{"id":812633,"date":"2026-05-02T02:59:21","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T00:59:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T02:59:21","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T00:59:21","slug":"acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 471\/25.2YRLSB-8 \u2013 2025-07-10"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: MARIA TERESA LOPES CATROLA. Sum?rio: (elaborado pela relatora &#8212; art. 663?, n? 7, do C?digo de Processo Civil) 1. Aperfei?oar conclus?es n?o ? eliminar par?grafos. E foi esta elimina??o que o recorrente fez, sem cuidar de sintetizar, como lhe foi pedido, o objeto do recurso. O seu ?nus ? o de sintetizar e n?o o de eliminar. 2. Para o cumprimento do ?nus da sintetiza??o na sequ?ncia do convite, deve partir-se do ?crit?rio da adequa??o?, n?o bastando apenas uma compara??o quantitativa entre a pe?a inicial e a subsequente, com redu??o das conclus?es.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrl.nsf\/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec\/a39719cd8e24655380258cdf002f320c?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: MARIA TERESA LOPES CATROLA. Sum?rio: (elaborado pela relatora &#8212; art. 663?, n? 7, do C?digo de Processo Civil) 1. Aperfei?oar conclus?es n?o ? eliminar par?grafos. E foi esta elimina??o que o recorrente fez, sem cuidar de sintetizar, como lhe foi pedido, o objeto do recurso. O seu ?nus ? o de sintetizar e n?o o de eliminar. 2. Para o cumprimento do ?nus da sintetiza??o na sequ?ncia do convite, deve partir-se do ?crit?rio da adequa??o?, n?o bastando apenas uma compara??o quantitativa entre a pe?a inicial e a subsequente, com redu??o das conclus?es.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[51416],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[8463],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,17729,7771,51417,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-812633","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa","kji_year-8463","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-lisboa","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-relacao","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 471\/25.2YRLSB-8 \u2013 2025-07-10 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 471\/25.2YRLSB-8 \u2013 2025-07-10\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: MARIA TERESA LOPES CATROLA. Sum?rio: (elaborado pela relatora - art. 663?, n? 7, do C?digo de Processo Civil) 1. Aperfei?oar conclus?es n?o ? eliminar par?grafos. E foi esta elimina??o que o recorrente fez, sem cuidar de sintetizar, como lhe foi pedido, o objeto do recurso. O seu ?nus ? o de sintetizar e n?o o de eliminar. 2. Para o cumprimento do ?nus da sintetiza??o na sequ?ncia do convite, deve partir-se do ?crit?rio da adequa??o?, n?o bastando apenas uma compara??o quantitativa entre a pe?a inicial e a subsequente, com redu??o das conclus?es.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 471\\\/25.2YRLSB-8 \u2013 2025-07-10 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T00:59:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 471\\\/25.2YRLSB-8 \u2013 2025-07-10\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 471\/25.2YRLSB-8 \u2013 2025-07-10 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 471\/25.2YRLSB-8 \u2013 2025-07-10","og_description":"Relator: MARIA TERESA LOPES CATROLA. Sum?rio: (elaborado pela relatora - art. 663?, n? 7, do C?digo de Processo Civil) 1. Aperfei?oar conclus?es n?o ? eliminar par?grafos. E foi esta elimina??o que o recorrente fez, sem cuidar de sintetizar, como lhe foi pedido, o objeto do recurso. O seu ?nus ? o de sintetizar e n?o o de eliminar. 2. Para o cumprimento do ?nus da sintetiza??o na sequ?ncia do convite, deve partir-se do ?crit?rio da adequa??o?, n?o bastando apenas uma compara??o quantitativa entre a pe?a inicial e a subsequente, com redu??o das conclus?es.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 471\/25.2YRLSB-8 \u2013 2025-07-10 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-02T00:59:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-471-25-2yrlsb-8-2025-07-10\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 471\/25.2YRLSB-8 \u2013 2025-07-10"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/812633","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=812633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=812633"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=812633"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=812633"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=812633"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=812633"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=812633"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=812633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}