{"id":821544,"date":"2026-05-03T05:01:28","date_gmt":"2026-05-03T03:01:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\/"},"modified":"2026-05-03T05:01:28","modified_gmt":"2026-05-03T03:01:28","slug":"acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 12\/15.0F9LSB.L1-5 \u2013 2024-04-09"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: MAFALDA SEQUINHO DOS SANTOS. I?A senten?a que n?o foi reduzida a escrito e meramente lida ?por apontamento? ? juridicamente inexistente, com a consequente nulidade insan?vel da sess?o de julgamento onde tais factos ocorreram que dever? repetir-se com cumprimento das exig?ncias referentes ? elabora??o, leitura e subsequente dep?sito. II?Validamente, o recorrente apenas foi sujeito a uma audi?ncia de julgamento e a uma senten?a condenat?ria (pois que os anteriores atos n?o mant?m qualquer validade jur?dica) n?o se verificando, por isso, a viola??o do princ?pio ne bis in idem. III?N?o exige o tipo legal do crime de receta??o que o agente tenha conhecimento das circunst?ncias em que foram praticados os crimes de furto, bastando o conhecimento da proveni?ncia il?cita do bem. (Sum?rio da responsabilidade da relatora)<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: MAFALDA SEQUINHO DOS SANTOS. I?A senten?a que n?o foi reduzida a escrito e meramente lida ?por apontamento? ? juridicamente inexistente, com a consequente nulidade insan?vel da sess?o de julgamento onde tais factos ocorreram que dever? repetir-se com cumprimento das exig?ncias referentes ? elabora??o, leitura e subsequente dep?sito. II?Validamente, o recorrente apenas foi sujeito a uma audi?ncia de julgamento e a uma senten?a condenat?ria (pois que os anteriores atos n?o mant?m qualquer validade jur?dica) n?o se verificando, por isso, a viola??o do princ?pio ne bis in idem. III?N?o exige o tipo legal do crime de receta??o que o agente tenha conhecimento das circunst?ncias em que foram praticados os crimes de furto, bastando o conhecimento da proveni?ncia il?cita do bem. (Sum?rio da responsabilidade da relatora)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[51416],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[8677],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7772,17729,7771,51417,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-821544","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa","kji_year-8677","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-lisboa","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-relacao","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 12\/15.0F9LSB.L1-5 \u2013 2024-04-09 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 12\/15.0F9LSB.L1-5 \u2013 2024-04-09\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: MAFALDA SEQUINHO DOS SANTOS. I?A senten?a que n?o foi reduzida a escrito e meramente lida ?por apontamento? ? juridicamente inexistente, com a consequente nulidade insan?vel da sess?o de julgamento onde tais factos ocorreram que dever? repetir-se com cumprimento das exig?ncias referentes ? elabora??o, leitura e subsequente dep?sito. II?Validamente, o recorrente apenas foi sujeito a uma audi?ncia de julgamento e a uma senten?a condenat?ria (pois que os anteriores atos n?o mant?m qualquer validade jur?dica) n?o se verificando, por isso, a viola??o do princ?pio ne bis in idem. III?N?o exige o tipo legal do crime de receta??o que o agente tenha conhecimento das circunst?ncias em que foram praticados os crimes de furto, bastando o conhecimento da proveni?ncia il?cita do bem. (Sum?rio da responsabilidade da relatora)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 12\\\/15.0F9LSB.L1-5 \u2013 2024-04-09 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-03T03:01:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 12\\\/15.0F9LSB.L1-5 \u2013 2024-04-09\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 12\/15.0F9LSB.L1-5 \u2013 2024-04-09 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 12\/15.0F9LSB.L1-5 \u2013 2024-04-09","og_description":"Relator: MAFALDA SEQUINHO DOS SANTOS. I?A senten?a que n?o foi reduzida a escrito e meramente lida ?por apontamento? ? juridicamente inexistente, com a consequente nulidade insan?vel da sess?o de julgamento onde tais factos ocorreram que dever? repetir-se com cumprimento das exig?ncias referentes ? elabora??o, leitura e subsequente dep?sito. II?Validamente, o recorrente apenas foi sujeito a uma audi?ncia de julgamento e a uma senten?a condenat?ria (pois que os anteriores atos n?o mant?m qualquer validade jur?dica) n?o se verificando, por isso, a viola??o do princ?pio ne bis in idem. III?N?o exige o tipo legal do crime de receta??o que o agente tenha conhecimento das circunst?ncias em que foram praticados os crimes de furto, bastando o conhecimento da proveni?ncia il?cita do bem. (Sum?rio da responsabilidade da relatora)","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"1 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 12\/15.0F9LSB.L1-5 \u2013 2024-04-09 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-03T03:01:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-12-15-0f9lsb-l1-5-2024-04-09\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 12\/15.0F9LSB.L1-5 \u2013 2024-04-09"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/821544","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=821544"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=821544"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=821544"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=821544"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=821544"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=821544"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=821544"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=821544"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}