{"id":819753,"date":"2026-05-03T00:12:24","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T22:12:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\/"},"modified":"2026-05-03T00:12:27","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T22:12:27","slug":"cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation, 2 mars 2017, n\u00b0 0302-3758"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>N\u00b0 21 \/ 2017 du 2.3.2017.<\/p>\n<p>Num\u00e9ro 3758 du registre.<\/p>\n<p>Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, deux mars deux mille dix-sept.<\/p>\n<p>Composition:<\/p>\n<p>Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Nico EDON, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Carlo HEYARD, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Marianne EICHER, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel, Simone FLAMMANG, avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n<p>Entre:<\/p>\n<p>A), demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n<p>demanderesse en cassation,<\/p>\n<p>comparant par Ma\u00eetre Eyal GRUMBERG, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu, et:<\/p>\n<p>1) B), demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n<p>2) C), demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n<p>3) D), demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n<p>d\u00e9fenderesse s en cassation,<\/p>\n<p>comparant par Ma\u00eetre Marc MODERT , avocat \u00e0 la Cour, en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu.<\/p>\n<p>=======================================================<\/p>\n<p>2 LA COUR DE CASSATION :<\/p>\n<p>Vu l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, rendu le 2 mars 2016, et non le 2 mars 2015, comme indiqu\u00e9 erron\u00e9ment dans l\u2019arr\u00eat, sous le num\u00e9ro 46\/16- II-CIV, par la Cour d\u2019appel, deuxi\u00e8me chambre, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8re civile ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu le m\u00e9moire en cassation signifi\u00e9 le 4 mai 2016 par A) \u00e0 B), \u00e0 C) et \u00e0 D), d\u00e9pos\u00e9 au greffe de la Cour le 18 mai 2016 ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu le m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse signifi\u00e9 le 30 juin 2016 par B), C) et D) \u00e0 A), d\u00e9pos\u00e9 au greffe de la Cour le 1 er juillet 2016 ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le rapport du conseiller Carlo HEYARD et sur les conclusions du premier avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Jeanne GUILLAUME ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur la recevabilit\u00e9 du pourvoi qui est contest\u00e9e :<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que l\u2019arr\u00eat entrepris a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 non fond\u00e9 l\u2019appel de A) dirig\u00e9 contre un jugement du tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg du 11 novembre 2009 qui avait rejet\u00e9 ses demandes en rapport de lib\u00e9ralit\u00e9s di rig\u00e9es contre ses s\u0153urs B) , C) et D) et avait condamn\u00e9 A) \u00e0 payer \u00e0 chacune des parties C) et B) une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 800 euros ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que les parties d\u00e9fenderesses en cassation concluent \u00e0 l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 du recours en cassation au motif que la demanderesse en cassation aurait acquiesc\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019arr\u00eat entrepris par le fait de payer le 7 avril 2016 les indemnit\u00e9s de proc\u00e9dure auxquelles elle avait \u00e9t\u00e9 condamn\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu qu\u2019il r\u00e9sulte effectivement des pi\u00e8ces vers\u00e9es que A) a, par virement du 7 avril 2016, pay\u00e9 les indemnit\u00e9s de proc\u00e9dure ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que le pourvoi en cassation n\u2019\u00e9tant pas suspensif en mati\u00e8re civile, l\u2019ex\u00e9cution, m\u00eame sans r\u00e9serves , d\u2019un arr\u00eat ne vaut acquiescement que s\u2019il r\u00e9sulte des circonstances dans lesquelles elle a eu lieu que celui qui ex\u00e9cute a, sans \u00e9quivoque, manifest\u00e9 sa volont\u00e9 d\u2019acquiescer ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu qu\u2019en l\u2019occurrence, l\u2019ex\u00e9cution spontan\u00e9e de l\u2019arr\u00eat, hors de toute demande aff\u00e9rente des parties gagnantes , dans un bref d\u00e9lai apr\u00e8s que l\u2019arr\u00eat avait \u00e9t\u00e9 rendu, \u00e9tablit, \u00e0 l\u2019abri de tout doute, qu\u2019il y avait intention dans le chef de A) de mettre d\u00e9finitivement fin au litige ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que A) ayant ainsi acquiesc\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019arr\u00eat d\u2019appel, celui-ci est devenu irr\u00e9vocable ;<\/p>\n<p>Qu\u2019il en suit que le pourvoi en cassation est i rrecevable ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur la demande en allocation d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure :<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que la demanderesse en cassation \u00e9tant \u00e0 condamner aux d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance en cassation, sa demande en allocation d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure est \u00e0 rejeter ;<\/p>\n<p>Par ces motifs,<\/p>\n<p>d\u00e9clare le pourvoi en cassation irrecevable ;<\/p>\n<p>rejette la demande en allocation d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure ;<\/p>\n<p>condamne la demanderesse en cassation aux d\u00e9pens de l&#039;instance en cassation avec distraction au profit de Ma\u00eetre Marc MODERT , sur ses affirmations de droit.<\/p>\n<p>La lecture du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite en la susdite audience publique par Monsieur le pr\u00e9sident Jean -Claude WIWINIUS, en pr\u00e9sence de M adame Simone FLAMMANG, avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, et de Madame Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/data.public.lu\/fr\/datasets\/cour-de-cassation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/download.data.public.lu\/resources\/cour-de-cassation\/20240806-144935\/20170302-3758a-accessible.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>N\u00b0 21 \/ 2017 du 2.3.2017. Num\u00e9ro 3758 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, deux mars deux mille dix-sept. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Nico\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[8423],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-819753","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-de-cassation","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.6 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation, 2 mars 2017, n\u00b0 0302-3758 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation, 2 mars 2017, n\u00b0 0302-3758\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"N\u00b0 21 \/ 2017 du 2.3.2017. Num\u00e9ro 3758 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, deux mars deux mille dix-sept. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Nico\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-02T22:12:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 2 mars 2017, n\u00b0 0302-3758 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T22:12:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-02T22:12:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 2 mars 2017, n\u00b0 0302-3758\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation, 2 mars 2017, n\u00b0 0302-3758 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation, 2 mars 2017, n\u00b0 0302-3758","og_description":"N\u00b0 21 \/ 2017 du 2.3.2017. Num\u00e9ro 3758 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, deux mars deux mille dix-sept. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Nico\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-02T22:12:27+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\/","name":"Cour de cassation, 2 mars 2017, n\u00b0 0302-3758 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-02T22:12:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-02T22:12:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-2-mars-2017-n-0302-3758\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation, 2 mars 2017, n\u00b0 0302-3758"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/819753","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=819753"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=819753"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=819753"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=819753"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=819753"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=819753"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=819753"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=819753"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}