{"id":815721,"date":"2026-05-02T12:34:38","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T10:34:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T12:34:42","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T10:34:42","slug":"cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation, 18 mai 2017, n\u00b0 0518-3788"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

N\u00b0 28 \/ 2017 p\u00e9nal. du 18.5.2017. Not. 26394\/ 07\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3788 du registre.<\/p>\n

La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l'organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, dix -huit mai deux mille dix -sept,<\/p>\n

sur le pourvoi de :<\/p>\n

A), n\u00e9e le (\u2026) \u00e0 (\u2026), demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n

pr\u00e9venue et d\u00e9fenderesse au civil,<\/p>\n

demanderesse en cassation,<\/p>\n

comparant par Ma\u00eetre Gaston VOGEL, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg, en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu,<\/p>\n

en pr\u00e9sence du Minist\u00e8re p ublic<\/p>\n

et de :<\/p>\n

B), demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n

demanderesse au civil,<\/p>\n

d\u00e9fenderes se en cassation,<\/p>\n

l\u2019arr\u00eat qui suit :<\/p>\n

=======================================================<\/p>\n

LA COUR DE CASSATION :<\/p>\n

Vu l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 rendu le 14 juin 2016 sous le num\u00e9ro 356\/16 V . par la Cour d\u2019appel du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, cinqui\u00e8me chambre, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8re correctionnelle ;<\/p>\n

Vu le pourvoi en cassation, au p\u00e9nal et au civil, form\u00e9 le 11 juillet 2016 par Ma\u00eetre Virginie MERTZ, en remplacement de Ma\u00eetre Gaston VOGEL, pour et au nom de A) , par d\u00e9claration au greffe de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice ;<\/p>\n

2 Vu le m\u00e9moire en cassation signifi\u00e9 le 3 ao\u00fbt 2016 par A) \u00e0 B), et d\u00e9pos\u00e9 au greffe de la Cour le 5 ao\u00fbt 2016 ;<\/p>\n

Sur le rapport du pr\u00e9sident Jean -Claude WIWINIUS et sur les conclusions de l\u2019avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Serge WAGNER ;<\/p>\n

Sur les faits :<\/p>\n

Attendu, selon l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, que le tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg avait condamn\u00e9 A) du chef d\u2019infractions \u00e0 l\u2019article 379 bis, alin\u00e9as 1, 3, 4 et 5 du Code p\u00e9nal \u00e0 une peine d\u2019emprisonnement et \u00e0 une peine d\u2019amende ; qu\u2019au civil, A) avait \u00e9t\u00e9 condamn\u00e9e au paiement de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats \u00e0 la partie civile B) ; que la Cour d\u2019appel, apr\u00e8s avoir rejet\u00e9 les moyens tir\u00e9s de la nullit\u00e9 du jugement de premi\u00e8re instance pour violation des droits de la d\u00e9fense, a r\u00e9form\u00e9 le jugement en r\u00e9duisant la peine d\u2019emprisonnement et la peine d\u2019amende et en assortissant l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de l\u2019int\u00e9gralit\u00e9 de la peine d\u2019emprisonnement prononc\u00e9e du sursis ; que, pour le surplus, la Cour d\u2019appel a confirm\u00e9 le jugement de premi\u00e8re instance au p\u00e9nal et au civil ;<\/p>\n

Sur l\u2019unique moyen de cassation :<\/p>\n

tir\u00e9 \u00ab de la violation combin\u00e9e de l'article 187 du Code d\u2019instruction criminelle et de l'article 6 de la Convention Europ\u00e9enne des Droits de l\u2019Homme ;<\/p>\n

en ce que la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 que l\u2019opposition \u00e0 un jugement par d\u00e9faut avait un caract\u00e8re absolu, de telle sorte que l\u2019audition d\u2019un t\u00e9moin \u00e9tait admise dans l\u2019instance d\u2019opposition malgr\u00e9 le fait qu\u2019il s\u2019\u00e9tait constitu\u00e9 partie civile dans le cadre de la proc\u00e9dure ayant conduit au jugement rendu par d\u00e9faut ;<\/p>\n

