{"id":810536,"date":"2026-05-01T22:04:51","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T20:04:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T22:04:54","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T20:04:54","slug":"cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation, 26 octobre 2017, n\u00b0 1026-3865"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

N\u00b0 72 \/ 2017 du 26.10.2017.<\/p>\n

Num\u00e9ro 3865 du registre.<\/p>\n

Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-six octobre deux mille dix -sept.<\/p>\n

Composition:<\/p>\n

Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Nico EDON, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Carlo HEYARD, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Carole KERSCHEN, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel, Sandra KERSCH, avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n

Entre:<\/p>\n

la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme SOC1) , \u00e9tablie et ayant son si\u00e8ge social \u00e0 (\u2026), repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son conseil d\u2019administration, inscrite au registre de commerce et des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s sous le num\u00e9ro (\u2026),<\/p>\n

demanderesse en cassation,<\/p>\n

comparant par Ma\u00eetre Tom FELGEN , avocat \u00e0 la Cour, en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu,<\/p>\n

et:<\/p>\n

Ma\u00eetre Marguerite RIES, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, prise en sa qualit\u00e9 de curateur de la faillite de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme SOC2), anciennement s.\u00e0r.l. SOC3) , \u00e9tablie et ayant son si\u00e8ge social \u00e0 (\u2026), inscrite au registre de commerce et des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s sous le num\u00e9ro (\u2026), d\u00e9clar\u00e9e en \u00e9tat de faillite par jugement du tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8re commerciale, du (\u2026),<\/p>\n

d\u00e9fenderes se en cassation,<\/p>\n

comparant par Ma\u00eetre Bruno VIER, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu.<\/p>\n

——————————————————————————————————<\/p>\n

LA COUR DE CASSATION :<\/p>\n

Vu l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, num\u00e9ro 133\/16, rendu le 27 octobre 2016 sous le num\u00e9ro 42371 du r\u00f4le par la Cour d\u2019appel du Grand-Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, neuvi\u00e8me chambre, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8re civile ;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en cassation signifi\u00e9 le 12 d\u00e9cembre 2016 par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme SOC1) \u00e0 Ma\u00eetre Marguerite RIES, prise en sa qualit\u00e9 de curateur de la faillite de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e SOC2) , d\u00e9pos\u00e9 au greffe de la Cour le 30 d\u00e9cembre 2016 ;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse signifi\u00e9 le 13 f\u00e9vrier 2017 par Ma\u00eetre Marguerite RIES, agissant \u00e8s qualit\u00e9s, \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme SOC1) , d\u00e9pos\u00e9 au greffe de la Cour le 13 f\u00e9vrier 2017 ;<\/p>\n

Sur le rapport du conseiller Romain LUDOVICY et sur les conclusions de l\u2019avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Simone FLAMMANG ;<\/p>\n

Sur les faits :<\/p>\n

Attendu, selon l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, que le tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg avait condamn\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme SOC1) \u00e0 payer un certain montant \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e SOC2) en faillite et avait dit non fond\u00e9es deux demandes reconventionnelles de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC1) ; que la Cour d\u2019appel, apr\u00e8s avoir, par r\u00e9formation, dit fond\u00e9e l\u2019une des demandes reconventionnelles d\u2019 SOC1) et apr\u00e8s avoir rejet\u00e9 sa demande en compensation judiciaire des deux cr\u00e9ances en raison de la faillite de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC2) , a confirm\u00e9 la condamnation prononc\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019SOC1) et a fix\u00e9 la cr\u00e9ance de celle- ci \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard de la faillite ;<\/p>\n

Sur le premier moyen de cassation :<\/p>\n

tir\u00e9 \u00ab de la violation de l\u2019article 65 du Nouveau code de proc\u00e9dure civile et de l\u2019article 6, alin\u00e9a 1 er de la Convention europ\u00e9enne des droits de l\u2019homme,<\/p>\n

