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut. A hade i sin skrivelse bland annat framf\u00f6rt att det intr\u00e4ffat ett fel i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens f\u00f6rfarande d\u00e5 diskrimineringsombudsmannen inte hade beretts tillf\u00e4lle att yttra sig i saken. H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade p\u00e5 basis av den utredning g\u00e4llande A:s h\u00e4lsotillst\u00e5nd som ingick i \u00e4rendet, att f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen varit skyldig att till\u00e4mpa 8 och 15 \u00a7 i diskrimineringslagen i \u00e4rendet. I f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut n\u00e4mndes 8 \u00a7 \u00e4ven bland till\u00e4mpade lagrum. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen borde har berett diskrimineringsombudsmannen en m\u00f6jlighet att yttra sig med anledning av besv\u00e4ren i enlighet med 27 \u00a7 i diskrimineringslagen. Eftersom s\u00e5 inte hade skett hade det intr\u00e4ffat ett fel i f\u00f6rfarandet i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen.<\/p>\n

Det fel som intr\u00e4ffat i f\u00f6rfarandet ans\u00e5gs \u00e4nd\u00e5 inte med beaktande av omst\u00e4ndigheterna i fallet v\u00e4sentligt ha kunnat p\u00e5verka beslutet, varf\u00f6r ans\u00f6kan om \u00e5terbrytande avslogs.<\/p>\n

Universitetslagen 42 \u00a7 1 mom., 43 \u00a7 1 mom., 82 \u00a7 2 mom., 83 a \u00a7 1 mom., 84 \u00a7 3 mom.<\/p>\n

Diskrimineringslagen 27 \u00a7<\/h3>\n

F\u00f6rvaltningsprocesslagen 63 \u00a7 1 mom. 1 punkten<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Yliopiston dekaani oli p\u00e4\u00e4tt\u00e4nyt olla my\u00f6nt\u00e4m\u00e4tt\u00e4 A:lle uutta lis\u00e4aikaa t\u00e4m\u00e4n yliopistossa kesken olleiden opintojen suorittamiseen. Hallinto-oikeus oli hyl\u00e4nnyt A:n dekaanin p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksest\u00e4 tekem\u00e4n valituksen, koska yliopistolain 42 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 s\u00e4\u00e4detyt opiskeluajan jatkamisen edellytykset eiv\u00e4t t\u00e4yttyneet. Hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kseen liitetyn valitusosoituksen mukaan p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kseen sai hakea muutosta valittamalla korkeimpaan hallinto-oikeuteen vain, jos korkein hallinto-oikeus my\u00f6nt\u00e4\u00e4 valitusluvan. Yliopistolain 43 \u00a7:st\u00e4 ilmenee,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[28668],"kji_chamber":[31727],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[35189,46820,27421],"kji_language":[7746],"class_list":["post-805384","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-administrative-de-finlande","kji_chamber-sommaires","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-hallinto-oikeus","kji_keyword-paatokseen","kji_keyword-yliopiston","kji_language-multilingue"],"yoast_head":"\nKHO 15.12.2017\/6475 - Yliopiston p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KHO 15.12.2017\/6475 - Yliopiston p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Yliopiston dekaani oli p\u00e4\u00e4tt\u00e4nyt olla my\u00f6nt\u00e4m\u00e4tt\u00e4 A:lle uutta lis\u00e4aikaa t\u00e4m\u00e4n yliopistossa kesken olleiden opintojen suorittamiseen. Hallinto-oikeus oli hyl\u00e4nnyt A:n dekaanin p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksest\u00e4 tekem\u00e4n valituksen, koska yliopistolain 42 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 s\u00e4\u00e4detyt opiskeluajan jatkamisen edellytykset eiv\u00e4t t\u00e4yttyneet. Hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kseen liitetyn valitusosoituksen mukaan p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kseen sai hakea muutosta valittamalla korkeimpaan hallinto-oikeuteen vain, jos korkein hallinto-oikeus my\u00f6nt\u00e4\u00e4 valitusluvan. Yliopistolain 43 \u00a7:st\u00e4 ilmenee,...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"KHO 15.12.2017\\\/6475 - Yliopiston p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T12:00:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KHO 15.12.2017\\\/6475 – Yliopiston p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KHO 15.12.2017\/6475 - Yliopiston p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"KHO 15.12.2017\/6475 - Yliopiston p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s","og_description":"Yliopiston dekaani oli p\u00e4\u00e4tt\u00e4nyt olla my\u00f6nt\u00e4m\u00e4tt\u00e4 A:lle uutta lis\u00e4aikaa t\u00e4m\u00e4n yliopistossa kesken olleiden opintojen suorittamiseen. Hallinto-oikeus oli hyl\u00e4nnyt A:n dekaanin p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksest\u00e4 tekem\u00e4n valituksen, koska yliopistolain 42 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 s\u00e4\u00e4detyt opiskeluajan jatkamisen edellytykset eiv\u00e4t t\u00e4yttyneet. Hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kseen liitetyn valitusosoituksen mukaan p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kseen sai hakea muutosta valittamalla korkeimpaan hallinto-oikeuteen vain, jos korkein hallinto-oikeus my\u00f6nt\u00e4\u00e4 valitusluvan. Yliopistolain 43 \u00a7:st\u00e4 ilmenee,...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\/","name":"KHO 15.12.2017\/6475 - Yliopiston p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T12:00:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/kho-15-12-2017-6475-yliopiston-paatos-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KHO 15.12.2017\/6475 – Yliopiston p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/805384","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=805384"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=805384"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=805384"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=805384"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=805384"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=805384"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=805384"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=805384"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}