{"id":836051,"date":"2026-05-05T00:18:36","date_gmt":"2026-05-04T22:18:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\/"},"modified":"2026-05-05T00:18:40","modified_gmt":"2026-05-04T22:18:40","slug":"cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation, 16 juin 2016, n\u00b0 0616-3747"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>N\u00b0 28 \/ 2016 p\u00e9nal. du 16.06.2016. Not. 23398\/09\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3747 du registre.<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l&#039;organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, seize juin deux mille seize,<\/p>\n<p>l\u2019arr\u00eat qui suit :<\/p>\n<p>E n t r e :<\/p>\n<p>X, (\u2026), demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n<p>demandeur en relev\u00e9 de la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance r\u00e9sultant de l\u2019expiration d\u2019un d\u00e9lai imparti pour agir en justice,<\/p>\n<p>et le Minist\u00e8re public<\/p>\n<p>en pr\u00e9sence de :<\/p>\n<p>Y, (\u2026), demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026).<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>LA COUR DE CASSATION :<\/p>\n<p>Ou\u00ef en chambre du conseil Ma\u00eetre Laurent LIMPACH, en remplacement de Ma\u00eetre Alain GROSS, pour et au nom d\u2019X, Ma\u00eetre Alex PENNING pour et au nom de Y et Monsieur l\u2019avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Serge WAGNER ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu l\u2019arr\u00eat rendu le 27 janvier 2016 sous le num\u00e9ro 56\/16 X par la Cour d\u2019appel du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, dixi\u00e8me chambre, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8re correctionnelle,<\/p>\n<p>Vu le pourvoi en cassation d\u00e9clar\u00e9 le 23 f\u00e9vrier 2016 au greffe de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice par Ma\u00eetre Alex PENNING pour et au nom de Y ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu le m\u00e9moire en cassation signifi\u00e9 le 22 mars 2016 par Y \u00e0 X, d\u00e9pos\u00e9 au greffe de la Cour le 23 mars 2016 ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu le m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse signifi\u00e9 le 19 avril 2016 par X \u00e0 Y, d\u00e9pos\u00e9 au greffe de la Cour en copie le 22 avril 2016 et en original le 25 avril 2016 ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu la requ\u00eate en relev\u00e9 de d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance d\u00e9pos\u00e9e au greffe de la Cour le 25 avril 2016 par Ma\u00eetre Alain GROSS, pour et au nom d\u2019 X, annex\u00e9e \u00e0 la pr\u00e9sente d\u00e9cision ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que le requ\u00e9rant demande \u00e0 \u00eatre relev\u00e9 de la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance encourue du fait du non- d\u00e9p\u00f4t dans le d\u00e9lai l\u00e9gal du m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que le requ\u00e9rant fait valoir qu\u2019il \u00ab a fait signifier son m\u00e9moire en r\u00e9ponse end\u00e9ans les d\u00e9lais pr\u00e9vus par la loi modifi\u00e9e du 18 f\u00e9vrier 1885 sur les pourvois et la proc\u00e9dure en cassation au sieur Y, \u00e0 savoir en date du 19 avril 2016 ; que l\u2019huissier de justice Guy ENGEL a, de suite apr\u00e8s l\u2019enregistrement de l\u2019ac te de signification le 20 avril 2016, envoy\u00e9 l\u2019original de l\u2019acte par poste \u00e0 l\u2019adresse de Maitre Alain GROSS pour lui permettre de le d\u00e9poser au greffe end\u00e9ans le d\u00e9lai d\u2019un mois \u00e0 partir de la signification du m\u00e9moire en cassation , que n\u00e9anmoins, pour des raisons li\u00e9es \u00e0 la poste le courrier contenant l\u2019original de l\u2019acte de signification a seulement \u00e9t\u00e9 re\u00e7u en date du lundi 25 avril 2016 \u00bb ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que les \u00ab raisons li\u00e9es \u00e0 la poste \u00bb invoqu\u00e9es, ne constituent pas une impossibilit\u00e9 d\u2019agir au sens de l\u2019article 1 er de la loi du 22 d\u00e9cembre 1986 relative au relev\u00e9 de la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance r\u00e9sultant de l\u2019expiration d\u2019un d\u00e9lai imparti pour agir en justice ; que le requ\u00e9rant n\u2019\u00e9tablit en effet pas en quoi il lui aurait \u00e9t\u00e9 impossible de r\u00e9cup\u00e9rer, autrement que par la transmission par la voie postale, l\u2019original de l\u2019acte pour le d\u00e9poser en temps utile au greffe de la Cour ;<\/p>\n<p>Qu\u2019il s\u2019ensuit que la demande n\u2019est pas fond\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>Par ces motifs :<\/p>\n<p>rejette la demande et condamne la partie requ\u00e9rante aux frais.<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 par la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg en son audience publique du jeudi, seize juin deux mille seize, \u00e0 la Cit\u00e9 Judiciaire, B\u00e2timent CR, Plateau du St. Esprit, compos\u00e9e de :<\/p>\n<p>Georges SANTER, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation,<\/p>\n<p>3 Nico EDON, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation , Serge THILL, premier conseiller \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel,<\/p>\n<p>qui ont sign\u00e9 le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat avec le greffier Viviane PROBST, \u00e0 l\u2019exception du conseiller Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, qui se trouvait dans l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 de signer.<\/p>\n<p>La lecture du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite en la susdite audience publique par Monsieur le conseiller Romain LUDOVICY, en pr\u00e9sence de Monsieur Georges WIVENES, procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral d\u2019Etat adjoint, et de Madame Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/data.public.lu\/fr\/datasets\/cour-de-cassation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/download.data.public.lu\/resources\/cour-de-cassation\/20240806-144420\/20160616-3747a-accessible.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>N\u00b0 28 \/ 2016 p\u00e9nal. du 16.06.2016. Not. 23398\/09\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3747 du registre. La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l&#8217;organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, seize juin deux\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[8423],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[61603],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,8425],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-836051","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-de-cassation","kji_year-61603","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-penal","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation, 16 juin 2016, n\u00b0 0616-3747 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation, 16 juin 2016, n\u00b0 0616-3747\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"N\u00b0 28 \/ 2016 p\u00e9nal. du 16.06.2016. Not. 23398\/09\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3747 du registre. La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l&#039;organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, seize juin deux\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-04T22:18:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 16 juin 2016, n\u00b0 0616-3747 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-04T22:18:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-04T22:18:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 16 juin 2016, n\u00b0 0616-3747\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/ru\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation, 16 juin 2016, n\u00b0 0616-3747 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation, 16 juin 2016, n\u00b0 0616-3747","og_description":"N\u00b0 28 \/ 2016 p\u00e9nal. du 16.06.2016. Not. 23398\/09\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3747 du registre. La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l'organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, seize juin deux\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-04T22:18:40+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"4 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\/","name":"Cour de cassation, 16 juin 2016, n\u00b0 0616-3747 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-04T22:18:36+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-04T22:18:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-16-juin-2016-n-0616-3747\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/avocats-en-droit-penal-a-paris-conseil-et-defense-strategique\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation, 16 juin 2016, n\u00b0 0616-3747"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/836051","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=836051"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=836051"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=836051"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=836051"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=836051"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=836051"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=836051"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=836051"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}