En ce que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 que la compensation est interdite en cas de faillite d\u2019une des parties au proc\u00e8s et qu\u2019elle s\u2019est ainsi prononc\u00e9e sur la question de la compensation entre cr\u00e9ances r\u00e9ciproques, sans avoir demand\u00e9 aux avocats des parties de prendre position quant \u00e0 ce moyen, c\u2019est-\u00e0-dire sans avoir respect\u00e9 le principe du contradictoire. \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Vu les articles 65 du Nouveau code de proc\u00e9dure civile et 6, alin\u00e9a 1 er , de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l\u2019homme et des libert\u00e9s fondamentales ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019en relevant d\u2019office le moyen de droit d\u2019une interdiction de la compensation en mati\u00e8re de faillite bas\u00e9 sur l\u2019article 444, alin\u00e9a 2, du Code de commerce et en y fondant leur d\u00e9cision sans avoir au pr\u00e9alable invit\u00e9 les parties \u00e0 pr\u00e9senter leurs observations, les juges d\u2019appel ont viol\u00e9 les dispositions vis\u00e9es au moyen ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il en suit que l\u2019arr\u00eat encourt la cassation ;<\/p>\n

Par ces motifs, et sans qu\u2019il y ait lieu de statuer sur le second moyen de cassation,<\/p>\n

casse et annule l\u2019arr\u00eat num\u00e9ro 133\/16 rendu le 27 octobre 2016 par la Cour d\u2019appel du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, neuvi\u00e8me chambre, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8re civile, sous le num\u00e9ro 42371 du r\u00f4le ;<\/p>\n

d\u00e9clare nuls et de nul effet ladite d\u00e9cision judiciaire et les actes qui s\u2019en sont suivis, remet les parties dans l\u2019\u00e9tat o\u00f9 elles se sont trouv\u00e9es avant l\u2019arr\u00eat cass\u00e9 et pour \u00eatre fait droit, les renvoie devant la Cour d\u2019appel, autrement compos\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

met les d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance en cassation \u00e0 charge de la masse de la faillite de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC2) et en ordonne la distraction au profit de Ma\u00eetre Tom FELGEN, sur ses affirmations de droit ;<\/p>\n

ordonne qu\u2019\u00e0 la diligence du procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral d\u2019Etat, le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat sera transcrit sur le registre de la Cour d\u2019appel et qu\u2019une mention renvoyant \u00e0 la transcription de l\u2019arr\u00eat sera consign\u00e9e en marge de la minute de l\u2019arr\u00eat annul\u00e9.<\/p>\n

La lecture du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite en la susdite audience publique par Monsieur le pr\u00e9sident Jean -Claude WIWINIUS, en pr\u00e9sence de Madame Sandra KERSCH, avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, et de Madame Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

N\u00b0 72 \/ 2017 du 26.10.2017. Num\u00e9ro 3865 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-six octobre deux mille dix -sept. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation,\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[8423],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,8598],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-810536","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-de-cassation","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-octobre","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation, 26 octobre 2017, n\u00b0 1026-3865 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation, 26 octobre 2017, n\u00b0 1026-3865\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"N\u00b0 72 \/ 2017 du 26.10.2017. Num\u00e9ro 3865 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-six octobre deux mille dix -sept. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation,\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-01T20:04:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 26 octobre 2017, n\u00b0 1026-3865 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T20:04:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-01T20:04:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 26 octobre 2017, n\u00b0 1026-3865\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation, 26 octobre 2017, n\u00b0 1026-3865 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation, 26 octobre 2017, n\u00b0 1026-3865","og_description":"N\u00b0 72 \/ 2017 du 26.10.2017. Num\u00e9ro 3865 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-six octobre deux mille dix -sept. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation,\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-01T20:04:54+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"5 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\/","name":"Cour de cassation, 26 octobre 2017, n\u00b0 1026-3865 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T20:04:51+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-01T20:04:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-26-octobre-2017-n-1026-3865\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation, 26 octobre 2017, n\u00b0 1026-3865"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/810536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=810536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=810536"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=810536"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=810536"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=810536"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=810536"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=810536"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=810536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}