{"id":828320,"date":"2026-05-04T00:20:36","date_gmt":"2026-05-03T22:20:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\/"},"modified":"2026-05-04T00:20:39","modified_gmt":"2026-05-03T22:20:39","slug":"cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation, 13 octobre 2016, n\u00b0 1013-3714"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

1<\/p>\n

N\u00b0 41 \/ 2016 p\u00e9nal. du 13.10.2016. Not. 21002\/1 5\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3714 du registre.<\/p>\n

La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l'organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, treize octobre deux mille sei ze,<\/p>\n

sur le pourvoi de :<\/p>\n

X, n\u00e9 le (\u2026) \u00e0 (\u2026), demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n

pr\u00e9venu et d\u00e9fendeur au civil, demandeur en cassation,<\/p>\n

comparant par Ma\u00eetre Antonio RAFFA, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu,<\/p>\n

en pr\u00e9sence du Minist\u00e8re public<\/p>\n

et de :<\/p>\n

1) A, n\u00e9 le (\u2026), et<\/p>\n

2) B, n\u00e9e le (\u2026), les deux demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n

demandeurs au civil, d\u00e9fendeurs en cassation,<\/p>\n

comparant par Ma\u00eetre Jean-Paul NOESEN, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu,<\/p>\n

l\u2019arr\u00eat qui suit :<\/p>\n

——————————————————————————————————<\/p>\n

LA COUR DE CASSATION :<\/p>\n

Vu le jugement attaqu\u00e9 rendu le 18 d\u00e9cembre 2015 sous le num\u00e9ro 3650\/2015 par le tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg, treizi\u00e8me chambre, si\u00e9geant en instance d\u2019appel en mati\u00e8re de police ;<\/p>\n

Vu le pourvoi en cassation d\u00e9clar\u00e9 le 15 janvier 2016 par Ma\u00eetre Antonio RAFFA pour et au nom d\u2019 X au greffe du tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg ;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en cassation signifi\u00e9 le 12 f\u00e9vrier 2016 par X aux parties civiles A et B, d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le m\u00eame jour par Ma\u00eetre Antonio RAFFA au greffe d u tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg ;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse signifi\u00e9 le 26 f\u00e9vrier 2016 par A et B \u00e0 X, d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le 3 mars 2016 par Ma\u00eetre Jean -Paul NOESEN au greffe du tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg ;<\/p>\n

Sur le rapport du conseiller Romain LUDOVICY et les conclusions de l\u2019avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Marc HARPES ;<\/p>\n

Sur les faits :<\/p>\n

Attendu, selon le jugement attaqu\u00e9, que le tribunal de police de Luxembourg avait condamn\u00e9 X en tant que responsable d\u2019un d\u00e9bit de boissons alcooliques \u00e0 deux amendes de police du chef de non- respect des heures d\u2019ouverture et de bruits et tapages nocturnes, ainsi qu\u2019au paiement de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats aux parties civiles A — B ; que le tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg, si\u00e9geant en instance d\u2019appel en mati\u00e8re de police, a confirm\u00e9 le jugement entrepris tant au p\u00e9nal qu\u2019au civil ;<\/p>\n

Sur les deux moyens de cassation r\u00e9unis :<\/p>\n

le premier :<\/p>\n

\u00ab La nullit\u00e9 du jugement pour violation de la loi par fausse interpr\u00e9tation de la loi du 10 ao\u00fbt 1915 concernant les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s commerciales, sinon de la fausse application de cette derni\u00e8re,<\/p>\n

En ce que<\/p>\n

Le jugement de la chambre correctionnelle a retenu en tant que responsable du d\u00e9bit de boissons alcooliques << Caf\u00e9 am Duerf >> X , qu\u2019il confirma au civil et au p\u00e9nal le jugement entrepris.<\/p>\n

Alors que<\/p>\n

Le g\u00e9rant est seul responsable de la gestion d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e, que la notion de responsable ne figure pas dans le lexique des termes juridiques Dalloz. \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

le second :<\/p>\n

\u00ab En ce que<\/p>\n

X n\u2019est pas g\u00e9rant au sens de la loi << cabarets >><\/p>\n

Alors que<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il r\u00e9sulte de la taxe annuelle de cabaretage 2015 que jusqu\u2019au 30 septembre 2015 C \u00e9tait responsable et qu\u2019elle se trouvait au caf\u00e9 << Am Due rf >> le jour o\u00f9 les faits incrimin\u00e9s ont eu lieu. \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019il ne r\u00e9sulte ni du jugement attaqu\u00e9 ni d\u2019aucun autre \u00e9l\u00e9ment du dossier soumis \u00e0 la Cour de cassation que l\u2019actuel demandeur en cassation ait contest\u00e9 devant les juges d\u2019appel l\u2019imputabilit\u00e9 des infractions retenues \u00e0 sa charge ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il s\u2019ensuit que les moyens sont nouveaux et, en ce qu\u2019ils sont m\u00e9lang\u00e9s de fait et de droit, irrecevables ;<\/p>\n

Par ces motifs :<\/p>\n

rejette le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n

condamne le demandeur en cassation aux frais de l\u2019instance en cassation, ceux expos\u00e9s par le Minist\u00e8re public \u00e9tant liquid\u00e9s \u00e0 1,75 euros.<\/p>\n

Ainsi jug\u00e9 par la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg en son audience publique du jeudi, treize octobre deux mille seize, \u00e0 la Cit\u00e9 Judiciaire, B\u00e2timent CR, Plateau du St. Esprit, compos\u00e9e de :<\/p>\n

Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Carlo HEYARD, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation , Rita BIEL, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel, Marie MACKEL, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel,<\/p>\n

qui ont sign\u00e9 le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat avec le greffier Viviane PROBST, \u00e0 l\u2019exception du conseiller Carlo HEYARD, qui se trouvait dans l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 de signer.<\/p>\n

4 La lecture du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite en la susdite audience publique par Monsieur le pr\u00e9sident Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, en pr\u00e9sence de M onsieur Marc HARPES, avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral , et de M adame Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

1 N\u00b0 41 \/ 2016 p\u00e9nal. du 13.10.2016. Not. 21002\/1 5\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3714 du registre. La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l’organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, treize\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[8423],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[61603],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,8598],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-828320","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-de-cassation","kji_year-61603","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-octobre","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation, 13 octobre 2016, n\u00b0 1013-3714 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation, 13 octobre 2016, n\u00b0 1013-3714\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"1 N\u00b0 41 \/ 2016 p\u00e9nal. du 13.10.2016. Not. 21002\/1 5\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3714 du registre. La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l'organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, treize\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-03T22:20:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 13 octobre 2016, n\u00b0 1013-3714 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-03T22:20:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-03T22:20:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 13 octobre 2016, n\u00b0 1013-3714\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation, 13 octobre 2016, n\u00b0 1013-3714 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation, 13 octobre 2016, n\u00b0 1013-3714","og_description":"1 N\u00b0 41 \/ 2016 p\u00e9nal. du 13.10.2016. Not. 21002\/1 5\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3714 du registre. La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l'organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, treize\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-03T22:20:39+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"4 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\/","name":"Cour de cassation, 13 octobre 2016, n\u00b0 1013-3714 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-03T22:20:36+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-03T22:20:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-13-octobre-2016-n-1013-3714\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation, 13 octobre 2016, n\u00b0 1013-3714"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/828320","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=828320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=828320"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=828320"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=828320"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=828320"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=828320"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=828320"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=828320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}