aux motifs que << l\u2019effet extinctif de l\u2019opposition a justement pour effet de \u2019\u2019d\u00e9faire ce qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 fait\u2019\u2019 et la constitution de partie civile dispara\u00eet par le fait de l\u2019opposition, la victime d\u2019une infraction pouvant alors reprendre la qualit\u00e9 de t\u00e9moin >> ;<\/p>\n

alors que l\u2019opposition an\u00e9antit la condamnation et non la qualit\u00e9 irr\u00e9versible de partie civile prise par le t\u00e9moin, de telle sorte qu\u2019en statuant ainsi la Cour d\u2019appel a viol\u00e9 l\u2019article 187 du Code d\u2019instruction criminelle et l\u2019article 6 de la Convention Europ\u00e9enne des Droits de l\u2019homme \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que, dans le d\u00e9veloppement du moyen, la demanderesse en cassation pr\u00e9cise \u00ab qu\u2019en d\u00e9cidant ainsi de rejeter le moyen de nullit\u00e9 du jugement portant sur l\u2019admission du t\u00e9moignage de la dame B) apr\u00e8s sa constitution de partie civile dans l\u2019instance ayant abouti au jugement par d\u00e9faut, la Cour d\u2019appel a viol\u00e9 les r\u00e8gles proc\u00e9durales d\u2019opposition. \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019il r\u00e9sulte du jugement de premi\u00e8re instance en question que le tribunal avait finalement d\u00e9cid\u00e9 de ne pas prendre en compte le t\u00e9moignage de B), \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 qu\u2019il \u00e9tait \u00ab frapp\u00e9 d\u2019une plainte \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que la demanderesse en cassation critique ainsi une motivation de la juridiction d\u2019appel qui \u00e9tait de ce fait devenue th\u00e9orique et superflue et qui \u00e9tait d\u00e8s lors sans incidence sur la condamnation intervenue \u00e0 son encontre ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il en suit que le moyen est inop\u00e9rant ;<\/p>\n

Par ces motifs,<\/p>\n

rejette le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n

condamne la demanderesse en cassation aux frais de l\u2019instance en cassation, ceux expos\u00e9s par le Minist\u00e8re public \u00e9tant liquid\u00e9s \u00e0 14 euros.<\/p>\n

Ainsi jug\u00e9 par la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg en son audience publique du jeudi, dix -huit mai deux mille dix-sept, \u00e0 la Cit\u00e9 Judiciaire, B\u00e2timent CR, Plateau du St. Esprit, compos\u00e9e de :<\/p>\n

Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Carlo HEYARD, c onseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Alain THORN, premier conseiller \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel, Elisabeth WEYRICH, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel, Myl\u00e8ne REGENWETTER, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel,<\/p>\n

qui ont sign\u00e9 le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat avec le greffier Viviane PROBST.<\/p>\n

La lecture du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite en la susdite audience publique par Monsieur le pr\u00e9sident Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, en pr\u00e9sence de Madame Marie- Jeanne KAPPWEILER, premier avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, et de Madame Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

N\u00b0 28 \/ 2017 p\u00e9nal. du 18.5.2017. Not. 26394\/ 07\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3788 du registre. La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l’organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, dix -huit\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[8423],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,8425],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-815721","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-de-cassation","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-penal","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation, 18 mai 2017, n\u00b0 0518-3788 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation, 18 mai 2017, n\u00b0 0518-3788\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"N\u00b0 28 \/ 2017 p\u00e9nal. du 18.5.2017. Not. 26394\/ 07\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3788 du registre. La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l'organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, dix -huit\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-02T10:34:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 18 mai 2017, n\u00b0 0518-3788 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T10:34:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-02T10:34:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 18 mai 2017, n\u00b0 0518-3788\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation, 18 mai 2017, n\u00b0 0518-3788 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation, 18 mai 2017, n\u00b0 0518-3788","og_description":"N\u00b0 28 \/ 2017 p\u00e9nal. du 18.5.2017. Not. 26394\/ 07\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3788 du registre. La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l'organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, dix -huit\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-02T10:34:42+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"5 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\/","name":"Cour de cassation, 18 mai 2017, n\u00b0 0518-3788 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-02T10:34:38+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-02T10:34:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-18-mai-2017-n-0518-3788\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation, 18 mai 2017, n\u00b0 0518-3788"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/815721","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=815721"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=815721"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=815721"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=815721"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=815721"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=815721"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=815721"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=815721"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}