{"id":817026,"date":"2026-05-02T16:22:37","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T14:22:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T16:22:37","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T14:22:37","slug":"acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 187\/21.9T8CSC.L1-2 \u2013 2024-12-19"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: JO?O PAULO RAPOSO. Sum?rio (da responsabilidade do relator): I. ? l?cito ao juiz, ao abrigo do seu poder de gest?o processual, impor ?s partes o dever de impulsionarem os autos, mesmo que estes se encontrem numa fase processual em que o ato tipicamente devido seja da compet?ncia daquele; II. Uma vez que a gest?o processual constitui um poder vinculado, ou poder-dever, sindic?vel por via de recurso, para que o juiz possa impor ?s partes tal ?nus de impulsionarem os autos deve fundamentar devidamente as raz?es que sustentam a sua decis?o, de facto e direito; III. Fazendo o juiz uma simples advert?ncia gen?rica de deser??o da inst?ncia ante sil?ncio das partes, tal decis?o n?o constitui um adequado exerc?cio das faculdades de gest?o processual e, consequentemente, era ao juiz que incumbia a pr?tica do ato tipicamente esperado na tramita??o processual.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrl.nsf\/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec\/caca6997eb1a578080258c0d0040fe98?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: JO?O PAULO RAPOSO. Sum?rio (da responsabilidade do relator): I. ? l?cito ao juiz, ao abrigo do seu poder de gest?o processual, impor ?s partes o dever de impulsionarem os autos, mesmo que estes se encontrem numa fase processual em que o ato tipicamente devido seja da compet?ncia daquele; II. Uma vez que a gest?o processual constitui um poder vinculado, ou poder-dever, sindic?vel por via de recurso, para que o juiz possa impor ?s partes tal ?nus de impulsionarem os autos deve fundamentar devidamente as raz?es que sustentam a sua decis?o, de facto e direito; III. Fazendo o juiz uma simples advert?ncia gen?rica de deser??o da inst?ncia ante sil?ncio das partes, tal decis?o n?o constitui um adequado exerc?cio das faculdades de gest?o processual e, consequentemente, era ao juiz que incumbia a pr?tica do ato tipicamente esperado na tramita??o processual.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[51416],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[8677],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,17729,7771,51417,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-817026","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa","kji_year-8677","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-lisboa","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-relacao","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 187\/21.9T8CSC.L1-2 \u2013 2024-12-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 187\/21.9T8CSC.L1-2 \u2013 2024-12-19\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: JO?O PAULO RAPOSO. Sum?rio (da responsabilidade do relator): I. ? l?cito ao juiz, ao abrigo do seu poder de gest?o processual, impor ?s partes o dever de impulsionarem os autos, mesmo que estes se encontrem numa fase processual em que o ato tipicamente devido seja da compet?ncia daquele; II. Uma vez que a gest?o processual constitui um poder vinculado, ou poder-dever, sindic?vel por via de recurso, para que o juiz possa impor ?s partes tal ?nus de impulsionarem os autos deve fundamentar devidamente as raz?es que sustentam a sua decis?o, de facto e direito; III. Fazendo o juiz uma simples advert?ncia gen?rica de deser??o da inst?ncia ante sil?ncio das partes, tal decis?o n?o constitui um adequado exerc?cio das faculdades de gest?o processual e, consequentemente, era ao juiz que incumbia a pr?tica do ato tipicamente esperado na tramita??o processual.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 187\\\/21.9T8CSC.L1-2 \u2013 2024-12-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T14:22:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 187\\\/21.9T8CSC.L1-2 \u2013 2024-12-19\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 187\/21.9T8CSC.L1-2 \u2013 2024-12-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 187\/21.9T8CSC.L1-2 \u2013 2024-12-19","og_description":"Relator: JO?O PAULO RAPOSO. Sum?rio (da responsabilidade do relator): I. ? l?cito ao juiz, ao abrigo do seu poder de gest?o processual, impor ?s partes o dever de impulsionarem os autos, mesmo que estes se encontrem numa fase processual em que o ato tipicamente devido seja da compet?ncia daquele; II. Uma vez que a gest?o processual constitui um poder vinculado, ou poder-dever, sindic?vel por via de recurso, para que o juiz possa impor ?s partes tal ?nus de impulsionarem os autos deve fundamentar devidamente as raz?es que sustentam a sua decis?o, de facto e direito; III. Fazendo o juiz uma simples advert?ncia gen?rica de deser??o da inst?ncia ante sil?ncio das partes, tal decis?o n?o constitui um adequado exerc?cio das faculdades de gest?o processual e, consequentemente, era ao juiz que incumbia a pr?tica do ato tipicamente esperado na tramita??o processual.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 187\/21.9T8CSC.L1-2 \u2013 2024-12-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-02T14:22:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-187-21-9t8csc-l1-2-2024-12-19\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 187\/21.9T8CSC.L1-2 \u2013 2024-12-19"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/817026","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=817026"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=817026"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=817026"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=817026"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=817026"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=817026"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=817026"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=817026"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}